The development and preliminary validation of the Profile of Chronic Pain: Extended Assessment Battery

Linda S. Ruehlman, Paul Karoly, Craig Newton, Leona S. Aiken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the present research was the development and validation of a set of instruments, collectively called the Profile of Chronic Pain: Extended Assessment Battery (PCP:EA), designed to be administered to adults (between the ages of 25 to 80) after establishing the existence of a chronic pain problem. The final 86-item version of the PCP:EA consisted of 33 single items assessing: pain location and severity, pain characteristics (e.g. worst daily pain), medication use, health care status, the identity of the most important person in the patient's life, and functional limitations in 10 areas of daily living. In addition, the PCP:EA includes 13 multi-item subscales addressing aspects of coping (guarding, ignoring, task persistence, and positive self-talk), catastrophizing, pain attitudes and beliefs (including disability beliefs, belief in a medical cure for pain, belief in pain control, and pain-induced fear), and positive (tangible and emotional) and negative (insensitivity and impatience) social responses. Data were obtained from two national samples which were recruited and screened via a random-digit dialing telephone interview procedure. Stratified sampling was employed to assure equal gender and age group representation across three age groupings (25-44; 45-64; 65-80). Two survey studies provided strong evidence for the hypothesized factor structure, internal consistency, independence from response bias, and validity of the PCP:EA. Moreover, the presence of normative data enhance the diagnostic and prescriptive utility of the instrument.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)380-389
Number of pages10
JournalPain
Volume118
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 5 2005

Fingerprint

Pain Measurement
Chronic Pain
Pain
Catastrophization
Health Status
Fear
Age Groups
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care
Research

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Pain assessment
  • Pain attitudes and beliefs
  • Pain coping
  • Social responses to pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

The development and preliminary validation of the Profile of Chronic Pain : Extended Assessment Battery. / Ruehlman, Linda S.; Karoly, Paul; Newton, Craig; Aiken, Leona S.

In: Pain, Vol. 118, No. 3, 05.12.2005, p. 380-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ruehlman, Linda S. ; Karoly, Paul ; Newton, Craig ; Aiken, Leona S. / The development and preliminary validation of the Profile of Chronic Pain : Extended Assessment Battery. In: Pain. 2005 ; Vol. 118, No. 3. pp. 380-389.
@article{edac00c1f048417b9d968881e4d588df,
title = "The development and preliminary validation of the Profile of Chronic Pain: Extended Assessment Battery",
abstract = "The aim of the present research was the development and validation of a set of instruments, collectively called the Profile of Chronic Pain: Extended Assessment Battery (PCP:EA), designed to be administered to adults (between the ages of 25 to 80) after establishing the existence of a chronic pain problem. The final 86-item version of the PCP:EA consisted of 33 single items assessing: pain location and severity, pain characteristics (e.g. worst daily pain), medication use, health care status, the identity of the most important person in the patient's life, and functional limitations in 10 areas of daily living. In addition, the PCP:EA includes 13 multi-item subscales addressing aspects of coping (guarding, ignoring, task persistence, and positive self-talk), catastrophizing, pain attitudes and beliefs (including disability beliefs, belief in a medical cure for pain, belief in pain control, and pain-induced fear), and positive (tangible and emotional) and negative (insensitivity and impatience) social responses. Data were obtained from two national samples which were recruited and screened via a random-digit dialing telephone interview procedure. Stratified sampling was employed to assure equal gender and age group representation across three age groupings (25-44; 45-64; 65-80). Two survey studies provided strong evidence for the hypothesized factor structure, internal consistency, independence from response bias, and validity of the PCP:EA. Moreover, the presence of normative data enhance the diagnostic and prescriptive utility of the instrument.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, Pain assessment, Pain attitudes and beliefs, Pain coping, Social responses to pain",
author = "Ruehlman, {Linda S.} and Paul Karoly and Craig Newton and Aiken, {Leona S.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "380--389",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development and preliminary validation of the Profile of Chronic Pain

T2 - Extended Assessment Battery

AU - Ruehlman, Linda S.

AU - Karoly, Paul

AU - Newton, Craig

AU - Aiken, Leona S.

PY - 2005/12/5

Y1 - 2005/12/5

N2 - The aim of the present research was the development and validation of a set of instruments, collectively called the Profile of Chronic Pain: Extended Assessment Battery (PCP:EA), designed to be administered to adults (between the ages of 25 to 80) after establishing the existence of a chronic pain problem. The final 86-item version of the PCP:EA consisted of 33 single items assessing: pain location and severity, pain characteristics (e.g. worst daily pain), medication use, health care status, the identity of the most important person in the patient's life, and functional limitations in 10 areas of daily living. In addition, the PCP:EA includes 13 multi-item subscales addressing aspects of coping (guarding, ignoring, task persistence, and positive self-talk), catastrophizing, pain attitudes and beliefs (including disability beliefs, belief in a medical cure for pain, belief in pain control, and pain-induced fear), and positive (tangible and emotional) and negative (insensitivity and impatience) social responses. Data were obtained from two national samples which were recruited and screened via a random-digit dialing telephone interview procedure. Stratified sampling was employed to assure equal gender and age group representation across three age groupings (25-44; 45-64; 65-80). Two survey studies provided strong evidence for the hypothesized factor structure, internal consistency, independence from response bias, and validity of the PCP:EA. Moreover, the presence of normative data enhance the diagnostic and prescriptive utility of the instrument.

AB - The aim of the present research was the development and validation of a set of instruments, collectively called the Profile of Chronic Pain: Extended Assessment Battery (PCP:EA), designed to be administered to adults (between the ages of 25 to 80) after establishing the existence of a chronic pain problem. The final 86-item version of the PCP:EA consisted of 33 single items assessing: pain location and severity, pain characteristics (e.g. worst daily pain), medication use, health care status, the identity of the most important person in the patient's life, and functional limitations in 10 areas of daily living. In addition, the PCP:EA includes 13 multi-item subscales addressing aspects of coping (guarding, ignoring, task persistence, and positive self-talk), catastrophizing, pain attitudes and beliefs (including disability beliefs, belief in a medical cure for pain, belief in pain control, and pain-induced fear), and positive (tangible and emotional) and negative (insensitivity and impatience) social responses. Data were obtained from two national samples which were recruited and screened via a random-digit dialing telephone interview procedure. Stratified sampling was employed to assure equal gender and age group representation across three age groupings (25-44; 45-64; 65-80). Two survey studies provided strong evidence for the hypothesized factor structure, internal consistency, independence from response bias, and validity of the PCP:EA. Moreover, the presence of normative data enhance the diagnostic and prescriptive utility of the instrument.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Pain assessment

KW - Pain attitudes and beliefs

KW - Pain coping

KW - Social responses to pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28644432878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28644432878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 16289796

AN - SCOPUS:28644432878

VL - 118

SP - 380

EP - 389

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 3

ER -