The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures

Alan Barr, David Rempel, Ed Young, David Brafman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that alternative geometry keyboards may prevent or reduce arm pain or disorders and presumably the mechanism is by reducing awkward arm postures. However, the effects of alternative keyboards, especially the new designs, on wrist and arm postures are not well known. In this laboratory study, the wrist and forearm postures of 100 subjects were measured with a motion analysis system while they typed on 6 different keyboard configurations. There were significant differences in wrist extension, ulnar deviation, and forearm pronation between keyboards. When considering all 6 wrist and forearm postures together, the keyboard with an opening angle of 12°, a gable angle of 14°, and a slope of 0° appears to provide the most neutral posture among the keyboards tested in the configuration tested. This study identifies significant wrist and forearm posture differences between 6 keyboard configurations. These findings may assist in ergonomie recommendations regarding computer usage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Pages1366-1369
Number of pages4
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes
Event50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2006 - San Francisco, CA, United States
Duration: Oct 16 2006Oct 20 2006

Other

Other50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2006
CountryUnited States
CitySan Francisco, CA
Period10/16/0610/20/06

Fingerprint

Geometry
Motion analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Barr, A., Rempel, D., Young, E., & Brafman, D. (2006). The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1366-1369)

The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures. / Barr, Alan; Rempel, David; Young, Ed; Brafman, David.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2006. p. 1366-1369.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Barr, A, Rempel, D, Young, E & Brafman, D 2006, The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures. in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. pp. 1366-1369, 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2006, San Francisco, CA, United States, 10/16/06.
Barr A, Rempel D, Young E, Brafman D. The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2006. p. 1366-1369
Barr, Alan ; Rempel, David ; Young, Ed ; Brafman, David. / The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2006. pp. 1366-1369
@inproceedings{e93e8b1d5a8e416aacea02e414b7f502,
title = "The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures",
abstract = "There is increasing evidence that alternative geometry keyboards may prevent or reduce arm pain or disorders and presumably the mechanism is by reducing awkward arm postures. However, the effects of alternative keyboards, especially the new designs, on wrist and arm postures are not well known. In this laboratory study, the wrist and forearm postures of 100 subjects were measured with a motion analysis system while they typed on 6 different keyboard configurations. There were significant differences in wrist extension, ulnar deviation, and forearm pronation between keyboards. When considering all 6 wrist and forearm postures together, the keyboard with an opening angle of 12°, a gable angle of 14°, and a slope of 0° appears to provide the most neutral posture among the keyboards tested in the configuration tested. This study identifies significant wrist and forearm posture differences between 6 keyboard configurations. These findings may assist in ergonomie recommendations regarding computer usage.",
author = "Alan Barr and David Rempel and Ed Young and David Brafman",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780945289296",
pages = "1366--1369",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures

AU - Barr, Alan

AU - Rempel, David

AU - Young, Ed

AU - Brafman, David

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - There is increasing evidence that alternative geometry keyboards may prevent or reduce arm pain or disorders and presumably the mechanism is by reducing awkward arm postures. However, the effects of alternative keyboards, especially the new designs, on wrist and arm postures are not well known. In this laboratory study, the wrist and forearm postures of 100 subjects were measured with a motion analysis system while they typed on 6 different keyboard configurations. There were significant differences in wrist extension, ulnar deviation, and forearm pronation between keyboards. When considering all 6 wrist and forearm postures together, the keyboard with an opening angle of 12°, a gable angle of 14°, and a slope of 0° appears to provide the most neutral posture among the keyboards tested in the configuration tested. This study identifies significant wrist and forearm posture differences between 6 keyboard configurations. These findings may assist in ergonomie recommendations regarding computer usage.

AB - There is increasing evidence that alternative geometry keyboards may prevent or reduce arm pain or disorders and presumably the mechanism is by reducing awkward arm postures. However, the effects of alternative keyboards, especially the new designs, on wrist and arm postures are not well known. In this laboratory study, the wrist and forearm postures of 100 subjects were measured with a motion analysis system while they typed on 6 different keyboard configurations. There were significant differences in wrist extension, ulnar deviation, and forearm pronation between keyboards. When considering all 6 wrist and forearm postures together, the keyboard with an opening angle of 12°, a gable angle of 14°, and a slope of 0° appears to provide the most neutral posture among the keyboards tested in the configuration tested. This study identifies significant wrist and forearm posture differences between 6 keyboard configurations. These findings may assist in ergonomie recommendations regarding computer usage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44349188462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44349188462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:44349188462

SN - 9780945289296

SP - 1366

EP - 1369

BT - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

ER -