The evolutionary functions of repression and the ego defenses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent advances in basic evolutionary biology have transformed ethology, but have had little impact on psychoanalysis. As evolutionary approaches to human behavior begin to focus on the specific behavior regulation mechanisms that have been shaped by natural selection, psychodynamic mechanisms become natural objects of inquiry. The capacity for repression is at the core of psychodynamics, and must be explained first. It is a first-class evolutionary mystery because it distorts reality, it contributes to maladaptation, and because existing explanations have been outmoded by advances in evolutionary theory. The evolutionary biologists Trivers and Alexander have each proposed that repression conceals motives from the self, and thus better conceals them from others so that selfish motives can be covertly pursued. This startling idea becomes plausible when viewed in the light of modern studies of animal relationships and communication. Several other functions of repression also enhance fitness by deceiving the self to better deceive others, but repression may function more generally by distorting reality whenever accurate perception would be maladaptive. Although repression sometimes assists short-term strategies of manipulation (cheating), it more often assists long-term strategies that depend on maintenance of secure relationships. This position is largely consistent with existing psychoanalytic theory. The specific ego defenses can be understood as specialized capacities for deceiving others. The ubiquity of intrapsychic conflict between id wishes and superego/ego inhibitions may have been shaped by the constant choices that must be made between selfish strategies that offer a short-term benefit with a long-term social cost, versus altruistic strategies that exact a short-term cost but offer the possibility of a long-term reciprocity benefit. Other psychodynamic characteristics of the mind, oedipal wishes, castration anxiety, transference, and so forth, also require evolutionary explanations. In the process of the search for them, psychoanalysis may find the foundation in basic biology that it has long sought, and evolutionary biology may find that some of the evolved mechanisms that regulate human behavior have already been carefully studied by psychoanalysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)260-285
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis
Volume18
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ego
Psychoanalysis
Castration Anxiety
Animal Communication
Ethology
Superego
Psychoanalytic Theory
Costs and Cost Analysis
Genetic Selection
Maintenance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The evolutionary functions of repression and the ego defenses. / Nesse, Randolph.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1990, p. 260-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6304fdfe75584e1eab503c3c1dd76c8a,
title = "The evolutionary functions of repression and the ego defenses",
abstract = "Recent advances in basic evolutionary biology have transformed ethology, but have had little impact on psychoanalysis. As evolutionary approaches to human behavior begin to focus on the specific behavior regulation mechanisms that have been shaped by natural selection, psychodynamic mechanisms become natural objects of inquiry. The capacity for repression is at the core of psychodynamics, and must be explained first. It is a first-class evolutionary mystery because it distorts reality, it contributes to maladaptation, and because existing explanations have been outmoded by advances in evolutionary theory. The evolutionary biologists Trivers and Alexander have each proposed that repression conceals motives from the self, and thus better conceals them from others so that selfish motives can be covertly pursued. This startling idea becomes plausible when viewed in the light of modern studies of animal relationships and communication. Several other functions of repression also enhance fitness by deceiving the self to better deceive others, but repression may function more generally by distorting reality whenever accurate perception would be maladaptive. Although repression sometimes assists short-term strategies of manipulation (cheating), it more often assists long-term strategies that depend on maintenance of secure relationships. This position is largely consistent with existing psychoanalytic theory. The specific ego defenses can be understood as specialized capacities for deceiving others. The ubiquity of intrapsychic conflict between id wishes and superego/ego inhibitions may have been shaped by the constant choices that must be made between selfish strategies that offer a short-term benefit with a long-term social cost, versus altruistic strategies that exact a short-term cost but offer the possibility of a long-term reciprocity benefit. Other psychodynamic characteristics of the mind, oedipal wishes, castration anxiety, transference, and so forth, also require evolutionary explanations. In the process of the search for them, psychoanalysis may find the foundation in basic biology that it has long sought, and evolutionary biology may find that some of the evolved mechanisms that regulate human behavior have already been carefully studied by psychoanalysis.",
author = "Randolph Nesse",
year = "1990",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "260--285",
journal = "Psychodynamic Psychiatry",
issn = "2162-2590",
publisher = "Guilford Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evolutionary functions of repression and the ego defenses

