El surgimiento de políticas de rendición de cuentas con consecuencias severas en la formación docente: Un estudio de las regulaciones propuestas por el departamento de educación EE.UU

Translated title of the contribution: The emergence of high-stakes accountability policies in teacher preparation: An examination of the U.S. Department of education’s proposed regulations

Maria Tatto, Corey Savage, Wei Liao, Stefanie L. Marshall, Paul Goldblatt, Leonardo M. Contreras

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using a sociological framework this article explores the emergence and possible consequences of the 2015 U.S. Department of Education’s proposed federal regulatory policy on teacher education programs and alternative route providers. After describing the key features of the policy, we examine the research literature looking for evidence of the merits of accountability policies in improving teacher education and preparation quality and outcomes. Although there is some research evidence that increased accountability measures may indeed contribute to improving the quality and outcomes of teacher education and preparation, the conditions under which this happens are not straightforward. While the stated aim of the regulatory policy, to ultimately advance student learning, finds widespread support in the education community, research evidence points to a number of validity problems with the overall policy. Of particular concern is the policy’s attempts at establishing a direct link between teacher preparation graduates’ employment and pupil achievement. The policy as conceived could negatively impact program norms and resources and undermine the development of teachers’ human, cultural, and social capital. We discuss the accreditation challenges that the policy is likely to confront and implications for the future of teacher education and preparation accountability.

Original languageSpanish
Article number21
JournalEducation Policy Analysis Archives
Volume24
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 22 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

regulation
responsibility
examination
teacher
education
regulatory policy
evidence
community research
cultural capital
accreditation
human capital
social capital
pupil
graduate
resources
learning
student

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Effectiveness
  • Teacher preparation
  • United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

El surgimiento de políticas de rendición de cuentas con consecuencias severas en la formación docente : Un estudio de las regulaciones propuestas por el departamento de educación EE.UU. / Tatto, Maria; Savage, Corey; Liao, Wei; Marshall, Stefanie L.; Goldblatt, Paul; Contreras, Leonardo M.

In: Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol. 24, 21, 22.02.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{20822a63eabb4ddb97b84f6648ca3958,
title = "El surgimiento de pol{\'i}ticas de rendici{\'o}n de cuentas con consecuencias severas en la formaci{\'o}n docente: Un estudio de las regulaciones propuestas por el departamento de educaci{\'o}n EE.UU",
abstract = "Using a sociological framework this article explores the emergence and possible consequences of the 2015 U.S. Department of Education’s proposed federal regulatory policy on teacher education programs and alternative route providers. After describing the key features of the policy, we examine the research literature looking for evidence of the merits of accountability policies in improving teacher education and preparation quality and outcomes. Although there is some research evidence that increased accountability measures may indeed contribute to improving the quality and outcomes of teacher education and preparation, the conditions under which this happens are not straightforward. While the stated aim of the regulatory policy, to ultimately advance student learning, finds widespread support in the education community, research evidence points to a number of validity problems with the overall policy. Of particular concern is the policy’s attempts at establishing a direct link between teacher preparation graduates’ employment and pupil achievement. The policy as conceived could negatively impact program norms and resources and undermine the development of teachers’ human, cultural, and social capital. We discuss the accreditation challenges that the policy is likely to confront and implications for the future of teacher education and preparation accountability.",
keywords = "Accountability, Effectiveness, Teacher preparation, United States",
author = "Maria Tatto and Corey Savage and Wei Liao and Marshall, {Stefanie L.} and Paul Goldblatt and Contreras, {Leonardo M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "22",
doi = "10.14507/epaa.24.2322",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "24",
journal = "Education Policy Analysis Archives",
issn = "1068-2341",
publisher = "Arizona State University",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - El surgimiento de políticas de rendición de cuentas con consecuencias severas en la formación docente

T2 - Un estudio de las regulaciones propuestas por el departamento de educación EE.UU

AU - Tatto, Maria

AU - Savage, Corey

AU - Liao, Wei

AU - Marshall, Stefanie L.

AU - Goldblatt, Paul

AU - Contreras, Leonardo M.

PY - 2016/2/22

Y1 - 2016/2/22

N2 - Using a sociological framework this article explores the emergence and possible consequences of the 2015 U.S. Department of Education’s proposed federal regulatory policy on teacher education programs and alternative route providers. After describing the key features of the policy, we examine the research literature looking for evidence of the merits of accountability policies in improving teacher education and preparation quality and outcomes. Although there is some research evidence that increased accountability measures may indeed contribute to improving the quality and outcomes of teacher education and preparation, the conditions under which this happens are not straightforward. While the stated aim of the regulatory policy, to ultimately advance student learning, finds widespread support in the education community, research evidence points to a number of validity problems with the overall policy. Of particular concern is the policy’s attempts at establishing a direct link between teacher preparation graduates’ employment and pupil achievement. The policy as conceived could negatively impact program norms and resources and undermine the development of teachers’ human, cultural, and social capital. We discuss the accreditation challenges that the policy is likely to confront and implications for the future of teacher education and preparation accountability.

AB - Using a sociological framework this article explores the emergence and possible consequences of the 2015 U.S. Department of Education’s proposed federal regulatory policy on teacher education programs and alternative route providers. After describing the key features of the policy, we examine the research literature looking for evidence of the merits of accountability policies in improving teacher education and preparation quality and outcomes. Although there is some research evidence that increased accountability measures may indeed contribute to improving the quality and outcomes of teacher education and preparation, the conditions under which this happens are not straightforward. While the stated aim of the regulatory policy, to ultimately advance student learning, finds widespread support in the education community, research evidence points to a number of validity problems with the overall policy. Of particular concern is the policy’s attempts at establishing a direct link between teacher preparation graduates’ employment and pupil achievement. The policy as conceived could negatively impact program norms and resources and undermine the development of teachers’ human, cultural, and social capital. We discuss the accreditation challenges that the policy is likely to confront and implications for the future of teacher education and preparation accountability.

KW - Accountability

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Teacher preparation

KW - United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959495158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959495158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14507/epaa.24.2322

DO - 10.14507/epaa.24.2322

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84959495158

VL - 24

JO - Education Policy Analysis Archives

JF - Education Policy Analysis Archives

SN - 1068-2341

M1 - 21

ER -