Abstract

The endothelium is only now beginning to gain acceptance as a physiologically relevant organ with potential clinical significance. Yet the cell layer called the endothelium was first identified well over a century ago. In this chapter, we explore the circumstances leading to the slow recognition of the endothelium as a system with untapped diagnostic and therapeutic potential. We trace historically important steps toward increased interest in the endothelium, beginning with ancient discussions of the heart and blood vessels, and the conviction that blood derives from nutrition and is continually used up by the body. We see that, in Western medicine, the dominant culture of the Catholic Church impeded new discovery and instead emphasized reliance on accepted ideas for nearly 1,500 years. Only in the context of the Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century could anatomists such as William Harvey challenge prevailing dogma and reach the conclusion that blood circulates and that it does so through a system of connected vascular vessels. In this chapter, we examine those contributions and the developments that followed, slowly and gradually, the rise of new technologies for observation and the framing of new questions. We ask what caused researchers to focus on cells and tissues, and then, during the last part of the nineteenth century, to identify endothelial cells (ECs) as a unique structure, distinguishable structurally, physiologically, and developmentally from the epithelium that researchers initially had seen as closely connected to it. Then, we explore what implications the identification and naming of this particular set of cells had for the biomedical sciences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEndothelial Biomedicine
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages3-20
Number of pages18
Volume9780521853767
ISBN (Print)9780511546198, 0521853761, 9780521853767
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Endothelium
Blood
History
Religious buildings
Endothelial cells
Blood vessels
Nutrition
Medicine
Blood Vessels
Cells
Research Personnel
Tissue
Anatomists
Epithelium
Endothelial Cells
Observation
Technology
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Laubichler, M., Aird, W. C., & Maienschein, J. (2007). The endothelium in history. In Endothelial Biomedicine (Vol. 9780521853767, pp. 3-20). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546198.002

The endothelium in history. / Laubichler, Manfred; Aird, William C.; Maienschein, Jane.

Endothelial Biomedicine. Vol. 9780521853767 Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 3-20.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Laubichler, M, Aird, WC & Maienschein, J 2007, The endothelium in history. in Endothelial Biomedicine. vol. 9780521853767, Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546198.002
Laubichler M, Aird WC, Maienschein J. The endothelium in history. In Endothelial Biomedicine. Vol. 9780521853767. Cambridge University Press. 2007. p. 3-20 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546198.002
Laubichler, Manfred ; Aird, William C. ; Maienschein, Jane. / The endothelium in history. Endothelial Biomedicine. Vol. 9780521853767 Cambridge University Press, 2007. pp. 3-20
@inbook{d8fea4f0d096400bb1284e9a96f8df8f,
title = "The endothelium in history",
abstract = "The endothelium is only now beginning to gain acceptance as a physiologically relevant organ with potential clinical significance. Yet the cell layer called the endothelium was first identified well over a century ago. In this chapter, we explore the circumstances leading to the slow recognition of the endothelium as a system with untapped diagnostic and therapeutic potential. We trace historically important steps toward increased interest in the endothelium, beginning with ancient discussions of the heart and blood vessels, and the conviction that blood derives from nutrition and is continually used up by the body. We see that, in Western medicine, the dominant culture of the Catholic Church impeded new discovery and instead emphasized reliance on accepted ideas for nearly 1,500 years. Only in the context of the Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century could anatomists such as William Harvey challenge prevailing dogma and reach the conclusion that blood circulates and that it does so through a system of connected vascular vessels. In this chapter, we examine those contributions and the developments that followed, slowly and gradually, the rise of new technologies for observation and the framing of new questions. We ask what caused researchers to focus on cells and tissues, and then, during the last part of the nineteenth century, to identify endothelial cells (ECs) as a unique structure, distinguishable structurally, physiologically, and developmentally from the epithelium that researchers initially had seen as closely connected to it. Then, we explore what implications the identification and naming of this particular set of cells had for the biomedical sciences.",
author = "Manfred Laubichler and Aird, {William C.} and Jane Maienschein",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511546198.002",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511546198",
volume = "9780521853767",
pages = "3--20",
booktitle = "Endothelial Biomedicine",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The endothelium in history

AU - Laubichler, Manfred

AU - Aird, William C.

AU - Maienschein, Jane

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - The endothelium is only now beginning to gain acceptance as a physiologically relevant organ with potential clinical significance. Yet the cell layer called the endothelium was first identified well over a century ago. In this chapter, we explore the circumstances leading to the slow recognition of the endothelium as a system with untapped diagnostic and therapeutic potential. We trace historically important steps toward increased interest in the endothelium, beginning with ancient discussions of the heart and blood vessels, and the conviction that blood derives from nutrition and is continually used up by the body. We see that, in Western medicine, the dominant culture of the Catholic Church impeded new discovery and instead emphasized reliance on accepted ideas for nearly 1,500 years. Only in the context of the Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century could anatomists such as William Harvey challenge prevailing dogma and reach the conclusion that blood circulates and that it does so through a system of connected vascular vessels. In this chapter, we examine those contributions and the developments that followed, slowly and gradually, the rise of new technologies for observation and the framing of new questions. We ask what caused researchers to focus on cells and tissues, and then, during the last part of the nineteenth century, to identify endothelial cells (ECs) as a unique structure, distinguishable structurally, physiologically, and developmentally from the epithelium that researchers initially had seen as closely connected to it. Then, we explore what implications the identification and naming of this particular set of cells had for the biomedical sciences.

AB - The endothelium is only now beginning to gain acceptance as a physiologically relevant organ with potential clinical significance. Yet the cell layer called the endothelium was first identified well over a century ago. In this chapter, we explore the circumstances leading to the slow recognition of the endothelium as a system with untapped diagnostic and therapeutic potential. We trace historically important steps toward increased interest in the endothelium, beginning with ancient discussions of the heart and blood vessels, and the conviction that blood derives from nutrition and is continually used up by the body. We see that, in Western medicine, the dominant culture of the Catholic Church impeded new discovery and instead emphasized reliance on accepted ideas for nearly 1,500 years. Only in the context of the Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century could anatomists such as William Harvey challenge prevailing dogma and reach the conclusion that blood circulates and that it does so through a system of connected vascular vessels. In this chapter, we examine those contributions and the developments that followed, slowly and gradually, the rise of new technologies for observation and the framing of new questions. We ask what caused researchers to focus on cells and tissues, and then, during the last part of the nineteenth century, to identify endothelial cells (ECs) as a unique structure, distinguishable structurally, physiologically, and developmentally from the epithelium that researchers initially had seen as closely connected to it. Then, we explore what implications the identification and naming of this particular set of cells had for the biomedical sciences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928860873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928860873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511546198.002

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511546198.002

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511546198

SN - 0521853761

SN - 9780521853767

VL - 9780521853767

SP - 3

EP - 20

BT - Endothelial Biomedicine

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -