The effect of underreporting response bias on the assessment of psychopathology

Richard I. Lanyon, Rebecca E. Wershba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent review offered the conclusion that the utility of considering response bias-in particular, underreporting, or defensiveness-in assessing psychopathology with structured inventories has not been demonstrated in practical criterion-related situations. The present research tested for the presence of suppressor and moderator effects in 3 such mental health classification tasks (disordered participants vs. control participants) using relevant predictors. Regression analyses showed the presence of one or both effects for all 3 tasks. The practical effects of these response biases were then illustrated by examining 4 measures of predictive accuracy at different levels of the response-bias measure: predictor/criterion correlations, hit rates, sensitivity/specificity, and positive/negative predictive power. It was concluded that there is clear utility in taking account of underreporting response bias in practical situations, particularly where extreme response bias is likely to be present. Confirmation of these findings with additional response-bias measures is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-338
Number of pages8
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Psychopathology
Mental Health
Regression Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Equipment and Supplies
Research

Keywords

  • Defensiveness
  • Psychopathology
  • Response bias
  • Underreporting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

The effect of underreporting response bias on the assessment of psychopathology. / Lanyon, Richard I.; Wershba, Rebecca E.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2013, p. 331-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lanyon, Richard I. ; Wershba, Rebecca E. / The effect of underreporting response bias on the assessment of psychopathology. In: Psychological Assessment. 2013 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 331-338.
@article{e967716c6db645de809b0533d75e4e06,
title = "The effect of underreporting response bias on the assessment of psychopathology",
abstract = "A recent review offered the conclusion that the utility of considering response bias-in particular, underreporting, or defensiveness-in assessing psychopathology with structured inventories has not been demonstrated in practical criterion-related situations. The present research tested for the presence of suppressor and moderator effects in 3 such mental health classification tasks (disordered participants vs. control participants) using relevant predictors. Regression analyses showed the presence of one or both effects for all 3 tasks. The practical effects of these response biases were then illustrated by examining 4 measures of predictive accuracy at different levels of the response-bias measure: predictor/criterion correlations, hit rates, sensitivity/specificity, and positive/negative predictive power. It was concluded that there is clear utility in taking account of underreporting response bias in practical situations, particularly where extreme response bias is likely to be present. Confirmation of these findings with additional response-bias measures is needed.",
keywords = "Defensiveness, Psychopathology, Response bias, Underreporting",
author = "Lanyon, {Richard I.} and Wershba, {Rebecca E.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1037/a0030914",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "331--338",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of underreporting response bias on the assessment of psychopathology

AU - Lanyon, Richard I.

AU - Wershba, Rebecca E.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - A recent review offered the conclusion that the utility of considering response bias-in particular, underreporting, or defensiveness-in assessing psychopathology with structured inventories has not been demonstrated in practical criterion-related situations. The present research tested for the presence of suppressor and moderator effects in 3 such mental health classification tasks (disordered participants vs. control participants) using relevant predictors. Regression analyses showed the presence of one or both effects for all 3 tasks. The practical effects of these response biases were then illustrated by examining 4 measures of predictive accuracy at different levels of the response-bias measure: predictor/criterion correlations, hit rates, sensitivity/specificity, and positive/negative predictive power. It was concluded that there is clear utility in taking account of underreporting response bias in practical situations, particularly where extreme response bias is likely to be present. Confirmation of these findings with additional response-bias measures is needed.

AB - A recent review offered the conclusion that the utility of considering response bias-in particular, underreporting, or defensiveness-in assessing psychopathology with structured inventories has not been demonstrated in practical criterion-related situations. The present research tested for the presence of suppressor and moderator effects in 3 such mental health classification tasks (disordered participants vs. control participants) using relevant predictors. Regression analyses showed the presence of one or both effects for all 3 tasks. The practical effects of these response biases were then illustrated by examining 4 measures of predictive accuracy at different levels of the response-bias measure: predictor/criterion correlations, hit rates, sensitivity/specificity, and positive/negative predictive power. It was concluded that there is clear utility in taking account of underreporting response bias in practical situations, particularly where extreme response bias is likely to be present. Confirmation of these findings with additional response-bias measures is needed.

KW - Defensiveness

KW - Psychopathology

KW - Response bias

KW - Underreporting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882568248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882568248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0030914

DO - 10.1037/a0030914

M3 - Article

C2 - 23244637

AN - SCOPUS:84882568248

VL - 25

SP - 331

EP - 338

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 2

ER -