The evaluation of principals

What and how do states and urban districts assess leadership?

Ellen Goldring, Xiu Chen Cravens, Joseph Murphy, Andrew C. Porter, Stephen Elliott, Becca Carson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article we present results of a comprehensive review of principal leadership assessment practices in the United States. Our analyses of both the general content and the usage of 65 instruments, 56 at the district level and 9 at the state level, provided an in-depth look at what and how districts and states evaluate principals. Using the learning-centered leadership framework, we focused on identifying the congruence (or lack thereof) between documented assessment practices and the research-based criteria for effective leadership that are associated with improved school performance. Using an iterative and deductive process for instrument content analysis, we found that states and districts focused on a variety of performance areas (e.g., management, external environment, or personal traits) when evaluating their principals, with different formats at various levels of specificity. We also found very limited coverage of leadership behaviors that ensure rigorous curriculum and quality instruction, which are linked with schoolwide improvement for the ultimate purpose of enhanced student learning. In seeking information on how principals are evaluated, we found that in most cases, the practices of leadership assessment lacked justification and documentation in terms of the utility, psychometric properties, and accuracy of theinstruments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-39
Number of pages21
JournalElementary School Journal
Volume110
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

district
leadership
evaluation
psychometrics
learning
performance
documentation
content analysis
coverage
instruction
curriculum
lack
management
school
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

The evaluation of principals : What and how do states and urban districts assess leadership? / Goldring, Ellen; Cravens, Xiu Chen; Murphy, Joseph; Porter, Andrew C.; Elliott, Stephen; Carson, Becca.

In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 110, No. 1, 09.2009, p. 19-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goldring, Ellen ; Cravens, Xiu Chen ; Murphy, Joseph ; Porter, Andrew C. ; Elliott, Stephen ; Carson, Becca. / The evaluation of principals : What and how do states and urban districts assess leadership?. In: Elementary School Journal. 2009 ; Vol. 110, No. 1. pp. 19-39.
@article{42a93c3505eb4489a32903796a4f0d08,
title = "The evaluation of principals: What and how do states and urban districts assess leadership?",
abstract = "In this article we present results of a comprehensive review of principal leadership assessment practices in the United States. Our analyses of both the general content and the usage of 65 instruments, 56 at the district level and 9 at the state level, provided an in-depth look at what and how districts and states evaluate principals. Using the learning-centered leadership framework, we focused on identifying the congruence (or lack thereof) between documented assessment practices and the research-based criteria for effective leadership that are associated with improved school performance. Using an iterative and deductive process for instrument content analysis, we found that states and districts focused on a variety of performance areas (e.g., management, external environment, or personal traits) when evaluating their principals, with different formats at various levels of specificity. We also found very limited coverage of leadership behaviors that ensure rigorous curriculum and quality instruction, which are linked with schoolwide improvement for the ultimate purpose of enhanced student learning. In seeking information on how principals are evaluated, we found that in most cases, the practices of leadership assessment lacked justification and documentation in terms of the utility, psychometric properties, and accuracy of theinstruments.",
author = "Ellen Goldring and Cravens, {Xiu Chen} and Joseph Murphy and Porter, {Andrew C.} and Stephen Elliott and Becca Carson",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1086/598841",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "19--39",
journal = "Elementary School Journal",
issn = "0013-5984",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evaluation of principals

T2 - What and how do states and urban districts assess leadership?

AU - Goldring, Ellen

AU - Cravens, Xiu Chen

AU - Murphy, Joseph

AU - Porter, Andrew C.

AU - Elliott, Stephen

AU - Carson, Becca

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - In this article we present results of a comprehensive review of principal leadership assessment practices in the United States. Our analyses of both the general content and the usage of 65 instruments, 56 at the district level and 9 at the state level, provided an in-depth look at what and how districts and states evaluate principals. Using the learning-centered leadership framework, we focused on identifying the congruence (or lack thereof) between documented assessment practices and the research-based criteria for effective leadership that are associated with improved school performance. Using an iterative and deductive process for instrument content analysis, we found that states and districts focused on a variety of performance areas (e.g., management, external environment, or personal traits) when evaluating their principals, with different formats at various levels of specificity. We also found very limited coverage of leadership behaviors that ensure rigorous curriculum and quality instruction, which are linked with schoolwide improvement for the ultimate purpose of enhanced student learning. In seeking information on how principals are evaluated, we found that in most cases, the practices of leadership assessment lacked justification and documentation in terms of the utility, psychometric properties, and accuracy of theinstruments.

AB - In this article we present results of a comprehensive review of principal leadership assessment practices in the United States. Our analyses of both the general content and the usage of 65 instruments, 56 at the district level and 9 at the state level, provided an in-depth look at what and how districts and states evaluate principals. Using the learning-centered leadership framework, we focused on identifying the congruence (or lack thereof) between documented assessment practices and the research-based criteria for effective leadership that are associated with improved school performance. Using an iterative and deductive process for instrument content analysis, we found that states and districts focused on a variety of performance areas (e.g., management, external environment, or personal traits) when evaluating their principals, with different formats at various levels of specificity. We also found very limited coverage of leadership behaviors that ensure rigorous curriculum and quality instruction, which are linked with schoolwide improvement for the ultimate purpose of enhanced student learning. In seeking information on how principals are evaluated, we found that in most cases, the practices of leadership assessment lacked justification and documentation in terms of the utility, psychometric properties, and accuracy of theinstruments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349513045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349513045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/598841

DO - 10.1086/598841

M3 - Article

VL - 110

SP - 19

EP - 39

JO - Elementary School Journal

JF - Elementary School Journal

SN - 0013-5984

IS - 1

ER -