The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes

Joanna Harper, Giscard Lima, Alexander Kolliari-Turner, Fernanda Rossell Malinsky, Guan Wang, Maria Jose Martinez-Patino, Siddhartha Angadi, Theodora Papadopoulou, Fabio Pigozzi, Leighton Seal, James Barrett, Yannis P. Pitsiladis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the most contentious issues in modern day sport arises when sports are divided into male and female categories. The International Association of Athletics Federations' (IAAF) previous policy regulating intersex athletes was suspended by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), resulting in a new policy. The challenge faced by the governing body of athletics is to formulate a policy that upholds both international law and the Olympic charter that stipulates athletes compete without discrimination of any kind. Implementation of the policy has been delayed until after a verdict, expected no later than March 26, 2019, in the Semenya versus IAAF trial in theCourt ofArbitration for Sport. If the policy is enacted, it will restrict athletes from competing in the female athletics category with specific differences of sex development (DSD) in races from 400mup to themile in international level competitions unless they lower their natural testosterone (T) levels below 5 nmolIL-1. To thoroughly assess this new IAAF policy, one needs to appreciate its legal, sociological, and scientific underpinnings but also the history of previous policies attempting to define precisely how athletes should be divided into male and female categories. We previously proposed a systemto deal with gender variant athletes that relied on a determination of an ''athlete/athletic gender.'' The concept of ''athlete gender''was presented tomultiple audiences, and the resulting survey is included. A large majority of participants (71% of 153) who answered the survey agreed with the idea of an athlete gender. This position also was accompanied by the request for more studies (20% of those who agreed) and concern over the process of hormonemonitoring (32%of thosewho agreed) to avoid dopingmisuse. The primary argument of those participating in the survey that disagreed with the position (23% of 153) was that biological differences between males and females remained even after the transition (47% of opposing comments). Mixed gender/sex competitions provide unique opportunities for athletes to compete against one another outside of the traditionalmale/ female divide and pave the way for a more flexible approach for dealing with gender variant athletes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)467-472
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Sports Medicine Reports
Volume17
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Transgender Persons
Athletes
Sports
Sexual Development
Negotiating
Testosterone
History

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Harper, J., Lima, G., Kolliari-Turner, A., Malinsky, F. R., Wang, G., Martinez-Patino, M. J., ... Pitsiladis, Y. P. (2018). The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 17(12), 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000000543

The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes. / Harper, Joanna; Lima, Giscard; Kolliari-Turner, Alexander; Malinsky, Fernanda Rossell; Wang, Guan; Martinez-Patino, Maria Jose; Angadi, Siddhartha; Papadopoulou, Theodora; Pigozzi, Fabio; Seal, Leighton; Barrett, James; Pitsiladis, Yannis P.

In: Current Sports Medicine Reports, Vol. 17, No. 12, 01.12.2018, p. 467-472.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harper, J, Lima, G, Kolliari-Turner, A, Malinsky, FR, Wang, G, Martinez-Patino, MJ, Angadi, S, Papadopoulou, T, Pigozzi, F, Seal, L, Barrett, J & Pitsiladis, YP 2018, 'The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes', Current Sports Medicine Reports, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000000543
Harper, Joanna ; Lima, Giscard ; Kolliari-Turner, Alexander ; Malinsky, Fernanda Rossell ; Wang, Guan ; Martinez-Patino, Maria Jose ; Angadi, Siddhartha ; Papadopoulou, Theodora ; Pigozzi, Fabio ; Seal, Leighton ; Barrett, James ; Pitsiladis, Yannis P. / The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes. In: Current Sports Medicine Reports. 2018 ; Vol. 17, No. 12. pp. 467-472.
@article{8d71324e603b481cb08d8b27d3382beb,
title = "The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes",
abstract = "One of the most contentious issues in modern day sport arises when sports are divided into male and female categories. The International Association of Athletics Federations' (IAAF) previous policy regulating intersex athletes was suspended by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), resulting in a new policy. The challenge faced by the governing body of athletics is to formulate a policy that upholds both international law and the Olympic charter that stipulates athletes compete without discrimination of any kind. Implementation of the policy has been delayed until after a verdict, expected no later than March 26, 2019, in the Semenya versus IAAF trial in theCourt ofArbitration for Sport. If the policy is enacted, it will restrict athletes from competing in the female athletics category with specific differences of sex development (DSD) in races from 400mup to themile in international level competitions unless they lower their natural testosterone (T) levels below 5 nmolIL-1. To thoroughly assess this new IAAF policy, one needs to appreciate its legal, sociological, and scientific underpinnings but also the history of previous policies attempting to define precisely how athletes should be divided into male and female categories. We previously proposed a systemto deal with gender variant athletes that relied on a determination of an ''athlete/athletic gender.'' The concept of ''athlete gender''was presented tomultiple audiences, and the resulting survey is included. A large majority of participants (71{\%} of 153) who answered the survey agreed with the idea of an athlete gender. This position also was accompanied by the request for more studies (20{\%} of those who agreed) and concern over the process of hormonemonitoring (32{\%}of thosewho agreed) to avoid dopingmisuse. The primary argument of those participating in the survey that disagreed with the position (23{\%} of 153) was that biological differences between males and females remained even after the transition (47{\%} of opposing comments). Mixed gender/sex competitions provide unique opportunities for athletes to compete against one another outside of the traditionalmale/ female divide and pave the way for a more flexible approach for dealing with gender variant athletes.",
author = "Joanna Harper and Giscard Lima and Alexander Kolliari-Turner and Malinsky, {Fernanda Rossell} and Guan Wang and Martinez-Patino, {Maria Jose} and Siddhartha Angadi and Theodora Papadopoulou and Fabio Pigozzi and Leighton Seal and James Barrett and Pitsiladis, {Yannis P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1249/JSR.0000000000000543",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "467--472",
journal = "Current Sports Medicine Reports",
issn = "1537-890X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes

