The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory

Thomas Greckhamer, Mirka Koro-Ljungberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since its original inception in the 1960s grounded theory has been widely used by many qualitative researchers. However, recently epistemologically different versions of grounded theory have been presented and this epistemological diversity among grounded theorists and the erosion of the method will be the major focus of this paper. The first section explores the question of what 'erosion' of grounded theory means for the practice of qualitative research and the epistemological assumptions embedded in different uses of grounded theory are discussed. Furthermore, three ways to use qualitative methods are conceptualized: epistemological, strategic and intuitive. Additionally, the first section describes the erosion that occurs when research methods are transferred from one epistemology to another. The second part of the paper raises the questions as to whether it is possible to transfer methods from one epistemological realm and theoretical stance to another one to do qualitative research situated therein and how the erosion of a method influences qualitative research. To elucidate these questions, examples will be drawn from grounded theory to illuminate the different uses of methods. Last, the authors ask why such a transfer would be attempted altogether. In this final part of the paper they discuss how grounded theory is used as a label, believing that much of the current popularization of grounded theory is based on power, privilege and authority.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)729-750
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

grounded theory
erosion
qualitative research
popularization
epistemology
qualitative method
privilege
research method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

The erosion of a method : Examples from grounded theory. / Greckhamer, Thomas; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka.

In: International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Vol. 18, No. 6, 11.2005, p. 729-750.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{41d57c7b11af45858e6b7de5720bff01,
title = "The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory",
abstract = "Since its original inception in the 1960s grounded theory has been widely used by many qualitative researchers. However, recently epistemologically different versions of grounded theory have been presented and this epistemological diversity among grounded theorists and the erosion of the method will be the major focus of this paper. The first section explores the question of what 'erosion' of grounded theory means for the practice of qualitative research and the epistemological assumptions embedded in different uses of grounded theory are discussed. Furthermore, three ways to use qualitative methods are conceptualized: epistemological, strategic and intuitive. Additionally, the first section describes the erosion that occurs when research methods are transferred from one epistemology to another. The second part of the paper raises the questions as to whether it is possible to transfer methods from one epistemological realm and theoretical stance to another one to do qualitative research situated therein and how the erosion of a method influences qualitative research. To elucidate these questions, examples will be drawn from grounded theory to illuminate the different uses of methods. Last, the authors ask why such a transfer would be attempted altogether. In this final part of the paper they discuss how grounded theory is used as a label, believing that much of the current popularization of grounded theory is based on power, privilege and authority.",
author = "Thomas Greckhamer and Mirka Koro-Ljungberg",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/09518390500298204",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "729--750",
journal = "International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education",
issn = "0951-8398",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The erosion of a method

T2 - Examples from grounded theory

AU - Greckhamer, Thomas

AU - Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - Since its original inception in the 1960s grounded theory has been widely used by many qualitative researchers. However, recently epistemologically different versions of grounded theory have been presented and this epistemological diversity among grounded theorists and the erosion of the method will be the major focus of this paper. The first section explores the question of what 'erosion' of grounded theory means for the practice of qualitative research and the epistemological assumptions embedded in different uses of grounded theory are discussed. Furthermore, three ways to use qualitative methods are conceptualized: epistemological, strategic and intuitive. Additionally, the first section describes the erosion that occurs when research methods are transferred from one epistemology to another. The second part of the paper raises the questions as to whether it is possible to transfer methods from one epistemological realm and theoretical stance to another one to do qualitative research situated therein and how the erosion of a method influences qualitative research. To elucidate these questions, examples will be drawn from grounded theory to illuminate the different uses of methods. Last, the authors ask why such a transfer would be attempted altogether. In this final part of the paper they discuss how grounded theory is used as a label, believing that much of the current popularization of grounded theory is based on power, privilege and authority.

AB - Since its original inception in the 1960s grounded theory has been widely used by many qualitative researchers. However, recently epistemologically different versions of grounded theory have been presented and this epistemological diversity among grounded theorists and the erosion of the method will be the major focus of this paper. The first section explores the question of what 'erosion' of grounded theory means for the practice of qualitative research and the epistemological assumptions embedded in different uses of grounded theory are discussed. Furthermore, three ways to use qualitative methods are conceptualized: epistemological, strategic and intuitive. Additionally, the first section describes the erosion that occurs when research methods are transferred from one epistemology to another. The second part of the paper raises the questions as to whether it is possible to transfer methods from one epistemological realm and theoretical stance to another one to do qualitative research situated therein and how the erosion of a method influences qualitative research. To elucidate these questions, examples will be drawn from grounded theory to illuminate the different uses of methods. Last, the authors ask why such a transfer would be attempted altogether. In this final part of the paper they discuss how grounded theory is used as a label, believing that much of the current popularization of grounded theory is based on power, privilege and authority.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27944501758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27944501758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09518390500298204

DO - 10.1080/09518390500298204

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:27944501758

VL - 18

SP - 729

EP - 750

JO - International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

JF - International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

SN - 0951-8398

IS - 6

ER -