The devil is in the details: New directions in deception analysis

Philip M. McCarthy, Nicholas Duran, Lucille M. Booker

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we use the computational textual analysis tool, the Gramulator, to identify and examine the distinctive linguistic features of deceptive and truthful discourse. The theme of the study is abortion rights and the deceptive texts are derived from a Devil's Advocate approach, conducted to suppress personal beliefs and values. Our study takes the form of a contrastive corpus analysis, and produces systematic differences between truthful and deceptive personal accounts. Results suggest that deceivers employ a distancing strategy that is often associated with deceptive linguistic behavior. Ultimately, these deceivers struggle to adopt a truth perspective. Perhaps of most importance, our results indicate issues of concern with current deception detection theory and methodology. From a theoretical standpoint, our results question whether deceivers are deceiving at all or whether they are merely poorly expressing a rhetorical position, caused by being forced to speculate on a perceived proto-typical position. From a methodological standpoint, our results cause us to question the validity of deception corpora. Consequently, we propose new rigorous standards so as to better understand the subject matter of the deception field. Finally, we question the prevailing approach of abstract data measurement and call for future assessment to consider contextual lexical features. We conclude by suggesting a prudent approach to future research for fear that our eagerness to analyze and theorize may cause us to misidentify deception. After-all, successful deception, which is the kind we seek to detect, is likely to be an elusive and fickle prey.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25
Pages188-195
Number of pages8
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes
Event25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25 - Marco Island, FL, United States
Duration: May 23 2012May 25 2012

Other

Other25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25
CountryUnited States
CityMarco Island, FL
Period5/23/125/25/12

Fingerprint

Linguistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

McCarthy, P. M., Duran, N., & Booker, L. M. (2012). The devil is in the details: New directions in deception analysis. In Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25 (pp. 188-195)

The devil is in the details : New directions in deception analysis. / McCarthy, Philip M.; Duran, Nicholas; Booker, Lucille M.

Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25. 2012. p. 188-195.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

McCarthy, PM, Duran, N & Booker, LM 2012, The devil is in the details: New directions in deception analysis. in Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25. pp. 188-195, 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25, Marco Island, FL, United States, 5/23/12.
McCarthy PM, Duran N, Booker LM. The devil is in the details: New directions in deception analysis. In Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25. 2012. p. 188-195
McCarthy, Philip M. ; Duran, Nicholas ; Booker, Lucille M. / The devil is in the details : New directions in deception analysis. Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25. 2012. pp. 188-195
@inproceedings{2a4815248df046ef8cf6e80529078ef7,
title = "The devil is in the details: New directions in deception analysis",
abstract = "In this study, we use the computational textual analysis tool, the Gramulator, to identify and examine the distinctive linguistic features of deceptive and truthful discourse. The theme of the study is abortion rights and the deceptive texts are derived from a Devil's Advocate approach, conducted to suppress personal beliefs and values. Our study takes the form of a contrastive corpus analysis, and produces systematic differences between truthful and deceptive personal accounts. Results suggest that deceivers employ a distancing strategy that is often associated with deceptive linguistic behavior. Ultimately, these deceivers struggle to adopt a truth perspective. Perhaps of most importance, our results indicate issues of concern with current deception detection theory and methodology. From a theoretical standpoint, our results question whether deceivers are deceiving at all or whether they are merely poorly expressing a rhetorical position, caused by being forced to speculate on a perceived proto-typical position. From a methodological standpoint, our results cause us to question the validity of deception corpora. Consequently, we propose new rigorous standards so as to better understand the subject matter of the deception field. Finally, we question the prevailing approach of abstract data measurement and call for future assessment to consider contextual lexical features. We conclude by suggesting a prudent approach to future research for fear that our eagerness to analyze and theorize may cause us to misidentify deception. After-all, successful deception, which is the kind we seek to detect, is likely to be an elusive and fickle prey.",
author = "McCarthy, {Philip M.} and Nicholas Duran and Booker, {Lucille M.}",
year = "2012",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781577355588",
pages = "188--195",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The devil is in the details

T2 - New directions in deception analysis

AU - McCarthy, Philip M.

AU - Duran, Nicholas

AU - Booker, Lucille M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In this study, we use the computational textual analysis tool, the Gramulator, to identify and examine the distinctive linguistic features of deceptive and truthful discourse. The theme of the study is abortion rights and the deceptive texts are derived from a Devil's Advocate approach, conducted to suppress personal beliefs and values. Our study takes the form of a contrastive corpus analysis, and produces systematic differences between truthful and deceptive personal accounts. Results suggest that deceivers employ a distancing strategy that is often associated with deceptive linguistic behavior. Ultimately, these deceivers struggle to adopt a truth perspective. Perhaps of most importance, our results indicate issues of concern with current deception detection theory and methodology. From a theoretical standpoint, our results question whether deceivers are deceiving at all or whether they are merely poorly expressing a rhetorical position, caused by being forced to speculate on a perceived proto-typical position. From a methodological standpoint, our results cause us to question the validity of deception corpora. Consequently, we propose new rigorous standards so as to better understand the subject matter of the deception field. Finally, we question the prevailing approach of abstract data measurement and call for future assessment to consider contextual lexical features. We conclude by suggesting a prudent approach to future research for fear that our eagerness to analyze and theorize may cause us to misidentify deception. After-all, successful deception, which is the kind we seek to detect, is likely to be an elusive and fickle prey.

AB - In this study, we use the computational textual analysis tool, the Gramulator, to identify and examine the distinctive linguistic features of deceptive and truthful discourse. The theme of the study is abortion rights and the deceptive texts are derived from a Devil's Advocate approach, conducted to suppress personal beliefs and values. Our study takes the form of a contrastive corpus analysis, and produces systematic differences between truthful and deceptive personal accounts. Results suggest that deceivers employ a distancing strategy that is often associated with deceptive linguistic behavior. Ultimately, these deceivers struggle to adopt a truth perspective. Perhaps of most importance, our results indicate issues of concern with current deception detection theory and methodology. From a theoretical standpoint, our results question whether deceivers are deceiving at all or whether they are merely poorly expressing a rhetorical position, caused by being forced to speculate on a perceived proto-typical position. From a methodological standpoint, our results cause us to question the validity of deception corpora. Consequently, we propose new rigorous standards so as to better understand the subject matter of the deception field. Finally, we question the prevailing approach of abstract data measurement and call for future assessment to consider contextual lexical features. We conclude by suggesting a prudent approach to future research for fear that our eagerness to analyze and theorize may cause us to misidentify deception. After-all, successful deception, which is the kind we seek to detect, is likely to be an elusive and fickle prey.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865025073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865025073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84865025073

SN - 9781577355588

SP - 188

EP - 195

BT - Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25

ER -