The evolution of human cooperation

Coren L. Apicella, Joan Silk

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

Abstract

Darwin viewed cooperation as a perplexing challenge to his theory of natural selection. Natural selection generally favors the evolution of behaviors that enhance the fitness of individuals. Cooperative behavior, which increases the fitness of a recipient at the expense of the donor, contradicts this logic. William D. Hamilton helped to solve the puzzle when he showed that cooperation can evolve if cooperators direct benefits selectively to other cooperators (i.e. assortment). Kinship, group selection and the previous behavior of social partners all provide mechanisms for assortment (Figure 1), and kin selection and reciprocal altruism are the foundation of the kinds of cooperative behavior observed in many animals. Humans also bias cooperation in favor of kin and reciprocating partners, but the scope, scale, and variability of human cooperation greatly exceed that of other animals. Here, we introduce derived features of human cooperation in the context in which they originally evolved, and discuss the processes that may have shaped the evolution of our remarkable capacity for cooperation. We argue that culturally-evolved norms that specify how people should behave provide an evolutionarily novel mechanism for assortment, and play an important role in sustaining derived properties of cooperation in human groups. Coren Apicella and Joan Silk introduce the main factors that have shaped the evolution of the special cooperative capacity of humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)R447-R450
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 3 2019

Fingerprint

Animals
Silk
cooperatives
Genetic Selection
Cooperative Behavior
natural selection
Altruism
altruism
kin selection
kinship
silk
social behavior
animals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

The evolution of human cooperation. / Apicella, Coren L.; Silk, Joan.

In: Current Biology, Vol. 29, No. 11, 03.06.2019, p. R447-R450.

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

Apicella, Coren L. ; Silk, Joan. / The evolution of human cooperation. In: Current Biology. 2019 ; Vol. 29, No. 11. pp. R447-R450.
@article{332444f81bb5466cad935c79b47cf149,
title = "The evolution of human cooperation",
abstract = "Darwin viewed cooperation as a perplexing challenge to his theory of natural selection. Natural selection generally favors the evolution of behaviors that enhance the fitness of individuals. Cooperative behavior, which increases the fitness of a recipient at the expense of the donor, contradicts this logic. William D. Hamilton helped to solve the puzzle when he showed that cooperation can evolve if cooperators direct benefits selectively to other cooperators (i.e. assortment). Kinship, group selection and the previous behavior of social partners all provide mechanisms for assortment (Figure 1), and kin selection and reciprocal altruism are the foundation of the kinds of cooperative behavior observed in many animals. Humans also bias cooperation in favor of kin and reciprocating partners, but the scope, scale, and variability of human cooperation greatly exceed that of other animals. Here, we introduce derived features of human cooperation in the context in which they originally evolved, and discuss the processes that may have shaped the evolution of our remarkable capacity for cooperation. We argue that culturally-evolved norms that specify how people should behave provide an evolutionarily novel mechanism for assortment, and play an important role in sustaining derived properties of cooperation in human groups. Coren Apicella and Joan Silk introduce the main factors that have shaped the evolution of the special cooperative capacity of humans.",
author = "Apicella, {Coren L.} and Joan Silk",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "R447--R450",
journal = "Current Biology",
issn = "0960-9822",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evolution of human cooperation

AU - Apicella, Coren L.

AU - Silk, Joan

PY - 2019/6/3

Y1 - 2019/6/3

N2 - Darwin viewed cooperation as a perplexing challenge to his theory of natural selection. Natural selection generally favors the evolution of behaviors that enhance the fitness of individuals. Cooperative behavior, which increases the fitness of a recipient at the expense of the donor, contradicts this logic. William D. Hamilton helped to solve the puzzle when he showed that cooperation can evolve if cooperators direct benefits selectively to other cooperators (i.e. assortment). Kinship, group selection and the previous behavior of social partners all provide mechanisms for assortment (Figure 1), and kin selection and reciprocal altruism are the foundation of the kinds of cooperative behavior observed in many animals. Humans also bias cooperation in favor of kin and reciprocating partners, but the scope, scale, and variability of human cooperation greatly exceed that of other animals. Here, we introduce derived features of human cooperation in the context in which they originally evolved, and discuss the processes that may have shaped the evolution of our remarkable capacity for cooperation. We argue that culturally-evolved norms that specify how people should behave provide an evolutionarily novel mechanism for assortment, and play an important role in sustaining derived properties of cooperation in human groups. Coren Apicella and Joan Silk introduce the main factors that have shaped the evolution of the special cooperative capacity of humans.

AB - Darwin viewed cooperation as a perplexing challenge to his theory of natural selection. Natural selection generally favors the evolution of behaviors that enhance the fitness of individuals. Cooperative behavior, which increases the fitness of a recipient at the expense of the donor, contradicts this logic. William D. Hamilton helped to solve the puzzle when he showed that cooperation can evolve if cooperators direct benefits selectively to other cooperators (i.e. assortment). Kinship, group selection and the previous behavior of social partners all provide mechanisms for assortment (Figure 1), and kin selection and reciprocal altruism are the foundation of the kinds of cooperative behavior observed in many animals. Humans also bias cooperation in favor of kin and reciprocating partners, but the scope, scale, and variability of human cooperation greatly exceed that of other animals. Here, we introduce derived features of human cooperation in the context in which they originally evolved, and discuss the processes that may have shaped the evolution of our remarkable capacity for cooperation. We argue that culturally-evolved norms that specify how people should behave provide an evolutionarily novel mechanism for assortment, and play an important role in sustaining derived properties of cooperation in human groups. Coren Apicella and Joan Silk introduce the main factors that have shaped the evolution of the special cooperative capacity of humans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066283966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066283966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.036

DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.036

M3 - Short survey

VL - 29

SP - R447-R450

JO - Current Biology

JF - Current Biology

SN - 0960-9822

IS - 11

ER -