The Development and Construct Validity of a Team Processes Survey Measure

John E. Mathieu, Margaret Luciano, Lauren D’Innocenzo, Elizabeth A. Klock, Jeffery LePine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Marks, Mathieu, and Zaccaro (2001) advanced a theory and framework of team processes that has garnered much attention and guided numerous investigations. They proposed that 10 first-order constructs (e.g., strategy formulation, coordination, conflict management) would map to three second-order constructs (i.e., transition, action, and interpersonal). Despite the popularity of this framework, we are unaware of any validated multiitem measures of the team processes they identified. Accordingly, we develop and demonstrate content and construct validity of 50-, 30-, and 10-item versions of a survey measure of team processes. Using data from over 700 teams, we test Marks et al.’s higher-order model and find results that are largely consistent with both their 10 first-order dimensions and the 10:3 second-order framework. Using samples of global virtual knowledge teams and health care employees, we provide evidence of the discriminant validity of our team process measure versus a measure of team empowerment. We provide recommendations for the use of these measures in future research and practice and encourage their use as part of a portfolio of measures of team processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOrganizational Research Methods
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Health care
Personnel
Power (Psychology)
Construct validity

Keywords

  • construct validity
  • scale development
  • team process

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

The Development and Construct Validity of a Team Processes Survey Measure. / Mathieu, John E.; Luciano, Margaret; D’Innocenzo, Lauren; Klock, Elizabeth A.; LePine, Jeffery.

In: Organizational Research Methods, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a22cc3e3c6004f879e82cba824a019f6,
title = "The Development and Construct Validity of a Team Processes Survey Measure",
abstract = "Marks, Mathieu, and Zaccaro (2001) advanced a theory and framework of team processes that has garnered much attention and guided numerous investigations. They proposed that 10 first-order constructs (e.g., strategy formulation, coordination, conflict management) would map to three second-order constructs (i.e., transition, action, and interpersonal). Despite the popularity of this framework, we are unaware of any validated multiitem measures of the team processes they identified. Accordingly, we develop and demonstrate content and construct validity of 50-, 30-, and 10-item versions of a survey measure of team processes. Using data from over 700 teams, we test Marks et al.’s higher-order model and find results that are largely consistent with both their 10 first-order dimensions and the 10:3 second-order framework. Using samples of global virtual knowledge teams and health care employees, we provide evidence of the discriminant validity of our team process measure versus a measure of team empowerment. We provide recommendations for the use of these measures in future research and practice and encourage their use as part of a portfolio of measures of team processes.",
keywords = "construct validity, scale development, team process",
author = "Mathieu, {John E.} and Margaret Luciano and Lauren D’Innocenzo and Klock, {Elizabeth A.} and Jeffery LePine",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1094428119840801",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Organizational Research Methods",
issn = "1094-4281",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Development and Construct Validity of a Team Processes Survey Measure

AU - Mathieu, John E.

AU - Luciano, Margaret

AU - D’Innocenzo, Lauren

AU - Klock, Elizabeth A.

AU - LePine, Jeffery

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Marks, Mathieu, and Zaccaro (2001) advanced a theory and framework of team processes that has garnered much attention and guided numerous investigations. They proposed that 10 first-order constructs (e.g., strategy formulation, coordination, conflict management) would map to three second-order constructs (i.e., transition, action, and interpersonal). Despite the popularity of this framework, we are unaware of any validated multiitem measures of the team processes they identified. Accordingly, we develop and demonstrate content and construct validity of 50-, 30-, and 10-item versions of a survey measure of team processes. Using data from over 700 teams, we test Marks et al.’s higher-order model and find results that are largely consistent with both their 10 first-order dimensions and the 10:3 second-order framework. Using samples of global virtual knowledge teams and health care employees, we provide evidence of the discriminant validity of our team process measure versus a measure of team empowerment. We provide recommendations for the use of these measures in future research and practice and encourage their use as part of a portfolio of measures of team processes.

AB - Marks, Mathieu, and Zaccaro (2001) advanced a theory and framework of team processes that has garnered much attention and guided numerous investigations. They proposed that 10 first-order constructs (e.g., strategy formulation, coordination, conflict management) would map to three second-order constructs (i.e., transition, action, and interpersonal). Despite the popularity of this framework, we are unaware of any validated multiitem measures of the team processes they identified. Accordingly, we develop and demonstrate content and construct validity of 50-, 30-, and 10-item versions of a survey measure of team processes. Using data from over 700 teams, we test Marks et al.’s higher-order model and find results that are largely consistent with both their 10 first-order dimensions and the 10:3 second-order framework. Using samples of global virtual knowledge teams and health care employees, we provide evidence of the discriminant validity of our team process measure versus a measure of team empowerment. We provide recommendations for the use of these measures in future research and practice and encourage their use as part of a portfolio of measures of team processes.

KW - construct validity

KW - scale development

KW - team process

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065170384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065170384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1094428119840801

DO - 10.1177/1094428119840801

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065170384

JO - Organizational Research Methods

JF - Organizational Research Methods

SN - 1094-4281

ER -