The effects of walking and cycling computer workstations on keyboard and mouse performance

Leon Straker, James Levine, Amity Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effects of active workstation designs on speed and error during typing, mouse pointing, and combined type and mouse-use tasks. Background: Office ergonomics has focused on musculoskeletal disorder prevention; however, increasing computer-based work also increases health risks associated with inactivity. Workstations allowing computer users to walk or cycle while performing computer tasks have been shown to demand sufficient energy expenditure to result in significant health benefits. However the performance effects of being active while using a computer have not been documented. Method: Thirty office workers (16 female, 15 touch typists) performed standardized computer tasks in six workstation conditions: sitting, standing, walking at 1.6 km/h and 3.2 km/h, and cycling at 5 and 30 watts. Performance, perceived performance, and heart rate were measured. Results: Computer task performance was lower when walking and slightly lower when cycling, compared with chair sitting. Standing performance was not different from sitting performance. Mouse performance was more affected than typing performance. Performance decrements were equal for females and males and for touch typists and nontouch typists. Conclusion: Performance decrements maybe related to both biomechanical and cognitive processes. Active workstations may be less suitable for mouse-intensive work and susceptible users. Application: Although active workstations may result in some decrement in performance, their ability to increase daily energy expenditure may make them a feasible solution for workplace inactivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)831-844
Number of pages14
JournalHuman Factors
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Computer workstations
workstation
Walking
performance
typist
Touch
Energy Metabolism
Health risks
Ergonomics
Aptitude
Human Engineering
Task Performance and Analysis
Insurance Benefits
Workplace
expenditures
Health
Heart Rate
female worker
energy shortage
health risk

Keywords

  • Active office
  • Anthropometry
  • Biomechanics
  • Computer skill performance
  • Computer systems
  • Human-computer interaction (HCI)
  • Loading
  • Physical work
  • Psychomotor processes
  • Skill development
  • Skill maintenance
  • Treadmill desk
  • Work physiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

The effects of walking and cycling computer workstations on keyboard and mouse performance. / Straker, Leon; Levine, James; Campbell, Amity.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 51, No. 6, 12.2009, p. 831-844.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Straker, Leon ; Levine, James ; Campbell, Amity. / The effects of walking and cycling computer workstations on keyboard and mouse performance. In: Human Factors. 2009 ; Vol. 51, No. 6. pp. 831-844.
@article{28c85d1ea9244ab3a3f09a3224961d1a,
title = "The effects of walking and cycling computer workstations on keyboard and mouse performance",
abstract = "Objective: This study aimed to determine the effects of active workstation designs on speed and error during typing, mouse pointing, and combined type and mouse-use tasks. Background: Office ergonomics has focused on musculoskeletal disorder prevention; however, increasing computer-based work also increases health risks associated with inactivity. Workstations allowing computer users to walk or cycle while performing computer tasks have been shown to demand sufficient energy expenditure to result in significant health benefits. However the performance effects of being active while using a computer have not been documented. Method: Thirty office workers (16 female, 15 touch typists) performed standardized computer tasks in six workstation conditions: sitting, standing, walking at 1.6 km/h and 3.2 km/h, and cycling at 5 and 30 watts. Performance, perceived performance, and heart rate were measured. Results: Computer task performance was lower when walking and slightly lower when cycling, compared with chair sitting. Standing performance was not different from sitting performance. Mouse performance was more affected than typing performance. Performance decrements were equal for females and males and for touch typists and nontouch typists. Conclusion: Performance decrements maybe related to both biomechanical and cognitive processes. Active workstations may be less suitable for mouse-intensive work and susceptible users. Application: Although active workstations may result in some decrement in performance, their ability to increase daily energy expenditure may make them a feasible solution for workplace inactivity.",
keywords = "Active office, Anthropometry, Biomechanics, Computer skill performance, Computer systems, Human-computer interaction (HCI), Loading, Physical work, Psychomotor processes, Skill development, Skill maintenance, Treadmill desk, Work physiology",
author = "Leon Straker and James Levine and Amity Campbell",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0018720810362079",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "831--844",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of walking and cycling computer workstations on keyboard and mouse performance

AU - Straker, Leon

AU - Levine, James

AU - Campbell, Amity

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Objective: This study aimed to determine the effects of active workstation designs on speed and error during typing, mouse pointing, and combined type and mouse-use tasks. Background: Office ergonomics has focused on musculoskeletal disorder prevention; however, increasing computer-based work also increases health risks associated with inactivity. Workstations allowing computer users to walk or cycle while performing computer tasks have been shown to demand sufficient energy expenditure to result in significant health benefits. However the performance effects of being active while using a computer have not been documented. Method: Thirty office workers (16 female, 15 touch typists) performed standardized computer tasks in six workstation conditions: sitting, standing, walking at 1.6 km/h and 3.2 km/h, and cycling at 5 and 30 watts. Performance, perceived performance, and heart rate were measured. Results: Computer task performance was lower when walking and slightly lower when cycling, compared with chair sitting. Standing performance was not different from sitting performance. Mouse performance was more affected than typing performance. Performance decrements were equal for females and males and for touch typists and nontouch typists. Conclusion: Performance decrements maybe related to both biomechanical and cognitive processes. Active workstations may be less suitable for mouse-intensive work and susceptible users. Application: Although active workstations may result in some decrement in performance, their ability to increase daily energy expenditure may make them a feasible solution for workplace inactivity.

AB - Objective: This study aimed to determine the effects of active workstation designs on speed and error during typing, mouse pointing, and combined type and mouse-use tasks. Background: Office ergonomics has focused on musculoskeletal disorder prevention; however, increasing computer-based work also increases health risks associated with inactivity. Workstations allowing computer users to walk or cycle while performing computer tasks have been shown to demand sufficient energy expenditure to result in significant health benefits. However the performance effects of being active while using a computer have not been documented. Method: Thirty office workers (16 female, 15 touch typists) performed standardized computer tasks in six workstation conditions: sitting, standing, walking at 1.6 km/h and 3.2 km/h, and cycling at 5 and 30 watts. Performance, perceived performance, and heart rate were measured. Results: Computer task performance was lower when walking and slightly lower when cycling, compared with chair sitting. Standing performance was not different from sitting performance. Mouse performance was more affected than typing performance. Performance decrements were equal for females and males and for touch typists and nontouch typists. Conclusion: Performance decrements maybe related to both biomechanical and cognitive processes. Active workstations may be less suitable for mouse-intensive work and susceptible users. Application: Although active workstations may result in some decrement in performance, their ability to increase daily energy expenditure may make them a feasible solution for workplace inactivity.

KW - Active office

KW - Anthropometry

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Computer skill performance

KW - Computer systems

KW - Human-computer interaction (HCI)

KW - Loading

KW - Physical work

KW - Psychomotor processes

KW - Skill development

KW - Skill maintenance

KW - Treadmill desk

KW - Work physiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950272434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950272434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018720810362079

DO - 10.1177/0018720810362079

M3 - Article

C2 - 20415158

AN - SCOPUS:77950272434

VL - 51

SP - 831

EP - 844

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 6

ER -