The expectation gap: Perceptual differences between auditors, jurors and students

Kimberly E. Frank, David Lowe, James K. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The expectation gap has been presumed to be caused by the differing perceptions of the accounting profession and third parties regarding the profession's role, responsibilities, and related performance. Prior research regarding the expectation gap has focused on diverging perceptions of different groups (i.e. financial analysts, bank loan officers, small business owners, and auditors). While this research has identified an expectation gap between auditors and certain third parties, it has neglected examining the perceptions of judicial third parties. This absence is somewhat ironic given the role that jurors and judges play in determining auditors’ legal liability. This void is filled by comparing jurors’, auditors’, and accounting students’ attitudes towards the accounting profession. Results reveal a large divergence in perceptions of auditors and jurors regarding their expectations of the accounting profession. However, accounting students responded in a manner very similar to practicing auditors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-150
Number of pages6
JournalManagerial Auditing Journal
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Auditors
Expectations gap
Accounting profession
Accounting students
Owners
Financial analysts
Bank loans
Legal liability
Student attitudes
Divergence
Small business
Responsibility

Keywords

  • Accountancy
  • Attitudes
  • Auditors
  • Financial statements
  • Legal matters

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

The expectation gap : Perceptual differences between auditors, jurors and students. / Frank, Kimberly E.; Lowe, David; Smith, James K.

In: Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.04.2001, p. 145-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frank, Kimberly E. ; Lowe, David ; Smith, James K. / The expectation gap : Perceptual differences between auditors, jurors and students. In: Managerial Auditing Journal. 2001 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 145-150.
@article{ecd954aaea5742a0ad095b1096b1c6c2,
title = "The expectation gap: Perceptual differences between auditors, jurors and students",
abstract = "The expectation gap has been presumed to be caused by the differing perceptions of the accounting profession and third parties regarding the profession's role, responsibilities, and related performance. Prior research regarding the expectation gap has focused on diverging perceptions of different groups (i.e. financial analysts, bank loan officers, small business owners, and auditors). While this research has identified an expectation gap between auditors and certain third parties, it has neglected examining the perceptions of judicial third parties. This absence is somewhat ironic given the role that jurors and judges play in determining auditors’ legal liability. This void is filled by comparing jurors’, auditors’, and accounting students’ attitudes towards the accounting profession. Results reveal a large divergence in perceptions of auditors and jurors regarding their expectations of the accounting profession. However, accounting students responded in a manner very similar to practicing auditors.",
keywords = "Accountancy, Attitudes, Auditors, Financial statements, Legal matters",
author = "Frank, {Kimberly E.} and David Lowe and Smith, {James K.}",
year = "2001",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/02686900110385588",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "145--150",
journal = "Managerial Auditing Journal",
issn = "0268-6902",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The expectation gap

T2 - Perceptual differences between auditors, jurors and students

AU - Frank, Kimberly E.

AU - Lowe, David

AU - Smith, James K.

PY - 2001/4/1

Y1 - 2001/4/1

N2 - The expectation gap has been presumed to be caused by the differing perceptions of the accounting profession and third parties regarding the profession's role, responsibilities, and related performance. Prior research regarding the expectation gap has focused on diverging perceptions of different groups (i.e. financial analysts, bank loan officers, small business owners, and auditors). While this research has identified an expectation gap between auditors and certain third parties, it has neglected examining the perceptions of judicial third parties. This absence is somewhat ironic given the role that jurors and judges play in determining auditors’ legal liability. This void is filled by comparing jurors’, auditors’, and accounting students’ attitudes towards the accounting profession. Results reveal a large divergence in perceptions of auditors and jurors regarding their expectations of the accounting profession. However, accounting students responded in a manner very similar to practicing auditors.

AB - The expectation gap has been presumed to be caused by the differing perceptions of the accounting profession and third parties regarding the profession's role, responsibilities, and related performance. Prior research regarding the expectation gap has focused on diverging perceptions of different groups (i.e. financial analysts, bank loan officers, small business owners, and auditors). While this research has identified an expectation gap between auditors and certain third parties, it has neglected examining the perceptions of judicial third parties. This absence is somewhat ironic given the role that jurors and judges play in determining auditors’ legal liability. This void is filled by comparing jurors’, auditors’, and accounting students’ attitudes towards the accounting profession. Results reveal a large divergence in perceptions of auditors and jurors regarding their expectations of the accounting profession. However, accounting students responded in a manner very similar to practicing auditors.

KW - Accountancy

KW - Attitudes

KW - Auditors

KW - Financial statements

KW - Legal matters

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986104090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986104090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/02686900110385588

DO - 10.1108/02686900110385588

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84986104090

VL - 16

SP - 145

EP - 150

JO - Managerial Auditing Journal

JF - Managerial Auditing Journal

SN - 0268-6902

IS - 3

ER -