AU - Nesse, Randolph

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - Recent advances in basic evolutionary biology have transformed ethology, but have had little impact on psychoanalysis. As evolutionary approaches to human behavior begin to focus on the specific behavior regulation mechanisms that have been shaped by natural selection, psychodynamic mechanisms become natural objects of inquiry. The capacity for repression is at the core of psychodynamics, and must be explained first. It is a first-class evolutionary mystery because it distorts reality, it contributes to maladaptation, and because existing explanations have been outmoded by advances in evolutionary theory. The evolutionary biologists Trivers and Alexander have each proposed that repression conceals motives from the self, and thus better conceals them from others so that selfish motives can be covertly pursued. This startling idea becomes plausible when viewed in the light of modern studies of animal relationships and communication. Several other functions of repression also enhance fitness by deceiving the self to better deceive others, but repression may function more generally by distorting reality whenever accurate perception would be maladaptive. Although repression sometimes assists short-term strategies of manipulation (cheating), it more often assists long-term strategies that depend on maintenance of secure relationships. This position is largely consistent with existing psychoanalytic theory. The specific ego defenses can be understood as specialized capacities for deceiving others. The ubiquity of intrapsychic conflict between id wishes and superego/ego inhibitions may have been shaped by the constant choices that must be made between selfish strategies that offer a short-term benefit with a long-term social cost, versus altruistic strategies that exact a short-term cost but offer the possibility of a long-term reciprocity benefit. Other psychodynamic characteristics of the mind, oedipal wishes, castration anxiety, transference, and so forth, also require evolutionary explanations. In the process of the search for them, psychoanalysis may find the foundation in basic biology that it has long sought, and evolutionary biology may find that some of the evolved mechanisms that regulate human behavior have already been carefully studied by psychoanalysis.

AB - Recent advances in basic evolutionary biology have transformed ethology, but have had little impact on psychoanalysis. As evolutionary approaches to human behavior begin to focus on the specific behavior regulation mechanisms that have been shaped by natural selection, psychodynamic mechanisms become natural objects of inquiry. The capacity for repression is at the core of psychodynamics, and must be explained first. It is a first-class evolutionary mystery because it distorts reality, it contributes to maladaptation, and because existing explanations have been outmoded by advances in evolutionary theory. The evolutionary biologists Trivers and Alexander have each proposed that repression conceals motives from the self, and thus better conceals them from others so that selfish motives can be covertly pursued. This startling idea becomes plausible when viewed in the light of modern studies of animal relationships and communication. Several other functions of repression also enhance fitness by deceiving the self to better deceive others, but repression may function more generally by distorting reality whenever accurate perception would be maladaptive. Although repression sometimes assists short-term strategies of manipulation (cheating), it more often assists long-term strategies that depend on maintenance of secure relationships. This position is largely consistent with existing psychoanalytic theory. The specific ego defenses can be understood as specialized capacities for deceiving others. The ubiquity of intrapsychic conflict between id wishes and superego/ego inhibitions may have been shaped by the constant choices that must be made between selfish strategies that offer a short-term benefit with a long-term social cost, versus altruistic strategies that exact a short-term cost but offer the possibility of a long-term reciprocity benefit. Other psychodynamic characteristics of the mind, oedipal wishes, castration anxiety, transference, and so forth, also require evolutionary explanations. In the process of the search for them, psychoanalysis may find the foundation in basic biology that it has long sought, and evolutionary biology may find that some of the evolved mechanisms that regulate human behavior have already been carefully studied by psychoanalysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024990120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024990120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2387763

AN - SCOPUS:0024990120

VL - 18

SP - 260

EP - 285

JO - Psychodynamic Psychiatry

JF - Psychodynamic Psychiatry

SN - 2162-2590

IS - 2

ER -