The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures

David Rempel, Alan Barr, David Brafman, Ed Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that alternative geometry keyboards may prevent or reduce arm pain or disorders, and presumably the mechanism is by reducing awkward arm postures. However, the effect of alternative keyboards, especially the new designs, on wrist and arm postures are not well known. In this laboratory study, the wrist and forearm postures of 100 subjects were measured with a motion analysis system while they typed on 6 different keyboard configurations. There were significant differences in wrist extension, ulnar deviation, and forearm pronation between keyboards. When considering all 6 wrists and forearm postures together, the keyboard with an opening angle of 12°, a gable angle of 14°, and a slope of 0° appears to provide the most neutral posture among the keyboards tested. Subjects most preferred this keyboard or a similar keyboard with a gable angle of 8° and they least preferred the keyboard on a conventional laptop computer. These findings may assist in recommendations regarding the selection of keyboards for computer usage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-298
Number of pages6
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laptop computers
Wrist
Posture
Forearm
Geometry
systems analysis
Arm
pain
mathematics
Pronation
Somatoform Disorders
evidence
Motion analysis

Keywords

  • Design
  • Keyboard
  • Posture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cite this

The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures. / Rempel, David; Barr, Alan; Brafman, David; Young, Ed.

In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 38, No. 3, 05.2007, p. 293-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rempel, David ; Barr, Alan ; Brafman, David ; Young, Ed. / The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures. In: Applied Ergonomics. 2007 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 293-298.
@article{e667e5c7d0a54f8786f4ec17a138ef4b,
title = "The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures",
abstract = "There is increasing evidence that alternative geometry keyboards may prevent or reduce arm pain or disorders, and presumably the mechanism is by reducing awkward arm postures. However, the effect of alternative keyboards, especially the new designs, on wrist and arm postures are not well known. In this laboratory study, the wrist and forearm postures of 100 subjects were measured with a motion analysis system while they typed on 6 different keyboard configurations. There were significant differences in wrist extension, ulnar deviation, and forearm pronation between keyboards. When considering all 6 wrists and forearm postures together, the keyboard with an opening angle of 12°, a gable angle of 14°, and a slope of 0° appears to provide the most neutral posture among the keyboards tested. Subjects most preferred this keyboard or a similar keyboard with a gable angle of 8° and they least preferred the keyboard on a conventional laptop computer. These findings may assist in recommendations regarding the selection of keyboards for computer usage.",
keywords = "Design, Keyboard, Posture",
author = "David Rempel and Alan Barr and David Brafman and Ed Young",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2006.05.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "293--298",
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
issn = "0003-6870",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures

AU - Rempel, David

AU - Barr, Alan

AU - Brafman, David

AU - Young, Ed

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - There is increasing evidence that alternative geometry keyboards may prevent or reduce arm pain or disorders, and presumably the mechanism is by reducing awkward arm postures. However, the effect of alternative keyboards, especially the new designs, on wrist and arm postures are not well known. In this laboratory study, the wrist and forearm postures of 100 subjects were measured with a motion analysis system while they typed on 6 different keyboard configurations. There were significant differences in wrist extension, ulnar deviation, and forearm pronation between keyboards. When considering all 6 wrists and forearm postures together, the keyboard with an opening angle of 12°, a gable angle of 14°, and a slope of 0° appears to provide the most neutral posture among the keyboards tested. Subjects most preferred this keyboard or a similar keyboard with a gable angle of 8° and they least preferred the keyboard on a conventional laptop computer. These findings may assist in recommendations regarding the selection of keyboards for computer usage.

AB - There is increasing evidence that alternative geometry keyboards may prevent or reduce arm pain or disorders, and presumably the mechanism is by reducing awkward arm postures. However, the effect of alternative keyboards, especially the new designs, on wrist and arm postures are not well known. In this laboratory study, the wrist and forearm postures of 100 subjects were measured with a motion analysis system while they typed on 6 different keyboard configurations. There were significant differences in wrist extension, ulnar deviation, and forearm pronation between keyboards. When considering all 6 wrists and forearm postures together, the keyboard with an opening angle of 12°, a gable angle of 14°, and a slope of 0° appears to provide the most neutral posture among the keyboards tested. Subjects most preferred this keyboard or a similar keyboard with a gable angle of 8° and they least preferred the keyboard on a conventional laptop computer. These findings may assist in recommendations regarding the selection of keyboards for computer usage.

KW - Design

KW - Keyboard

KW - Posture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750964708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750964708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.05.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 16806042

AN - SCOPUS:33750964708

VL - 38

SP - 293

EP - 298

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

IS - 3

ER -