The flip side of vanity sizing: How consumers respond to and compensate for larger than expected clothing sizes

JoAndrea Hoegg, Maura L. Scott, Andrea Ketcham, Darren W. Dahl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vanity sizing has become a popular retail trend and recent work shows it has a favorable impact on consumers. However, as the current research demonstrates, significant variations in sizing standards across retailers mean that consumers are as likely to encounter larger sizes as they are smaller, "vanity" sizes when shopping, highlighting the importance of understanding how consumers react to this potential threat in the marketplace. Across five studies we demonstrate that larger sizes result in negative evaluations of clothing and show that these effects are driven by consumers' appearance self-esteem. Importantly, we also find that instead of unilaterally lowering purchase intent as one might assume, larger sizes can actually increase spending, as consumers engage in compensatory consumption to help repair their damaged self-esteem. In so doing, this research reveals a dynamic and complex relationship between consumers and sizing labels, where shopping can serve to build, strengthen, threaten, and/or repair appearance self-esteem.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)70-78
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Consumer Psychology
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Clothing
Self Concept
Research
Sizing
Self-esteem

Keywords

  • Appearance
  • Compensatory consumption
  • Self-esteem
  • Vanity sizing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Marketing

Cite this

The flip side of vanity sizing : How consumers respond to and compensate for larger than expected clothing sizes. / Hoegg, JoAndrea; Scott, Maura L.; Ketcham, Andrea; Dahl, Darren W.

In: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 70-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5ddc3e0074b24db081e7447addf39cca,
title = "The flip side of vanity sizing: How consumers respond to and compensate for larger than expected clothing sizes",
abstract = "Vanity sizing has become a popular retail trend and recent work shows it has a favorable impact on consumers. However, as the current research demonstrates, significant variations in sizing standards across retailers mean that consumers are as likely to encounter larger sizes as they are smaller, {"}vanity{"} sizes when shopping, highlighting the importance of understanding how consumers react to this potential threat in the marketplace. Across five studies we demonstrate that larger sizes result in negative evaluations of clothing and show that these effects are driven by consumers' appearance self-esteem. Importantly, we also find that instead of unilaterally lowering purchase intent as one might assume, larger sizes can actually increase spending, as consumers engage in compensatory consumption to help repair their damaged self-esteem. In so doing, this research reveals a dynamic and complex relationship between consumers and sizing labels, where shopping can serve to build, strengthen, threaten, and/or repair appearance self-esteem.",
keywords = "Appearance, Compensatory consumption, Self-esteem, Vanity sizing",
author = "JoAndrea Hoegg and Scott, {Maura L.} and Andrea Ketcham and Dahl, {Darren W.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "70--78",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Psychology",
issn = "1057-7408",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The flip side of vanity sizing

T2 - How consumers respond to and compensate for larger than expected clothing sizes

AU - Hoegg, JoAndrea

AU - Scott, Maura L.

AU - Ketcham, Andrea

AU - Dahl, Darren W.

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Vanity sizing has become a popular retail trend and recent work shows it has a favorable impact on consumers. However, as the current research demonstrates, significant variations in sizing standards across retailers mean that consumers are as likely to encounter larger sizes as they are smaller, "vanity" sizes when shopping, highlighting the importance of understanding how consumers react to this potential threat in the marketplace. Across five studies we demonstrate that larger sizes result in negative evaluations of clothing and show that these effects are driven by consumers' appearance self-esteem. Importantly, we also find that instead of unilaterally lowering purchase intent as one might assume, larger sizes can actually increase spending, as consumers engage in compensatory consumption to help repair their damaged self-esteem. In so doing, this research reveals a dynamic and complex relationship between consumers and sizing labels, where shopping can serve to build, strengthen, threaten, and/or repair appearance self-esteem.

AB - Vanity sizing has become a popular retail trend and recent work shows it has a favorable impact on consumers. However, as the current research demonstrates, significant variations in sizing standards across retailers mean that consumers are as likely to encounter larger sizes as they are smaller, "vanity" sizes when shopping, highlighting the importance of understanding how consumers react to this potential threat in the marketplace. Across five studies we demonstrate that larger sizes result in negative evaluations of clothing and show that these effects are driven by consumers' appearance self-esteem. Importantly, we also find that instead of unilaterally lowering purchase intent as one might assume, larger sizes can actually increase spending, as consumers engage in compensatory consumption to help repair their damaged self-esteem. In so doing, this research reveals a dynamic and complex relationship between consumers and sizing labels, where shopping can serve to build, strengthen, threaten, and/or repair appearance self-esteem.

KW - Appearance

KW - Compensatory consumption

KW - Self-esteem

KW - Vanity sizing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892374305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892374305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84892374305

VL - 24

SP - 70

EP - 78

JO - Journal of Consumer Psychology

JF - Journal of Consumer Psychology

SN - 1057-7408

IS - 1

ER -