The economic consequences of medical injuries

Implications for a no-fault insurance plan

William Johnson, T. A. Brennan, J. P. Newhouse, L. L. Leape, A. G. Lawthers, H. H. Hiatt, P. C. Weiler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. - There has been little research into the actual economic consequences of medical injuries. This inhibits informed discussion of alternatives to malpractice litigation. For example, the cost of no-fault medical accident insurance has been thought to be prohibitive. Method. - As part of a comprehensive analysis of medical injury and litigation, we interviewed a random sample of 794 individuals who had suffered medical adverse events in New York hospitals in 1984 and used their responses to calculate the cost of injuries. We then estimated the costs of a simulated no-fault insurance program that would operate as a second payer to direct insurance sources and would compensate for all financial losses attributed to medical injury. Results. - The estimated costs that would be paid by a simulated no-fault program were $161 million for medical care, $276 million for lost wages, and $441 million in lost household production, or a total of $878 million in 1989 dollars for the cohort of patients who were injured in 1984. Conclusion. - Although our estimate does not include administrative costs, it nonetheless indicates that a no-fault program would not be notably costlier than the more than $1 billion New York physicians now spend annually on malpractice insurance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2487-2492
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume267
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Liability Insurance
Medical Economics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Malpractice
Jurisprudence
Insurance
Accident Insurance
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Physicians
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Johnson, W., Brennan, T. A., Newhouse, J. P., Leape, L. L., Lawthers, A. G., Hiatt, H. H., & Weiler, P. C. (1992). The economic consequences of medical injuries: Implications for a no-fault insurance plan. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267(18), 2487-2492. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.267.18.2487

The economic consequences of medical injuries : Implications for a no-fault insurance plan. / Johnson, William; Brennan, T. A.; Newhouse, J. P.; Leape, L. L.; Lawthers, A. G.; Hiatt, H. H.; Weiler, P. C.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 267, No. 18, 1992, p. 2487-2492.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, W, Brennan, TA, Newhouse, JP, Leape, LL, Lawthers, AG, Hiatt, HH & Weiler, PC 1992, 'The economic consequences of medical injuries: Implications for a no-fault insurance plan', Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 267, no. 18, pp. 2487-2492. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.267.18.2487
Johnson, William ; Brennan, T. A. ; Newhouse, J. P. ; Leape, L. L. ; Lawthers, A. G. ; Hiatt, H. H. ; Weiler, P. C. / The economic consequences of medical injuries : Implications for a no-fault insurance plan. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992 ; Vol. 267, No. 18. pp. 2487-2492.
@article{b99bacc41c2e496ab278f2fc24c1861e,
title = "The economic consequences of medical injuries: Implications for a no-fault insurance plan",
abstract = "Background. - There has been little research into the actual economic consequences of medical injuries. This inhibits informed discussion of alternatives to malpractice litigation. For example, the cost of no-fault medical accident insurance has been thought to be prohibitive. Method. - As part of a comprehensive analysis of medical injury and litigation, we interviewed a random sample of 794 individuals who had suffered medical adverse events in New York hospitals in 1984 and used their responses to calculate the cost of injuries. We then estimated the costs of a simulated no-fault insurance program that would operate as a second payer to direct insurance sources and would compensate for all financial losses attributed to medical injury. Results. - The estimated costs that would be paid by a simulated no-fault program were $161 million for medical care, $276 million for lost wages, and $441 million in lost household production, or a total of $878 million in 1989 dollars for the cohort of patients who were injured in 1984. Conclusion. - Although our estimate does not include administrative costs, it nonetheless indicates that a no-fault program would not be notably costlier than the more than $1 billion New York physicians now spend annually on malpractice insurance.",
author = "William Johnson and Brennan, {T. A.} and Newhouse, {J. P.} and Leape, {L. L.} and Lawthers, {A. G.} and Hiatt, {H. H.} and Weiler, {P. C.}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1001/jama.267.18.2487",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "267",
pages = "2487--2492",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The economic consequences of medical injuries

T2 - Implications for a no-fault insurance plan

AU - Johnson, William

AU - Brennan, T. A.

AU - Newhouse, J. P.

AU - Leape, L. L.

AU - Lawthers, A. G.

AU - Hiatt, H. H.

AU - Weiler, P. C.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Background. - There has been little research into the actual economic consequences of medical injuries. This inhibits informed discussion of alternatives to malpractice litigation. For example, the cost of no-fault medical accident insurance has been thought to be prohibitive. Method. - As part of a comprehensive analysis of medical injury and litigation, we interviewed a random sample of 794 individuals who had suffered medical adverse events in New York hospitals in 1984 and used their responses to calculate the cost of injuries. We then estimated the costs of a simulated no-fault insurance program that would operate as a second payer to direct insurance sources and would compensate for all financial losses attributed to medical injury. Results. - The estimated costs that would be paid by a simulated no-fault program were $161 million for medical care, $276 million for lost wages, and $441 million in lost household production, or a total of $878 million in 1989 dollars for the cohort of patients who were injured in 1984. Conclusion. - Although our estimate does not include administrative costs, it nonetheless indicates that a no-fault program would not be notably costlier than the more than $1 billion New York physicians now spend annually on malpractice insurance.

AB - Background. - There has been little research into the actual economic consequences of medical injuries. This inhibits informed discussion of alternatives to malpractice litigation. For example, the cost of no-fault medical accident insurance has been thought to be prohibitive. Method. - As part of a comprehensive analysis of medical injury and litigation, we interviewed a random sample of 794 individuals who had suffered medical adverse events in New York hospitals in 1984 and used their responses to calculate the cost of injuries. We then estimated the costs of a simulated no-fault insurance program that would operate as a second payer to direct insurance sources and would compensate for all financial losses attributed to medical injury. Results. - The estimated costs that would be paid by a simulated no-fault program were $161 million for medical care, $276 million for lost wages, and $441 million in lost household production, or a total of $878 million in 1989 dollars for the cohort of patients who were injured in 1984. Conclusion. - Although our estimate does not include administrative costs, it nonetheless indicates that a no-fault program would not be notably costlier than the more than $1 billion New York physicians now spend annually on malpractice insurance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026507208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026507208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.267.18.2487

DO - 10.1001/jama.267.18.2487

M3 - Article

VL - 267

SP - 2487

EP - 2492

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 18

ER -