The Effects of Memory Structure on Using Rule‐Based Expert Systems for Training: A Framework and an Empirical Test

Ker-Wei Pei, J. Hal Reneau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One justification for eliciting and representing the judgment strategy of an expert in a rule‐based expert system (RBES) is to facilitate knowledge transfer to individuals with less expertise. However, prior research suggests complexities and potential problems when using RBESs for training. In this paper, a conceptual framework of user learning from RBESs is presented. It is proposed that learning may be ineffective when the problem representation of the RBES is inconsistent with the user's mental representation of the task‐domain knowledge. An experiment was conducted to examine the effects of consistency (inconsistency) between the problem‐solving strategy of RBESs and individuals' memory structures. Groups of subjects whose memory structure either matched or did not match two RBESs' problem‐solving strategies were examined using an internal control evaluation task. The results suggest that learning was facilitated only for groups with congruence between the RBES's problem‐solving strategy and a subject's memory structure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-286
Number of pages24
JournalDecision Sciences
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Expert systems
Data storage equipment
Expert system
Empirical test
Experiments
Problem solving

Keywords

  • Auditing
  • Computer Applications
  • Decision Processes
  • Decision Support Systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

The Effects of Memory Structure on Using Rule‐Based Expert Systems for Training : A Framework and an Empirical Test. / Pei, Ker-Wei; Reneau, J. Hal.

In: Decision Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1990, p. 263-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a1c14ba063f4a7a9b31014ac5fd7526,
title = "The Effects of Memory Structure on Using Rule‐Based Expert Systems for Training: A Framework and an Empirical Test",
abstract = "One justification for eliciting and representing the judgment strategy of an expert in a rule‐based expert system (RBES) is to facilitate knowledge transfer to individuals with less expertise. However, prior research suggests complexities and potential problems when using RBESs for training. In this paper, a conceptual framework of user learning from RBESs is presented. It is proposed that learning may be ineffective when the problem representation of the RBES is inconsistent with the user's mental representation of the task‐domain knowledge. An experiment was conducted to examine the effects of consistency (inconsistency) between the problem‐solving strategy of RBESs and individuals' memory structures. Groups of subjects whose memory structure either matched or did not match two RBESs' problem‐solving strategies were examined using an internal control evaluation task. The results suggest that learning was facilitated only for groups with congruence between the RBES's problem‐solving strategy and a subject's memory structure.",
keywords = "Auditing, Computer Applications, Decision Processes, Decision Support Systems",
author = "Ker-Wei Pei and Reneau, {J. Hal}",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-5915.1990.tb01685.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "263--286",
journal = "Decision Sciences",
issn = "0011-7315",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Memory Structure on Using Rule‐Based Expert Systems for Training

T2 - A Framework and an Empirical Test

AU - Pei, Ker-Wei

AU - Reneau, J. Hal

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - One justification for eliciting and representing the judgment strategy of an expert in a rule‐based expert system (RBES) is to facilitate knowledge transfer to individuals with less expertise. However, prior research suggests complexities and potential problems when using RBESs for training. In this paper, a conceptual framework of user learning from RBESs is presented. It is proposed that learning may be ineffective when the problem representation of the RBES is inconsistent with the user's mental representation of the task‐domain knowledge. An experiment was conducted to examine the effects of consistency (inconsistency) between the problem‐solving strategy of RBESs and individuals' memory structures. Groups of subjects whose memory structure either matched or did not match two RBESs' problem‐solving strategies were examined using an internal control evaluation task. The results suggest that learning was facilitated only for groups with congruence between the RBES's problem‐solving strategy and a subject's memory structure.

AB - One justification for eliciting and representing the judgment strategy of an expert in a rule‐based expert system (RBES) is to facilitate knowledge transfer to individuals with less expertise. However, prior research suggests complexities and potential problems when using RBESs for training. In this paper, a conceptual framework of user learning from RBESs is presented. It is proposed that learning may be ineffective when the problem representation of the RBES is inconsistent with the user's mental representation of the task‐domain knowledge. An experiment was conducted to examine the effects of consistency (inconsistency) between the problem‐solving strategy of RBESs and individuals' memory structures. Groups of subjects whose memory structure either matched or did not match two RBESs' problem‐solving strategies were examined using an internal control evaluation task. The results suggest that learning was facilitated only for groups with congruence between the RBES's problem‐solving strategy and a subject's memory structure.

KW - Auditing

KW - Computer Applications

KW - Decision Processes

KW - Decision Support Systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985759065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84985759065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1990.tb01685.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1990.tb01685.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84985759065

VL - 21

SP - 263

EP - 286

JO - Decision Sciences

JF - Decision Sciences

SN - 0011-7315

IS - 2

ER -