AU - Harper, Joanna

AU - Lima, Giscard

AU - Kolliari-Turner, Alexander

AU - Malinsky, Fernanda Rossell

AU - Wang, Guan

AU - Martinez-Patino, Maria Jose

AU - Angadi, Siddhartha

AU - Papadopoulou, Theodora

AU - Pigozzi, Fabio

AU - Seal, Leighton

AU - Barrett, James

AU - Pitsiladis, Yannis P.

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - One of the most contentious issues in modern day sport arises when sports are divided into male and female categories. The International Association of Athletics Federations' (IAAF) previous policy regulating intersex athletes was suspended by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), resulting in a new policy. The challenge faced by the governing body of athletics is to formulate a policy that upholds both international law and the Olympic charter that stipulates athletes compete without discrimination of any kind. Implementation of the policy has been delayed until after a verdict, expected no later than March 26, 2019, in the Semenya versus IAAF trial in theCourt ofArbitration for Sport. If the policy is enacted, it will restrict athletes from competing in the female athletics category with specific differences of sex development (DSD) in races from 400mup to themile in international level competitions unless they lower their natural testosterone (T) levels below 5 nmolIL-1. To thoroughly assess this new IAAF policy, one needs to appreciate its legal, sociological, and scientific underpinnings but also the history of previous policies attempting to define precisely how athletes should be divided into male and female categories. We previously proposed a systemto deal with gender variant athletes that relied on a determination of an ''athlete/athletic gender.'' The concept of ''athlete gender''was presented tomultiple audiences, and the resulting survey is included. A large majority of participants (71% of 153) who answered the survey agreed with the idea of an athlete gender. This position also was accompanied by the request for more studies (20% of those who agreed) and concern over the process of hormonemonitoring (32%of thosewho agreed) to avoid dopingmisuse. The primary argument of those participating in the survey that disagreed with the position (23% of 153) was that biological differences between males and females remained even after the transition (47% of opposing comments). Mixed gender/sex competitions provide unique opportunities for athletes to compete against one another outside of the traditionalmale/ female divide and pave the way for a more flexible approach for dealing with gender variant athletes.

AB - One of the most contentious issues in modern day sport arises when sports are divided into male and female categories. The International Association of Athletics Federations' (IAAF) previous policy regulating intersex athletes was suspended by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), resulting in a new policy. The challenge faced by the governing body of athletics is to formulate a policy that upholds both international law and the Olympic charter that stipulates athletes compete without discrimination of any kind. Implementation of the policy has been delayed until after a verdict, expected no later than March 26, 2019, in the Semenya versus IAAF trial in theCourt ofArbitration for Sport. If the policy is enacted, it will restrict athletes from competing in the female athletics category with specific differences of sex development (DSD) in races from 400mup to themile in international level competitions unless they lower their natural testosterone (T) levels below 5 nmolIL-1. To thoroughly assess this new IAAF policy, one needs to appreciate its legal, sociological, and scientific underpinnings but also the history of previous policies attempting to define precisely how athletes should be divided into male and female categories. We previously proposed a systemto deal with gender variant athletes that relied on a determination of an ''athlete/athletic gender.'' The concept of ''athlete gender''was presented tomultiple audiences, and the resulting survey is included. A large majority of participants (71% of 153) who answered the survey agreed with the idea of an athlete gender. This position also was accompanied by the request for more studies (20% of those who agreed) and concern over the process of hormonemonitoring (32%of thosewho agreed) to avoid dopingmisuse. The primary argument of those participating in the survey that disagreed with the position (23% of 153) was that biological differences between males and females remained even after the transition (47% of opposing comments). Mixed gender/sex competitions provide unique opportunities for athletes to compete against one another outside of the traditionalmale/ female divide and pave the way for a more flexible approach for dealing with gender variant athletes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058386534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058386534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000543

DO - 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000543

M3 - Article

C2 - 30531465

AN - SCOPUS:85058386534

VL - 17

SP - 467

EP - 472

JO - Current Sports Medicine Reports

JF - Current Sports Medicine Reports

SN - 1537-890X

IS - 12

ER -