The effects of procedural injustice during police–citizen encounters

a factorial vignette study

Michael Reisig, Ryan D. Mays, Cody Telep

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study tested the effect of procedural injustice relative to being sanctioned by police on a variety of outcome measures, such as decision acceptance and immediate compliance, in two types of police–citizen encounters, traffic stops and noise complaints. Methods: A factorial vignette design was used to determine the effect that the manipulations (i.e., procedural injustice and receiving a citation) had on the dependent variables. Participants (N = 594) were randomly assigned one vignette scenario with four possible conditions. After reading the hypothetical encounter, closed-ended survey items were administered to participants. Results: The standardized regression coefficients from the ordinal regression models revealed that participants who were administered the procedural injustice stimuli are less satisfied with how the police resolved the encounter, reported that they are less likely to follow the police directives, said they are less willing to accept the officer’s decisions, and are more likely to wish the police had handled the situation differently. This pattern of findings was consistent in both types of police encounters. Importantly, support was also found for the hypothesis that procedural injustice is more salient in predicting outcomes than whether a citation is issued. Conclusions: The results support the process-based model of regulation and serve to underscore the influence of unfair police processes on encounter-specific outcome variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Criminology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 7 2017

Fingerprint

police
regression
complaint
manipulation
stimulus
acceptance
traffic
scenario
regulation

Keywords

  • Compliance
  • Police encounters
  • Satisfaction with police
  • Traffic stops
  • Vignettes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

@article{357806808f1f4f608102384fadb2fb8a,
title = "The effects of procedural injustice during police–citizen encounters: a factorial vignette study",
abstract = "Objectives: This study tested the effect of procedural injustice relative to being sanctioned by police on a variety of outcome measures, such as decision acceptance and immediate compliance, in two types of police–citizen encounters, traffic stops and noise complaints. Methods: A factorial vignette design was used to determine the effect that the manipulations (i.e., procedural injustice and receiving a citation) had on the dependent variables. Participants (N = 594) were randomly assigned one vignette scenario with four possible conditions. After reading the hypothetical encounter, closed-ended survey items were administered to participants. Results: The standardized regression coefficients from the ordinal regression models revealed that participants who were administered the procedural injustice stimuli are less satisfied with how the police resolved the encounter, reported that they are less likely to follow the police directives, said they are less willing to accept the officer’s decisions, and are more likely to wish the police had handled the situation differently. This pattern of findings was consistent in both types of police encounters. Importantly, support was also found for the hypothesis that procedural injustice is more salient in predicting outcomes than whether a citation is issued. Conclusions: The results support the process-based model of regulation and serve to underscore the influence of unfair police processes on encounter-specific outcome variables.",
keywords = "Compliance, Police encounters, Satisfaction with police, Traffic stops, Vignettes",
author = "Michael Reisig and Mays, {Ryan D.} and Cody Telep",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s11292-017-9307-1",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Criminology",
issn = "1573-3750",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of procedural injustice during police–citizen encounters

T2 - a factorial vignette study

AU - Reisig, Michael

AU - Mays, Ryan D.

AU - Telep, Cody

PY - 2017/10/7

Y1 - 2017/10/7

N2 - Objectives: This study tested the effect of procedural injustice relative to being sanctioned by police on a variety of outcome measures, such as decision acceptance and immediate compliance, in two types of police–citizen encounters, traffic stops and noise complaints. Methods: A factorial vignette design was used to determine the effect that the manipulations (i.e., procedural injustice and receiving a citation) had on the dependent variables. Participants (N = 594) were randomly assigned one vignette scenario with four possible conditions. After reading the hypothetical encounter, closed-ended survey items were administered to participants. Results: The standardized regression coefficients from the ordinal regression models revealed that participants who were administered the procedural injustice stimuli are less satisfied with how the police resolved the encounter, reported that they are less likely to follow the police directives, said they are less willing to accept the officer’s decisions, and are more likely to wish the police had handled the situation differently. This pattern of findings was consistent in both types of police encounters. Importantly, support was also found for the hypothesis that procedural injustice is more salient in predicting outcomes than whether a citation is issued. Conclusions: The results support the process-based model of regulation and serve to underscore the influence of unfair police processes on encounter-specific outcome variables.

AB - Objectives: This study tested the effect of procedural injustice relative to being sanctioned by police on a variety of outcome measures, such as decision acceptance and immediate compliance, in two types of police–citizen encounters, traffic stops and noise complaints. Methods: A factorial vignette design was used to determine the effect that the manipulations (i.e., procedural injustice and receiving a citation) had on the dependent variables. Participants (N = 594) were randomly assigned one vignette scenario with four possible conditions. After reading the hypothetical encounter, closed-ended survey items were administered to participants. Results: The standardized regression coefficients from the ordinal regression models revealed that participants who were administered the procedural injustice stimuli are less satisfied with how the police resolved the encounter, reported that they are less likely to follow the police directives, said they are less willing to accept the officer’s decisions, and are more likely to wish the police had handled the situation differently. This pattern of findings was consistent in both types of police encounters. Importantly, support was also found for the hypothesis that procedural injustice is more salient in predicting outcomes than whether a citation is issued. Conclusions: The results support the process-based model of regulation and serve to underscore the influence of unfair police processes on encounter-specific outcome variables.

KW - Compliance

KW - Police encounters

KW - Satisfaction with police

KW - Traffic stops

KW - Vignettes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030679863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030679863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11292-017-9307-1

DO - 10.1007/s11292-017-9307-1

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Experimental Criminology

JF - Journal of Experimental Criminology

SN - 1573-3750

ER -