The development, application, and refinement of a Regenerative Development Evaluation Tool and indicators

Leah V. Gibbons, Genevieve Pearthree, Scott Cloutier, Meagan Ehlenz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ecological indicators are foundational for holistic guidance toward thriving living systems, yet existing indicators are incomplete, fragmented, and do not fully integrate living systems principles. We suggest that thriving living systems (i.e., social-ecological or complex adaptive systems) can and should be the aim of sustainability and sustainable development. Thriving living systems, also called regenerative living systems, are those in which complexity, diversity, capacity to support all life, and the potential to change to provide future options increases. Holistic ecological and sustainability indicators and evaluation tools are needed. The emerging field of regenerative development (RD) offers theoretical and practical guidance for such indicators and tools. We integrate complex adaptive systems science, ecology, sustainability, and regenerative development to construct and pilot the first iteration of a holistic sustainable development evaluation tool—the Regenerative Development Evaluation Tool—in two river restoration projects. The tool identifies RD Principles and Core Characteristics of Regenerative Living Systems that provide general guidance for thinking and decision-making. From these general indicators, place-based quantitative and qualitative indicators are constructed through a co-creative community process. Our case studies reveal factors correlated with degrees of engagement with RD and potential place-based indicators for each project. We recommend continuing the development and expansion of the RD Evaluation Tool, adding RD indicators and strategies. We also recommend developing an RD process tool that can work explicitly across scales, integrating the neighborhood, city, landscape, and regional scales since they are pivotal for sustainability efforts and manifesting thriving living systems. Finally, we recommended integrated research and practice to test and adapt RD tools and processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number105698
JournalEcological Indicators
Volume108
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Fingerprint

sustainable development
sustainability
decision making
case studies
ecology
rivers
development indicator
testing
development strategy
indicator
evaluation
Evaluation
Living systems
river

Keywords

  • Complex adaptive systems
  • Holistic development
  • Holistic indicators
  • Regenerative development
  • Social-ecological systems
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

The development, application, and refinement of a Regenerative Development Evaluation Tool and indicators. / Gibbons, Leah V.; Pearthree, Genevieve; Cloutier, Scott; Ehlenz, Meagan.

In: Ecological Indicators, Vol. 108, 105698, 01.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de5385f205974e13829b1ccc4e8cb19a,
title = "The development, application, and refinement of a Regenerative Development Evaluation Tool and indicators",
abstract = "Ecological indicators are foundational for holistic guidance toward thriving living systems, yet existing indicators are incomplete, fragmented, and do not fully integrate living systems principles. We suggest that thriving living systems (i.e., social-ecological or complex adaptive systems) can and should be the aim of sustainability and sustainable development. Thriving living systems, also called regenerative living systems, are those in which complexity, diversity, capacity to support all life, and the potential to change to provide future options increases. Holistic ecological and sustainability indicators and evaluation tools are needed. The emerging field of regenerative development (RD) offers theoretical and practical guidance for such indicators and tools. We integrate complex adaptive systems science, ecology, sustainability, and regenerative development to construct and pilot the first iteration of a holistic sustainable development evaluation tool—the Regenerative Development Evaluation Tool—in two river restoration projects. The tool identifies RD Principles and Core Characteristics of Regenerative Living Systems that provide general guidance for thinking and decision-making. From these general indicators, place-based quantitative and qualitative indicators are constructed through a co-creative community process. Our case studies reveal factors correlated with degrees of engagement with RD and potential place-based indicators for each project. We recommend continuing the development and expansion of the RD Evaluation Tool, adding RD indicators and strategies. We also recommend developing an RD process tool that can work explicitly across scales, integrating the neighborhood, city, landscape, and regional scales since they are pivotal for sustainability efforts and manifesting thriving living systems. Finally, we recommended integrated research and practice to test and adapt RD tools and processes.",
keywords = "Complex adaptive systems, Holistic development, Holistic indicators, Regenerative development, Social-ecological systems, Sustainability",
author = "Gibbons, {Leah V.} and Genevieve Pearthree and Scott Cloutier and Meagan Ehlenz",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105698",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development, application, and refinement of a Regenerative Development Evaluation Tool and indicators

AU - Gibbons, Leah V.

AU - Pearthree, Genevieve

AU - Cloutier, Scott

AU - Ehlenz, Meagan

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Ecological indicators are foundational for holistic guidance toward thriving living systems, yet existing indicators are incomplete, fragmented, and do not fully integrate living systems principles. We suggest that thriving living systems (i.e., social-ecological or complex adaptive systems) can and should be the aim of sustainability and sustainable development. Thriving living systems, also called regenerative living systems, are those in which complexity, diversity, capacity to support all life, and the potential to change to provide future options increases. Holistic ecological and sustainability indicators and evaluation tools are needed. The emerging field of regenerative development (RD) offers theoretical and practical guidance for such indicators and tools. We integrate complex adaptive systems science, ecology, sustainability, and regenerative development to construct and pilot the first iteration of a holistic sustainable development evaluation tool—the Regenerative Development Evaluation Tool—in two river restoration projects. The tool identifies RD Principles and Core Characteristics of Regenerative Living Systems that provide general guidance for thinking and decision-making. From these general indicators, place-based quantitative and qualitative indicators are constructed through a co-creative community process. Our case studies reveal factors correlated with degrees of engagement with RD and potential place-based indicators for each project. We recommend continuing the development and expansion of the RD Evaluation Tool, adding RD indicators and strategies. We also recommend developing an RD process tool that can work explicitly across scales, integrating the neighborhood, city, landscape, and regional scales since they are pivotal for sustainability efforts and manifesting thriving living systems. Finally, we recommended integrated research and practice to test and adapt RD tools and processes.

AB - Ecological indicators are foundational for holistic guidance toward thriving living systems, yet existing indicators are incomplete, fragmented, and do not fully integrate living systems principles. We suggest that thriving living systems (i.e., social-ecological or complex adaptive systems) can and should be the aim of sustainability and sustainable development. Thriving living systems, also called regenerative living systems, are those in which complexity, diversity, capacity to support all life, and the potential to change to provide future options increases. Holistic ecological and sustainability indicators and evaluation tools are needed. The emerging field of regenerative development (RD) offers theoretical and practical guidance for such indicators and tools. We integrate complex adaptive systems science, ecology, sustainability, and regenerative development to construct and pilot the first iteration of a holistic sustainable development evaluation tool—the Regenerative Development Evaluation Tool—in two river restoration projects. The tool identifies RD Principles and Core Characteristics of Regenerative Living Systems that provide general guidance for thinking and decision-making. From these general indicators, place-based quantitative and qualitative indicators are constructed through a co-creative community process. Our case studies reveal factors correlated with degrees of engagement with RD and potential place-based indicators for each project. We recommend continuing the development and expansion of the RD Evaluation Tool, adding RD indicators and strategies. We also recommend developing an RD process tool that can work explicitly across scales, integrating the neighborhood, city, landscape, and regional scales since they are pivotal for sustainability efforts and manifesting thriving living systems. Finally, we recommended integrated research and practice to test and adapt RD tools and processes.

KW - Complex adaptive systems

KW - Holistic development

KW - Holistic indicators

KW - Regenerative development

KW - Social-ecological systems

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072213080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072213080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105698

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105698

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072213080

VL - 108

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

M1 - 105698

ER -