The empirical relationship between trade, growth and the environment

Lewis R. Gale, Jose Mendez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This note reestimates Grossman and Krueger's (1993) SO2 emissions regression including regressors to capture the effects of scale, trade and trade policy. Several new results are obtained. Increases in economic activity have a negative effect on the environment separate from changes in per capita income, whose relation to the environment is now positive and linear not inverted U-shaped. The trade policy measure is not significant, but its effect is ambiguous a priori. Finally, in line with specialization patterns based on traditional sources of comparative advantage, pollution rises with the capital abundance of a country (since this favors capital-intensive and generally dirtier industries) and falls with increases in labor and land abundance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-61
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Review of Economics and Finance
Volume7
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Trade and growth
Trade policy
Economic activity
Per capita income
Inverted-U
Comparative advantage
Policy measures
Pollution
Industry
Labor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance

Cite this

The empirical relationship between trade, growth and the environment. / Gale, Lewis R.; Mendez, Jose.

In: International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1998, p. 53-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3dbb4c01077a49ec873a330f9d01ae36,
title = "The empirical relationship between trade, growth and the environment",
abstract = "This note reestimates Grossman and Krueger's (1993) SO2 emissions regression including regressors to capture the effects of scale, trade and trade policy. Several new results are obtained. Increases in economic activity have a negative effect on the environment separate from changes in per capita income, whose relation to the environment is now positive and linear not inverted U-shaped. The trade policy measure is not significant, but its effect is ambiguous a priori. Finally, in line with specialization patterns based on traditional sources of comparative advantage, pollution rises with the capital abundance of a country (since this favors capital-intensive and generally dirtier industries) and falls with increases in labor and land abundance.",
author = "Gale, {Lewis R.} and Jose Mendez",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "53--61",
journal = "International Review of Economics and Finance",
issn = "1059-0560",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The empirical relationship between trade, growth and the environment

AU - Gale, Lewis R.

AU - Mendez, Jose

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - This note reestimates Grossman and Krueger's (1993) SO2 emissions regression including regressors to capture the effects of scale, trade and trade policy. Several new results are obtained. Increases in economic activity have a negative effect on the environment separate from changes in per capita income, whose relation to the environment is now positive and linear not inverted U-shaped. The trade policy measure is not significant, but its effect is ambiguous a priori. Finally, in line with specialization patterns based on traditional sources of comparative advantage, pollution rises with the capital abundance of a country (since this favors capital-intensive and generally dirtier industries) and falls with increases in labor and land abundance.

AB - This note reestimates Grossman and Krueger's (1993) SO2 emissions regression including regressors to capture the effects of scale, trade and trade policy. Several new results are obtained. Increases in economic activity have a negative effect on the environment separate from changes in per capita income, whose relation to the environment is now positive and linear not inverted U-shaped. The trade policy measure is not significant, but its effect is ambiguous a priori. Finally, in line with specialization patterns based on traditional sources of comparative advantage, pollution rises with the capital abundance of a country (since this favors capital-intensive and generally dirtier industries) and falls with increases in labor and land abundance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032325522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032325522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 53

EP - 61

JO - International Review of Economics and Finance

JF - International Review of Economics and Finance

SN - 1059-0560

IS - 1

ER -