The effects of urbanization on population density, occupancy, and detection probability of wild felids

Jesse Lewis, Kenneth A. Logan, Mat W. Alldredge, Larissa L. Bailey, Sue Vandewoude, Kevin R. Crooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Urbanization is a primary driver of landscape conversion, with far-reaching effects on landscape pattern and process, particularly related to the population characteristics of animals. Urbanization can alter animal movement and habitat quality, both of which can influence population abundance and persistence. We evaluated three important population characteristics (population density, site occupancy, and species detection probability) of a medium-sized and a large carnivore across varying levels of urbanization. Specifically, we studied bobcat and puma populations across wildland, exurban development, and wildland-urban interface (WUI) sampling grids to test hypotheses evaluating how urbanization affects wild felid populations and their prey. Exurban development appeared to have a greater impact on felid populations than did habitat adjacent to a major urban area (i.e., WUI); estimates of population density for both bobcats and pumas were lower in areas of exurban development compared to wildland areas, whereas population density was similar between WUI and wildland habitat. Bobcats and pumas were less likely to be detected in habitat as the amount of human disturbance associated with residential development increased at a site, which was potentially related to reduced habitat quality resulting from urbanization. However, occupancy of both felids was similar between grids in both study areas, indicating that this population metric was less sensitive than density. At the scale of the sampling grid, detection probability for bobcats in urbanized habitat was greater than in wildland areas, potentially due to restrictive movement corridors and funneling of animal movements in landscapes influenced by urbanization. Occupancy of important felid prey (cottontail rabbits and mule deer) was similar across levels of urbanization, although elk occupancy was lower in urbanized areas. Our study indicates that the conservation of medium-and large-sized felids associated with urbanization likely will be most successful if large areas of wildland habitat are maintained, even in close proximity to urban areas, and wildland habitat is not converted to low-density residential development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1880-1895
Number of pages16
JournalEcological Applications
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

felid
urbanization
population density
habitat
population characteristics
residential development
habitat quality
animal
urban area
effect
detection
sampling
carnivore
deer
persistence
disturbance

Keywords

  • Bobcat
  • Detection probability
  • Exurban landscape
  • Lynx rufus
  • Mark-resight
  • Mountain lion
  • Occupancy
  • Population density
  • Puma concolor
  • Urbanization
  • Wildland-urban interface

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

The effects of urbanization on population density, occupancy, and detection probability of wild felids. / Lewis, Jesse; Logan, Kenneth A.; Alldredge, Mat W.; Bailey, Larissa L.; Vandewoude, Sue; Crooks, Kevin R.

In: Ecological Applications, Vol. 25, No. 7, 01.10.2015, p. 1880-1895.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewis, Jesse ; Logan, Kenneth A. ; Alldredge, Mat W. ; Bailey, Larissa L. ; Vandewoude, Sue ; Crooks, Kevin R. / The effects of urbanization on population density, occupancy, and detection probability of wild felids. In: Ecological Applications. 2015 ; Vol. 25, No. 7. pp. 1880-1895.
@article{5700dbf2a0ac4fd2989cd092dedf4b3f,
title = "The effects of urbanization on population density, occupancy, and detection probability of wild felids",
abstract = "Urbanization is a primary driver of landscape conversion, with far-reaching effects on landscape pattern and process, particularly related to the population characteristics of animals. Urbanization can alter animal movement and habitat quality, both of which can influence population abundance and persistence. We evaluated three important population characteristics (population density, site occupancy, and species detection probability) of a medium-sized and a large carnivore across varying levels of urbanization. Specifically, we studied bobcat and puma populations across wildland, exurban development, and wildland-urban interface (WUI) sampling grids to test hypotheses evaluating how urbanization affects wild felid populations and their prey. Exurban development appeared to have a greater impact on felid populations than did habitat adjacent to a major urban area (i.e., WUI); estimates of population density for both bobcats and pumas were lower in areas of exurban development compared to wildland areas, whereas population density was similar between WUI and wildland habitat. Bobcats and pumas were less likely to be detected in habitat as the amount of human disturbance associated with residential development increased at a site, which was potentially related to reduced habitat quality resulting from urbanization. However, occupancy of both felids was similar between grids in both study areas, indicating that this population metric was less sensitive than density. At the scale of the sampling grid, detection probability for bobcats in urbanized habitat was greater than in wildland areas, potentially due to restrictive movement corridors and funneling of animal movements in landscapes influenced by urbanization. Occupancy of important felid prey (cottontail rabbits and mule deer) was similar across levels of urbanization, although elk occupancy was lower in urbanized areas. Our study indicates that the conservation of medium-and large-sized felids associated with urbanization likely will be most successful if large areas of wildland habitat are maintained, even in close proximity to urban areas, and wildland habitat is not converted to low-density residential development.",
keywords = "Bobcat, Detection probability, Exurban landscape, Lynx rufus, Mark-resight, Mountain lion, Occupancy, Population density, Puma concolor, Urbanization, Wildland-urban interface",
author = "Jesse Lewis and Logan, {Kenneth A.} and Alldredge, {Mat W.} and Bailey, {Larissa L.} and Sue Vandewoude and Crooks, {Kevin R.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1890/14-1664.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1880--1895",
journal = "Ecological Appplications",
issn = "1051-0761",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of urbanization on population density, occupancy, and detection probability of wild felids

