The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes

Joanna Harper, Giscard Lima, Alexander Kolliari-Turner, Fernanda Rossell Malinsky, Guan Wang, Maria Jose Martinez-Patino, Siddhartha Angadi, Theodora Papadopoulou, Fabio Pigozzi, Leighton Seal, James Barrett, Yannis P. Pitsiladis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    One of the most contentious issues in modern day sport arises when sports are divided into male and female categories. The International Association of Athletics Federations' (IAAF) previous policy regulating intersex athletes was suspended by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), resulting in a new policy. The challenge faced by the governing body of athletics is to formulate a policy that upholds both international law and the Olympic charter that stipulates athletes compete without discrimination of any kind. Implementation of the policy has been delayed until after a verdict, expected no later than March 26, 2019, in the Semenya versus IAAF trial in theCourt ofArbitration for Sport. If the policy is enacted, it will restrict athletes from competing in the female athletics category with specific differences of sex development (DSD) in races from 400mup to themile in international level competitions unless they lower their natural testosterone (T) levels below 5 nmolIL-1. To thoroughly assess this new IAAF policy, one needs to appreciate its legal, sociological, and scientific underpinnings but also the history of previous policies attempting to define precisely how athletes should be divided into male and female categories. We previously proposed a systemto deal with gender variant athletes that relied on a determination of an ''athlete/athletic gender.'' The concept of ''athlete gender''was presented tomultiple audiences, and the resulting survey is included. A large majority of participants (71% of 153) who answered the survey agreed with the idea of an athlete gender. This position also was accompanied by the request for more studies (20% of those who agreed) and concern over the process of hormonemonitoring (32%of thosewho agreed) to avoid dopingmisuse. The primary argument of those participating in the survey that disagreed with the position (23% of 153) was that biological differences between males and females remained even after the transition (47% of opposing comments). Mixed gender/sex competitions provide unique opportunities for athletes to compete against one another outside of the traditionalmale/ female divide and pave the way for a more flexible approach for dealing with gender variant athletes.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)467-472
    Number of pages6
    JournalCurrent Sports Medicine Reports
    Volume17
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    Transgender Persons
    Athletes
    Sports
    Sexual Development
    Negotiating
    Testosterone
    History

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Cite this

    Harper, J., Lima, G., Kolliari-Turner, A., Malinsky, F. R., Wang, G., Martinez-Patino, M. J., ... Pitsiladis, Y. P. (2018). The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 17(12), 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000000543

    The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes. / Harper, Joanna; Lima, Giscard; Kolliari-Turner, Alexander; Malinsky, Fernanda Rossell; Wang, Guan; Martinez-Patino, Maria Jose; Angadi, Siddhartha; Papadopoulou, Theodora; Pigozzi, Fabio; Seal, Leighton; Barrett, James; Pitsiladis, Yannis P.

    In: Current Sports Medicine Reports, Vol. 17, No. 12, 01.12.2018, p. 467-472.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Harper, J, Lima, G, Kolliari-Turner, A, Malinsky, FR, Wang, G, Martinez-Patino, MJ, Angadi, S, Papadopoulou, T, Pigozzi, F, Seal, L, Barrett, J & Pitsiladis, YP 2018, 'The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes' Current Sports Medicine Reports, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000000543
    Harper, Joanna ; Lima, Giscard ; Kolliari-Turner, Alexander ; Malinsky, Fernanda Rossell ; Wang, Guan ; Martinez-Patino, Maria Jose ; Angadi, Siddhartha ; Papadopoulou, Theodora ; Pigozzi, Fabio ; Seal, Leighton ; Barrett, James ; Pitsiladis, Yannis P. / The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes. In: Current Sports Medicine Reports. 2018 ; Vol. 17, No. 12. pp. 467-472.
    @article{8d71324e603b481cb08d8b27d3382beb,
    title = "The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes",
    abstract = "One of the most contentious issues in modern day sport arises when sports are divided into male and female categories. The International Association of Athletics Federations' (IAAF) previous policy regulating intersex athletes was suspended by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), resulting in a new policy. The challenge faced by the governing body of athletics is to formulate a policy that upholds both international law and the Olympic charter that stipulates athletes compete without discrimination of any kind. Implementation of the policy has been delayed until after a verdict, expected no later than March 26, 2019, in the Semenya versus IAAF trial in theCourt ofArbitration for Sport. If the policy is enacted, it will restrict athletes from competing in the female athletics category with specific differences of sex development (DSD) in races from 400mup to themile in international level competitions unless they lower their natural testosterone (T) levels below 5 nmolIL-1. To thoroughly assess this new IAAF policy, one needs to appreciate its legal, sociological, and scientific underpinnings but also the history of previous policies attempting to define precisely how athletes should be divided into male and female categories. We previously proposed a systemto deal with gender variant athletes that relied on a determination of an ''athlete/athletic gender.'' The concept of ''athlete gender''was presented tomultiple audiences, and the resulting survey is included. A large majority of participants (71{\%} of 153) who answered the survey agreed with the idea of an athlete gender. This position also was accompanied by the request for more studies (20{\%} of those who agreed) and concern over the process of hormonemonitoring (32{\%}of thosewho agreed) to avoid dopingmisuse. The primary argument of those participating in the survey that disagreed with the position (23{\%} of 153) was that biological differences between males and females remained even after the transition (47{\%} of opposing comments). Mixed gender/sex competitions provide unique opportunities for athletes to compete against one another outside of the traditionalmale/ female divide and pave the way for a more flexible approach for dealing with gender variant athletes.",
    author = "Joanna Harper and Giscard Lima and Alexander Kolliari-Turner and Malinsky, {Fernanda Rossell} and Guan Wang and Martinez-Patino, {Maria Jose} and Siddhartha Angadi and Theodora Papadopoulou and Fabio Pigozzi and Leighton Seal and James Barrett and Pitsiladis, {Yannis P.}",
    year = "2018",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1249/JSR.0000000000000543",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "467--472",
    journal = "Current Sports Medicine Reports",
    issn = "1537-890X",
    publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
    number = "12",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Fluidity of Gender and Implications for the Biology of Inclusion for Transgender and Intersex Athletes

