The current status and future direction of nanotechnology regulations: A view from nano-scientists

Elizabeth Corley, Youngjae Kim, Dietram A. Scheufele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents an up-to-date view of leading U.S. nanoscientists' perceptions about the regulation of nanotechnology. Our analysis draws from the results of a 2011 mail survey with 444 of the most prolific nanoscientists in the United States to explore their perceptions about existing nanotech policies, the development of new nanotech policies, and mandatory policies about the implementation of safe lab practices for federally funded nanoresearch. In addition to exploring the scientists' perceptions about these pressing policy issues, we also test relationships between their perceptions about regulation and control variables such as gender, disciplinary affiliation, and political ideology. Last, the results of the 2011 data collection are compared with a similar mail survey that was conducted in 2007 with leading U.S. nanoscientists to explore any changes over the four-year time period in scientists' perceptions about nanotechnology policy making, and governmental involvement in nanotechnology research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)488-511
Number of pages24
JournalReview of Policy Research
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
regulation
mail survey
political ideology
policy making
gender
policy

Keywords

  • Governance
  • High-tech
  • Nanotechnology
  • National governance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

The current status and future direction of nanotechnology regulations : A view from nano-scientists. / Corley, Elizabeth; Kim, Youngjae; Scheufele, Dietram A.

In: Review of Policy Research, Vol. 30, No. 5, 09.2013, p. 488-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e81f99d95e24a50a735da59de52eeb9,
title = "The current status and future direction of nanotechnology regulations: A view from nano-scientists",
abstract = "This article presents an up-to-date view of leading U.S. nanoscientists' perceptions about the regulation of nanotechnology. Our analysis draws from the results of a 2011 mail survey with 444 of the most prolific nanoscientists in the United States to explore their perceptions about existing nanotech policies, the development of new nanotech policies, and mandatory policies about the implementation of safe lab practices for federally funded nanoresearch. In addition to exploring the scientists' perceptions about these pressing policy issues, we also test relationships between their perceptions about regulation and control variables such as gender, disciplinary affiliation, and political ideology. Last, the results of the 2011 data collection are compared with a similar mail survey that was conducted in 2007 with leading U.S. nanoscientists to explore any changes over the four-year time period in scientists' perceptions about nanotechnology policy making, and governmental involvement in nanotechnology research.",
keywords = "Governance, High-tech, Nanotechnology, National governance",
author = "Elizabeth Corley and Youngjae Kim and Scheufele, {Dietram A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/ropr.12036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "488--511",
journal = "Review of Policy Research",
issn = "0278-4416",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The current status and future direction of nanotechnology regulations

T2 - A view from nano-scientists

AU - Corley, Elizabeth

AU - Kim, Youngjae

AU - Scheufele, Dietram A.

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - This article presents an up-to-date view of leading U.S. nanoscientists' perceptions about the regulation of nanotechnology. Our analysis draws from the results of a 2011 mail survey with 444 of the most prolific nanoscientists in the United States to explore their perceptions about existing nanotech policies, the development of new nanotech policies, and mandatory policies about the implementation of safe lab practices for federally funded nanoresearch. In addition to exploring the scientists' perceptions about these pressing policy issues, we also test relationships between their perceptions about regulation and control variables such as gender, disciplinary affiliation, and political ideology. Last, the results of the 2011 data collection are compared with a similar mail survey that was conducted in 2007 with leading U.S. nanoscientists to explore any changes over the four-year time period in scientists' perceptions about nanotechnology policy making, and governmental involvement in nanotechnology research.

AB - This article presents an up-to-date view of leading U.S. nanoscientists' perceptions about the regulation of nanotechnology. Our analysis draws from the results of a 2011 mail survey with 444 of the most prolific nanoscientists in the United States to explore their perceptions about existing nanotech policies, the development of new nanotech policies, and mandatory policies about the implementation of safe lab practices for federally funded nanoresearch. In addition to exploring the scientists' perceptions about these pressing policy issues, we also test relationships between their perceptions about regulation and control variables such as gender, disciplinary affiliation, and political ideology. Last, the results of the 2011 data collection are compared with a similar mail survey that was conducted in 2007 with leading U.S. nanoscientists to explore any changes over the four-year time period in scientists' perceptions about nanotechnology policy making, and governmental involvement in nanotechnology research.

KW - Governance

KW - High-tech

KW - Nanotechnology

KW - National governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885829118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885829118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ropr.12036

DO - 10.1111/ropr.12036

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84885829118

VL - 30

SP - 488

EP - 511

JO - Review of Policy Research

JF - Review of Policy Research

SN - 0278-4416

IS - 5

ER -