The form and function of reconciliation in primates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sociality is favored by natural selection because it enhances group members' access to valued resources or reduces their vulnerability to predators, but group living also generates conflict among group members. To enjoy the benefits of sociality, group living animals must somehow overcome the costs of conflict. Non-human primates have developed an effective mechanism for resolving conflicts: They participate in peaceful postconflict (PC) reunions with former opponents. These peaceful PC interactions are collectively labeled reconciliation. There is a broad consensus that peaceful contacts among former opponents relieve stressful effects of conflict and permit former opponents to interact peacefully. Primates may reconcile to obtain shortterm objectives, such as access to desirable resources. Alternatively, reconciliation may preserve valuable relationships damaged by conflict. Some researchers view these explanations as complementary, but they generate different predictions about the patterning of reconciliation that can be partially tested with available data. There are good reasons to question the validity of the relationship-repair model, but it remains firmly entrenched in the reconciliation literature, perhaps because it fits our own folk model of how and why we resolve conflicts ourselves. It is possible that the function of reconciliation varies within the primate order, much as other aspects of cognitive abilities do.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-44
Number of pages24
JournalAnnual Review of Anthropology
Volume31
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

reconciliation
sociality
group membership
cognitive ability
resources
Reconciliation
Primates
vulnerability
Group
animal
contact
costs
interaction
Opponents

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Conflict resolution
  • Peacemaking
  • Remediation
  • Sociality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Cite this

The form and function of reconciliation in primates. / Silk, Joan.

In: Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 31, 2002, p. 21-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{968630b55eb846ac9dea5f13e0b6cb66,
title = "The form and function of reconciliation in primates",
abstract = "Sociality is favored by natural selection because it enhances group members' access to valued resources or reduces their vulnerability to predators, but group living also generates conflict among group members. To enjoy the benefits of sociality, group living animals must somehow overcome the costs of conflict. Non-human primates have developed an effective mechanism for resolving conflicts: They participate in peaceful postconflict (PC) reunions with former opponents. These peaceful PC interactions are collectively labeled reconciliation. There is a broad consensus that peaceful contacts among former opponents relieve stressful effects of conflict and permit former opponents to interact peacefully. Primates may reconcile to obtain shortterm objectives, such as access to desirable resources. Alternatively, reconciliation may preserve valuable relationships damaged by conflict. Some researchers view these explanations as complementary, but they generate different predictions about the patterning of reconciliation that can be partially tested with available data. There are good reasons to question the validity of the relationship-repair model, but it remains firmly entrenched in the reconciliation literature, perhaps because it fits our own folk model of how and why we resolve conflicts ourselves. It is possible that the function of reconciliation varies within the primate order, much as other aspects of cognitive abilities do.",
keywords = "Aggression, Conflict resolution, Peacemaking, Remediation, Sociality",
author = "Joan Silk",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.032902.101743",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "21--44",
journal = "Annual Review of Anthropology",
issn = "0084-6570",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The form and function of reconciliation in primates

AU - Silk, Joan

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Sociality is favored by natural selection because it enhances group members' access to valued resources or reduces their vulnerability to predators, but group living also generates conflict among group members. To enjoy the benefits of sociality, group living animals must somehow overcome the costs of conflict. Non-human primates have developed an effective mechanism for resolving conflicts: They participate in peaceful postconflict (PC) reunions with former opponents. These peaceful PC interactions are collectively labeled reconciliation. There is a broad consensus that peaceful contacts among former opponents relieve stressful effects of conflict and permit former opponents to interact peacefully. Primates may reconcile to obtain shortterm objectives, such as access to desirable resources. Alternatively, reconciliation may preserve valuable relationships damaged by conflict. Some researchers view these explanations as complementary, but they generate different predictions about the patterning of reconciliation that can be partially tested with available data. There are good reasons to question the validity of the relationship-repair model, but it remains firmly entrenched in the reconciliation literature, perhaps because it fits our own folk model of how and why we resolve conflicts ourselves. It is possible that the function of reconciliation varies within the primate order, much as other aspects of cognitive abilities do.

AB - Sociality is favored by natural selection because it enhances group members' access to valued resources or reduces their vulnerability to predators, but group living also generates conflict among group members. To enjoy the benefits of sociality, group living animals must somehow overcome the costs of conflict. Non-human primates have developed an effective mechanism for resolving conflicts: They participate in peaceful postconflict (PC) reunions with former opponents. These peaceful PC interactions are collectively labeled reconciliation. There is a broad consensus that peaceful contacts among former opponents relieve stressful effects of conflict and permit former opponents to interact peacefully. Primates may reconcile to obtain shortterm objectives, such as access to desirable resources. Alternatively, reconciliation may preserve valuable relationships damaged by conflict. Some researchers view these explanations as complementary, but they generate different predictions about the patterning of reconciliation that can be partially tested with available data. There are good reasons to question the validity of the relationship-repair model, but it remains firmly entrenched in the reconciliation literature, perhaps because it fits our own folk model of how and why we resolve conflicts ourselves. It is possible that the function of reconciliation varies within the primate order, much as other aspects of cognitive abilities do.

KW - Aggression

KW - Conflict resolution

KW - Peacemaking

KW - Remediation

KW - Sociality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2742523242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2742523242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.032902.101743

DO - 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.032902.101743

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 21

EP - 44

JO - Annual Review of Anthropology

JF - Annual Review of Anthropology

SN - 0084-6570

ER -