THE DISRUPTION COSTS OF POST–9–11 SECURITY MEASURES AND CITIES’ BIDS FOR PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATING CONVENTIONS

Eric S. Heberlig, Suzanne M. Leland, Mark Shields, David Swindell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over the past several decades, cities have increasingly built facilities and amenities to attract tourism, conventions, and mega-events. Mega-events bring cities tourism revenues and free media attention to brand themselves. We theorize regarding why cities seek to host presidential nominating conventions and why the increased disruption costs of the post–9–11 security environment have changed the way cities evaluate the branding opportunities of mega-events. Consistent with our predictions, larger and more tourism-dependent cities are less likely to need the branding opportunities of political conventions than their competitors and therefore are less willing to incur the disruption costs of political conventions after 9–11.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)370-386
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Urban Affairs
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'THE DISRUPTION COSTS OF POST–9–11 SECURITY MEASURES AND CITIES’ BIDS FOR PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATING CONVENTIONS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this