The Future of Digital Legal History: No Magic, No Silver Bullets

Eric Nystrom, David S. Tanenhaus

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A deceptively simple question - how many juvenile justice laws did the 50 states enact during the 1990s? - was the genesis of our collaboration and this essay. Our attempt to answer this and related questions accurately and efficiently prompted us to consider the significance of digital computing for the field of American legal history. In this essay, we first analyze the challenges and opportunities in applying digital techniques to legal history that include the comparability of sources, completeness of source material, and how to make "data" out of unstructured text. We then sketch some organizing concepts that guided our approach, such as the value of large data sets, computational transparency, and an explicit grounding in the methods and concerns of the historical profession. We describe our particular tools and methods that include full text document search in a custom database, document similarity comparison and clustering at a variety of scales, and weighted term ranking. To conclude we assess what we learned from trying to answer empirical questions about juvenile justice lawmaking during the 1990s, and reflect on the implications of digital computing for legal historians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)150-167
Number of pages18
JournalAmerican Journal of Legal History
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

justice
history
transparency
historian
ranking
profession
Law
Values
Magic
Legal History
1990s
Justice
Organizing
Computational
Ranking
Completeness
Source Material
Genesis
Transparency
Data Base

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • History

Cite this

The Future of Digital Legal History : No Magic, No Silver Bullets. / Nystrom, Eric; Tanenhaus, David S.

In: American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 150-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{6d10027572f54fc194cb51a7542fb918,
title = "The Future of Digital Legal History: No Magic, No Silver Bullets",
abstract = "A deceptively simple question - how many juvenile justice laws did the 50 states enact during the 1990s? - was the genesis of our collaboration and this essay. Our attempt to answer this and related questions accurately and efficiently prompted us to consider the significance of digital computing for the field of American legal history. In this essay, we first analyze the challenges and opportunities in applying digital techniques to legal history that include the comparability of sources, completeness of source material, and how to make {"}data{"} out of unstructured text. We then sketch some organizing concepts that guided our approach, such as the value of large data sets, computational transparency, and an explicit grounding in the methods and concerns of the historical profession. We describe our particular tools and methods that include full text document search in a custom database, document similarity comparison and clustering at a variety of scales, and weighted term ranking. To conclude we assess what we learned from trying to answer empirical questions about juvenile justice lawmaking during the 1990s, and reflect on the implications of digital computing for legal historians.",
author = "Eric Nystrom and Tanenhaus, {David S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ajlh/njv017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "150--167",
journal = "American Journal of Legal History",
issn = "0002-9319",
publisher = "Temple University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Future of Digital Legal History

T2 - No Magic, No Silver Bullets

AU - Nystrom, Eric

AU - Tanenhaus, David S.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - A deceptively simple question - how many juvenile justice laws did the 50 states enact during the 1990s? - was the genesis of our collaboration and this essay. Our attempt to answer this and related questions accurately and efficiently prompted us to consider the significance of digital computing for the field of American legal history. In this essay, we first analyze the challenges and opportunities in applying digital techniques to legal history that include the comparability of sources, completeness of source material, and how to make "data" out of unstructured text. We then sketch some organizing concepts that guided our approach, such as the value of large data sets, computational transparency, and an explicit grounding in the methods and concerns of the historical profession. We describe our particular tools and methods that include full text document search in a custom database, document similarity comparison and clustering at a variety of scales, and weighted term ranking. To conclude we assess what we learned from trying to answer empirical questions about juvenile justice lawmaking during the 1990s, and reflect on the implications of digital computing for legal historians.

AB - A deceptively simple question - how many juvenile justice laws did the 50 states enact during the 1990s? - was the genesis of our collaboration and this essay. Our attempt to answer this and related questions accurately and efficiently prompted us to consider the significance of digital computing for the field of American legal history. In this essay, we first analyze the challenges and opportunities in applying digital techniques to legal history that include the comparability of sources, completeness of source material, and how to make "data" out of unstructured text. We then sketch some organizing concepts that guided our approach, such as the value of large data sets, computational transparency, and an explicit grounding in the methods and concerns of the historical profession. We describe our particular tools and methods that include full text document search in a custom database, document similarity comparison and clustering at a variety of scales, and weighted term ranking. To conclude we assess what we learned from trying to answer empirical questions about juvenile justice lawmaking during the 1990s, and reflect on the implications of digital computing for legal historians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971201890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971201890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ajlh/njv017

DO - 10.1093/ajlh/njv017

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84971201890

VL - 56

SP - 150

EP - 167

JO - American Journal of Legal History

JF - American Journal of Legal History

SN - 0002-9319

IS - 1

ER -