The distributional effects of a carbon tax on current and future generations

Stephanie Fried, Kevin Novan, William B. Peterman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper uses a life cycle model to compare how different approaches for recycling carbon tax revenue affect the welfare of agents born in the future steady state versus agents alive when the policy is adopted. Our results demonstrate that the welfare consequences of a given policy vary substantially across these two groups. For agents born into the future steady state, the expected non-environmental welfare costs are minimized when carbon tax revenue is used to reduce an existing distortionary tax. In contrast, among the agents alive when the policy is adopted, recycling revenue through uniform, lump-sum rebates results in the largest welfare increase across the policies we examine. Moreover, we find that the regressivity or progressivity of a policy also differs within the living population versus the future steady state population. Overall, our results illustrate that estimates of the non-environmental welfare costs of carbon tax policies that are based on the long-run outcomes miss-represent the near-term consequences. Given the potential importance of these near-term effects on the political feasibility of a policy, our findings indicate that, when designing a carbon tax, policy makers must pay careful attention to not only the long-run outcomes, but also to the transitional welfare effects of the policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-46
Number of pages17
JournalReview of Economic Dynamics
Volume30
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Distributional effects
Carbon tax
Tax revenues
Welfare cost
Tax policy
Distortionary taxes
Political feasibility
Progressivity
Life-cycle model
Welfare effects
Rebates
Revenue
Politicians

Keywords

  • Carbon taxation
  • Overlapping generations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

The distributional effects of a carbon tax on current and future generations. / Fried, Stephanie; Novan, Kevin; Peterman, William B.

In: Review of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 30, 01.10.2018, p. 30-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a91005d58774700bbc7f2941972187d,
title = "The distributional effects of a carbon tax on current and future generations",
abstract = "This paper uses a life cycle model to compare how different approaches for recycling carbon tax revenue affect the welfare of agents born in the future steady state versus agents alive when the policy is adopted. Our results demonstrate that the welfare consequences of a given policy vary substantially across these two groups. For agents born into the future steady state, the expected non-environmental welfare costs are minimized when carbon tax revenue is used to reduce an existing distortionary tax. In contrast, among the agents alive when the policy is adopted, recycling revenue through uniform, lump-sum rebates results in the largest welfare increase across the policies we examine. Moreover, we find that the regressivity or progressivity of a policy also differs within the living population versus the future steady state population. Overall, our results illustrate that estimates of the non-environmental welfare costs of carbon tax policies that are based on the long-run outcomes miss-represent the near-term consequences. Given the potential importance of these near-term effects on the political feasibility of a policy, our findings indicate that, when designing a carbon tax, policy makers must pay careful attention to not only the long-run outcomes, but also to the transitional welfare effects of the policy.",
keywords = "Carbon taxation, Overlapping generations",
author = "Stephanie Fried and Kevin Novan and Peterman, {William B.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.red.2018.02.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "30--46",
journal = "Review of Economic Dynamics",
issn = "1094-2025",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The distributional effects of a carbon tax on current and future generations

AU - Fried, Stephanie

AU - Novan, Kevin

AU - Peterman, William B.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - This paper uses a life cycle model to compare how different approaches for recycling carbon tax revenue affect the welfare of agents born in the future steady state versus agents alive when the policy is adopted. Our results demonstrate that the welfare consequences of a given policy vary substantially across these two groups. For agents born into the future steady state, the expected non-environmental welfare costs are minimized when carbon tax revenue is used to reduce an existing distortionary tax. In contrast, among the agents alive when the policy is adopted, recycling revenue through uniform, lump-sum rebates results in the largest welfare increase across the policies we examine. Moreover, we find that the regressivity or progressivity of a policy also differs within the living population versus the future steady state population. Overall, our results illustrate that estimates of the non-environmental welfare costs of carbon tax policies that are based on the long-run outcomes miss-represent the near-term consequences. Given the potential importance of these near-term effects on the political feasibility of a policy, our findings indicate that, when designing a carbon tax, policy makers must pay careful attention to not only the long-run outcomes, but also to the transitional welfare effects of the policy.

AB - This paper uses a life cycle model to compare how different approaches for recycling carbon tax revenue affect the welfare of agents born in the future steady state versus agents alive when the policy is adopted. Our results demonstrate that the welfare consequences of a given policy vary substantially across these two groups. For agents born into the future steady state, the expected non-environmental welfare costs are minimized when carbon tax revenue is used to reduce an existing distortionary tax. In contrast, among the agents alive when the policy is adopted, recycling revenue through uniform, lump-sum rebates results in the largest welfare increase across the policies we examine. Moreover, we find that the regressivity or progressivity of a policy also differs within the living population versus the future steady state population. Overall, our results illustrate that estimates of the non-environmental welfare costs of carbon tax policies that are based on the long-run outcomes miss-represent the near-term consequences. Given the potential importance of these near-term effects on the political feasibility of a policy, our findings indicate that, when designing a carbon tax, policy makers must pay careful attention to not only the long-run outcomes, but also to the transitional welfare effects of the policy.

KW - Carbon taxation

KW - Overlapping generations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042467327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042467327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.red.2018.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.red.2018.02.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042467327

VL - 30

SP - 30

EP - 46

JO - Review of Economic Dynamics

JF - Review of Economic Dynamics

SN - 1094-2025

ER -