The Decision-Making/Accountability Spatial Incongruence Problem for Research Linking Environmental Science and Policy

Patricia Solís, Jennifer K. Vanos, Robert E. Forbis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increasingly, scholars engage policy makers around fundamental, complex questions on environmental change in interdisciplinary settings. Researchers attempting to develop robust contributions to knowledge that can support policymaker understandings in this context face significant inferential challenges in dealing with the spatial dimension of their phenomenon of interest. In this paper, we extend an understanding of well-defined methodological challenges familiar to applied spatial scientists by explicitly articulating the Decision-Making/Accountability, Spatial Incongruence Problem, or DASIP. Three case studies illustrate how spatial incongruences matter to researchers who work on complex, interdisciplinary problems, while seeking to understand decision-making or policy-related phenomenon: urban heat-island mitigation research in Arizona, water transfer conflicts in Kansas, and hydraulic-fracturing debates in Texas. With such examples, we aim to evoke a deeper understanding of this problem in applied research and also inspire thinking about how scholars might innovate methods for creating knowledge about environmental change that supports spatially accountable decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)680-704
Number of pages25
JournalGeographical Review
Volume107
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

environmental research
accountability
environmental policy
decision making
responsibility
environmental change
science
heat island
heat
mitigation
water
environmental science
policy

Keywords

  • accountability
  • decision making
  • geographic methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

The Decision-Making/Accountability Spatial Incongruence Problem for Research Linking Environmental Science and Policy. / Solís, Patricia; Vanos, Jennifer K.; Forbis, Robert E.

In: Geographical Review, Vol. 107, No. 4, 10.2017, p. 680-704.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6ee4562196d248bb89d060e68bce9173,
title = "The Decision-Making/Accountability Spatial Incongruence Problem for Research Linking Environmental Science and Policy",
abstract = "Increasingly, scholars engage policy makers around fundamental, complex questions on environmental change in interdisciplinary settings. Researchers attempting to develop robust contributions to knowledge that can support policymaker understandings in this context face significant inferential challenges in dealing with the spatial dimension of their phenomenon of interest. In this paper, we extend an understanding of well-defined methodological challenges familiar to applied spatial scientists by explicitly articulating the Decision-Making/Accountability, Spatial Incongruence Problem, or DASIP. Three case studies illustrate how spatial incongruences matter to researchers who work on complex, interdisciplinary problems, while seeking to understand decision-making or policy-related phenomenon: urban heat-island mitigation research in Arizona, water transfer conflicts in Kansas, and hydraulic-fracturing debates in Texas. With such examples, we aim to evoke a deeper understanding of this problem in applied research and also inspire thinking about how scholars might innovate methods for creating knowledge about environmental change that supports spatially accountable decision making.",
keywords = "accountability, decision making, geographic methods",
author = "Patricia Sol{\'i}s and Vanos, {Jennifer K.} and Forbis, {Robert E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/gere.12240",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "680--704",
journal = "Geographical Review",
issn = "0016-7428",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Decision-Making/Accountability Spatial Incongruence Problem for Research Linking Environmental Science and Policy

AU - Solís, Patricia

AU - Vanos, Jennifer K.

AU - Forbis, Robert E.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Increasingly, scholars engage policy makers around fundamental, complex questions on environmental change in interdisciplinary settings. Researchers attempting to develop robust contributions to knowledge that can support policymaker understandings in this context face significant inferential challenges in dealing with the spatial dimension of their phenomenon of interest. In this paper, we extend an understanding of well-defined methodological challenges familiar to applied spatial scientists by explicitly articulating the Decision-Making/Accountability, Spatial Incongruence Problem, or DASIP. Three case studies illustrate how spatial incongruences matter to researchers who work on complex, interdisciplinary problems, while seeking to understand decision-making or policy-related phenomenon: urban heat-island mitigation research in Arizona, water transfer conflicts in Kansas, and hydraulic-fracturing debates in Texas. With such examples, we aim to evoke a deeper understanding of this problem in applied research and also inspire thinking about how scholars might innovate methods for creating knowledge about environmental change that supports spatially accountable decision making.

AB - Increasingly, scholars engage policy makers around fundamental, complex questions on environmental change in interdisciplinary settings. Researchers attempting to develop robust contributions to knowledge that can support policymaker understandings in this context face significant inferential challenges in dealing with the spatial dimension of their phenomenon of interest. In this paper, we extend an understanding of well-defined methodological challenges familiar to applied spatial scientists by explicitly articulating the Decision-Making/Accountability, Spatial Incongruence Problem, or DASIP. Three case studies illustrate how spatial incongruences matter to researchers who work on complex, interdisciplinary problems, while seeking to understand decision-making or policy-related phenomenon: urban heat-island mitigation research in Arizona, water transfer conflicts in Kansas, and hydraulic-fracturing debates in Texas. With such examples, we aim to evoke a deeper understanding of this problem in applied research and also inspire thinking about how scholars might innovate methods for creating knowledge about environmental change that supports spatially accountable decision making.

KW - accountability

KW - decision making

KW - geographic methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006985873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006985873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gere.12240

DO - 10.1111/gere.12240

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85006985873

VL - 107

SP - 680

EP - 704

JO - Geographical Review

JF - Geographical Review

SN - 0016-7428

IS - 4

ER -