TY - JOUR
T1 - The Fantasy of Exit
T2 - Campaign Use and Abuse of Exit in the UK’s 2016 Brexit Debate
AU - Kirkpatrick, Jennet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Caucus for a New Political Science.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Many political theorists have associated exit with positive attributes, seeing it as crucial individual sovereignty and self-determination. However, the 2016 Brexit debate about whether the U.K. should leave the E.U. revealed ambiguous and worrying uses of exit, especially concerning the spike in hate crimes after the referendum. We need to understand better how the concept of exit is changing in political discourse. Through studying the Brexit debate, I found conceptual connections between a national, sovereign exit and nativistic violence, which suggests that exit can be a dangerous concept. I argue we should move past a one-sided, optimistic view of exit and be attentive to exit’s destructive potential in the future.
AB - Many political theorists have associated exit with positive attributes, seeing it as crucial individual sovereignty and self-determination. However, the 2016 Brexit debate about whether the U.K. should leave the E.U. revealed ambiguous and worrying uses of exit, especially concerning the spike in hate crimes after the referendum. We need to understand better how the concept of exit is changing in political discourse. Through studying the Brexit debate, I found conceptual connections between a national, sovereign exit and nativistic violence, which suggests that exit can be a dangerous concept. I argue we should move past a one-sided, optimistic view of exit and be attentive to exit’s destructive potential in the future.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130868432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85130868432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07393148.2022.2062197
DO - 10.1080/07393148.2022.2062197
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85130868432
SN - 0739-3148
JO - New Political Science
JF - New Political Science
ER -