The evolution of urban regime theory

The challenge of conceptualization

Karen Mossberger, Gerry Stoker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

304 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Urban regime theory came to prominence with the publication of Clarence Stone's study of Atlanta in 1989, although earlier work by Fainstein and Fainstein (1983) and Elkin (1987) has also been influential. Since then, regime analysis has been extensively used to examine urban politics both inside North America and beyond. The authors argue that the wide use of regime analysis is a recognition of its value and insights but that some applications have stretched the concept beyond its original meaning to the point that the concept itself runs the risk of becoming meaningless and a source of theoretical confusion. By sifting through the extensive literature applying regime theory, the authors reestablish the core components of the concept and identify the key fields where it has made a contribution. It is suggested that regime analysis has helped considerably in reorienting the power debate in North America and in facilitating the analysis of politics beyond the formal institutions of the government outside North America.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)810-835
Number of pages26
JournalUrban Affairs Review
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

regime
urban politics
politics
analysis
North America
Values
literature
stone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

The evolution of urban regime theory : The challenge of conceptualization. / Mossberger, Karen; Stoker, Gerry.

In: Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2001, p. 810-835.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{78f7af7460d44ccc869879abfd8d5805,
title = "The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization",
abstract = "Urban regime theory came to prominence with the publication of Clarence Stone's study of Atlanta in 1989, although earlier work by Fainstein and Fainstein (1983) and Elkin (1987) has also been influential. Since then, regime analysis has been extensively used to examine urban politics both inside North America and beyond. The authors argue that the wide use of regime analysis is a recognition of its value and insights but that some applications have stretched the concept beyond its original meaning to the point that the concept itself runs the risk of becoming meaningless and a source of theoretical confusion. By sifting through the extensive literature applying regime theory, the authors reestablish the core components of the concept and identify the key fields where it has made a contribution. It is suggested that regime analysis has helped considerably in reorienting the power debate in North America and in facilitating the analysis of politics beyond the formal institutions of the government outside North America.",
author = "Karen Mossberger and Gerry Stoker",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1177/10780870122185109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "810--835",
journal = "Urban Affairs Review",
issn = "1078-0874",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evolution of urban regime theory

T2 - The challenge of conceptualization

AU - Mossberger, Karen

AU - Stoker, Gerry

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Urban regime theory came to prominence with the publication of Clarence Stone's study of Atlanta in 1989, although earlier work by Fainstein and Fainstein (1983) and Elkin (1987) has also been influential. Since then, regime analysis has been extensively used to examine urban politics both inside North America and beyond. The authors argue that the wide use of regime analysis is a recognition of its value and insights but that some applications have stretched the concept beyond its original meaning to the point that the concept itself runs the risk of becoming meaningless and a source of theoretical confusion. By sifting through the extensive literature applying regime theory, the authors reestablish the core components of the concept and identify the key fields where it has made a contribution. It is suggested that regime analysis has helped considerably in reorienting the power debate in North America and in facilitating the analysis of politics beyond the formal institutions of the government outside North America.

AB - Urban regime theory came to prominence with the publication of Clarence Stone's study of Atlanta in 1989, although earlier work by Fainstein and Fainstein (1983) and Elkin (1987) has also been influential. Since then, regime analysis has been extensively used to examine urban politics both inside North America and beyond. The authors argue that the wide use of regime analysis is a recognition of its value and insights but that some applications have stretched the concept beyond its original meaning to the point that the concept itself runs the risk of becoming meaningless and a source of theoretical confusion. By sifting through the extensive literature applying regime theory, the authors reestablish the core components of the concept and identify the key fields where it has made a contribution. It is suggested that regime analysis has helped considerably in reorienting the power debate in North America and in facilitating the analysis of politics beyond the formal institutions of the government outside North America.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034950863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034950863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/10780870122185109

DO - 10.1177/10780870122185109

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 810

EP - 835

JO - Urban Affairs Review

JF - Urban Affairs Review

SN - 1078-0874

IS - 6

ER -