AU - Lewis, Jesse

AU - Logan, Kenneth A.

AU - Alldredge, Mat W.

AU - Bailey, Larissa L.

AU - Vandewoude, Sue

AU - Crooks, Kevin R.

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Urbanization is a primary driver of landscape conversion, with far-reaching effects on landscape pattern and process, particularly related to the population characteristics of animals. Urbanization can alter animal movement and habitat quality, both of which can influence population abundance and persistence. We evaluated three important population characteristics (population density, site occupancy, and species detection probability) of a medium-sized and a large carnivore across varying levels of urbanization. Specifically, we studied bobcat and puma populations across wildland, exurban development, and wildland-urban interface (WUI) sampling grids to test hypotheses evaluating how urbanization affects wild felid populations and their prey. Exurban development appeared to have a greater impact on felid populations than did habitat adjacent to a major urban area (i.e., WUI); estimates of population density for both bobcats and pumas were lower in areas of exurban development compared to wildland areas, whereas population density was similar between WUI and wildland habitat. Bobcats and pumas were less likely to be detected in habitat as the amount of human disturbance associated with residential development increased at a site, which was potentially related to reduced habitat quality resulting from urbanization. However, occupancy of both felids was similar between grids in both study areas, indicating that this population metric was less sensitive than density. At the scale of the sampling grid, detection probability for bobcats in urbanized habitat was greater than in wildland areas, potentially due to restrictive movement corridors and funneling of animal movements in landscapes influenced by urbanization. Occupancy of important felid prey (cottontail rabbits and mule deer) was similar across levels of urbanization, although elk occupancy was lower in urbanized areas. Our study indicates that the conservation of medium-and large-sized felids associated with urbanization likely will be most successful if large areas of wildland habitat are maintained, even in close proximity to urban areas, and wildland habitat is not converted to low-density residential development.

AB - Urbanization is a primary driver of landscape conversion, with far-reaching effects on landscape pattern and process, particularly related to the population characteristics of animals. Urbanization can alter animal movement and habitat quality, both of which can influence population abundance and persistence. We evaluated three important population characteristics (population density, site occupancy, and species detection probability) of a medium-sized and a large carnivore across varying levels of urbanization. Specifically, we studied bobcat and puma populations across wildland, exurban development, and wildland-urban interface (WUI) sampling grids to test hypotheses evaluating how urbanization affects wild felid populations and their prey. Exurban development appeared to have a greater impact on felid populations than did habitat adjacent to a major urban area (i.e., WUI); estimates of population density for both bobcats and pumas were lower in areas of exurban development compared to wildland areas, whereas population density was similar between WUI and wildland habitat. Bobcats and pumas were less likely to be detected in habitat as the amount of human disturbance associated with residential development increased at a site, which was potentially related to reduced habitat quality resulting from urbanization. However, occupancy of both felids was similar between grids in both study areas, indicating that this population metric was less sensitive than density. At the scale of the sampling grid, detection probability for bobcats in urbanized habitat was greater than in wildland areas, potentially due to restrictive movement corridors and funneling of animal movements in landscapes influenced by urbanization. Occupancy of important felid prey (cottontail rabbits and mule deer) was similar across levels of urbanization, although elk occupancy was lower in urbanized areas. Our study indicates that the conservation of medium-and large-sized felids associated with urbanization likely will be most successful if large areas of wildland habitat are maintained, even in close proximity to urban areas, and wildland habitat is not converted to low-density residential development.

KW - Bobcat

KW - Detection probability

KW - Exurban landscape

KW - Lynx rufus

KW - Mark-resight

KW - Mountain lion

KW - Occupancy

KW - Population density

KW - Puma concolor

KW - Urbanization

KW - Wildland-urban interface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943625026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943625026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1890/14-1664.1

DO - 10.1890/14-1664.1

M3 - Article

C2 - 26591454

AN - SCOPUS:84943625026

VL - 25

SP - 1880

EP - 1895

JO - Ecological Appplications

JF - Ecological Appplications

SN - 1051-0761

IS - 7

ER -