    AU - Harper, Joanna

    AU - Lima, Giscard

    AU - Kolliari-Turner, Alexander

    AU - Malinsky, Fernanda Rossell

    AU - Wang, Guan

    AU - Martinez-Patino, Maria Jose

    AU - Angadi, Siddhartha

    AU - Papadopoulou, Theodora

    AU - Pigozzi, Fabio

    AU - Seal, Leighton

    AU - Barrett, James

    AU - Pitsiladis, Yannis P.

    PY - 2018/12/1

    Y1 - 2018/12/1

    N2 - One of the most contentious issues in modern day sport arises when sports are divided into male and female categories. The International Association of Athletics Federations' (IAAF) previous policy regulating intersex athletes was suspended by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), resulting in a new policy. The challenge faced by the governing body of athletics is to formulate a policy that upholds both international law and the Olympic charter that stipulates athletes compete without discrimination of any kind. Implementation of the policy has been delayed until after a verdict, expected no later than March 26, 2019, in the Semenya versus IAAF trial in theCourt ofArbitration for Sport. If the policy is enacted, it will restrict athletes from competing in the female athletics category with specific differences of sex development (DSD) in races from 400mup to themile in international level competitions unless they lower their natural testosterone (T) levels below 5 nmolIL-1. To thoroughly assess this new IAAF policy, one needs to appreciate its legal, sociological, and scientific underpinnings but also the history of previous policies attempting to define precisely how athletes should be divided into male and female categories. We previously proposed a systemto deal with gender variant athletes that relied on a determination of an ''athlete/athletic gender.'' The concept of ''athlete gender''was presented tomultiple audiences, and the resulting survey is included. A large majority of participants (71% of 153) who answered the survey agreed with the idea of an athlete gender. This position also was accompanied by the request for more studies (20% of those who agreed) and concern over the process of hormonemonitoring (32%of thosewho agreed) to avoid dopingmisuse. The primary argument of those participating in the survey that disagreed with the position (23% of 153) was that biological differences between males and females remained even after the transition (47% of opposing comments). Mixed gender/sex competitions provide unique opportunities for athletes to compete against one another outside of the traditionalmale/ female divide and pave the way for a more flexible approach for dealing with gender variant athletes.

    AB - One of the most contentious issues in modern day sport arises when sports are divided into male and female categories. The International Association of Athletics Federations' (IAAF) previous policy regulating intersex athletes was suspended by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), resulting in a new policy. The challenge faced by the governing body of athletics is to formulate a policy that upholds both international law and the Olympic charter that stipulates athletes compete without discrimination of any kind. Implementation of the policy has been delayed until after a verdict, expected no later than March 26, 2019, in the Semenya versus IAAF trial in theCourt ofArbitration for Sport. If the policy is enacted, it will restrict athletes from competing in the female athletics category with specific differences of sex development (DSD) in races from 400mup to themile in international level competitions unless they lower their natural testosterone (T) levels below 5 nmolIL-1. To thoroughly assess this new IAAF policy, one needs to appreciate its legal, sociological, and scientific underpinnings but also the history of previous policies attempting to define precisely how athletes should be divided into male and female categories. We previously proposed a systemto deal with gender variant athletes that relied on a determination of an ''athlete/athletic gender.'' The concept of ''athlete gender''was presented tomultiple audiences, and the resulting survey is included. A large majority of participants (71% of 153) who answered the survey agreed with the idea of an athlete gender. This position also was accompanied by the request for more studies (20% of those who agreed) and concern over the process of hormonemonitoring (32%of thosewho agreed) to avoid dopingmisuse. The primary argument of those participating in the survey that disagreed with the position (23% of 153) was that biological differences between males and females remained even after the transition (47% of opposing comments). Mixed gender/sex competitions provide unique opportunities for athletes to compete against one another outside of the traditionalmale/ female divide and pave the way for a more flexible approach for dealing with gender variant athletes.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058386534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058386534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000543

    DO - 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000543

    M3 - Article

    VL - 17

    SP - 467

    EP - 472

    JO - Current Sports Medicine Reports

    JF - Current Sports Medicine Reports

    SN - 1537-890X

    IS - 12

    ER -