The current state of Australia's evolving approach to regulating nanotechnologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Safety concerns continue to mare the development, commercialization and acceptance of nanomaterials and nano-objects. To safeguard human and environmental health, and the economic potential of nanotechnologies, a diversity of hard and soft responses have been implemented by governments and regulators over the past five years. This article focuses on the evolving policy and regulatory landscape for nanotechnologies in Australia. Since the independent review examining the adequacy of relevant federal health and safety regulatory regimes in 2006-07 for nanotechnologies, the technology has continued to receive attention from the public, private and community sectors. This article traces these developments and debates. It notes that while critics continue to voice concern over the approach adopted by the federal government-especially in light of the recent leg-islative reforms in the European Union-the regulatory status quo has been challenged. Preference for softer regulatory approaches is evident, as too is a focus on scientific principles rather than contested definitions. We speculate that this light-touch approach to regulation shall continue for the foreseeable future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)330-342
Number of pages13
JournalNanotechnology Law and Business
Volume9
Issue number4
StatePublished - Mar 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
Nanotechnology
Health
commercialization
health
Nanostructured materials
Federal Government
critic
acceptance
regulation
reform
Economics
community
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Law
  • Bioengineering

Cite this

The current state of Australia's evolving approach to regulating nanotechnologies. / Bowman, Diana; Bennett, Michael.

In: Nanotechnology Law and Business, Vol. 9, No. 4, 03.2013, p. 330-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2b4412b4b0404e57a7897be1a72e0ea1,
title = "The current state of Australia's evolving approach to regulating nanotechnologies",
abstract = "Safety concerns continue to mare the development, commercialization and acceptance of nanomaterials and nano-objects. To safeguard human and environmental health, and the economic potential of nanotechnologies, a diversity of hard and soft responses have been implemented by governments and regulators over the past five years. This article focuses on the evolving policy and regulatory landscape for nanotechnologies in Australia. Since the independent review examining the adequacy of relevant federal health and safety regulatory regimes in 2006-07 for nanotechnologies, the technology has continued to receive attention from the public, private and community sectors. This article traces these developments and debates. It notes that while critics continue to voice concern over the approach adopted by the federal government-especially in light of the recent leg-islative reforms in the European Union-the regulatory status quo has been challenged. Preference for softer regulatory approaches is evident, as too is a focus on scientific principles rather than contested definitions. We speculate that this light-touch approach to regulation shall continue for the foreseeable future.",
author = "Diana Bowman and Michael Bennett",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "330--342",
journal = "Nanotechnology Law and Business",
issn = "1546-2080",
publisher = "Nanotechnology Law and Business",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The current state of Australia's evolving approach to regulating nanotechnologies

AU - Bowman, Diana

AU - Bennett, Michael

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Safety concerns continue to mare the development, commercialization and acceptance of nanomaterials and nano-objects. To safeguard human and environmental health, and the economic potential of nanotechnologies, a diversity of hard and soft responses have been implemented by governments and regulators over the past five years. This article focuses on the evolving policy and regulatory landscape for nanotechnologies in Australia. Since the independent review examining the adequacy of relevant federal health and safety regulatory regimes in 2006-07 for nanotechnologies, the technology has continued to receive attention from the public, private and community sectors. This article traces these developments and debates. It notes that while critics continue to voice concern over the approach adopted by the federal government-especially in light of the recent leg-islative reforms in the European Union-the regulatory status quo has been challenged. Preference for softer regulatory approaches is evident, as too is a focus on scientific principles rather than contested definitions. We speculate that this light-touch approach to regulation shall continue for the foreseeable future.

AB - Safety concerns continue to mare the development, commercialization and acceptance of nanomaterials and nano-objects. To safeguard human and environmental health, and the economic potential of nanotechnologies, a diversity of hard and soft responses have been implemented by governments and regulators over the past five years. This article focuses on the evolving policy and regulatory landscape for nanotechnologies in Australia. Since the independent review examining the adequacy of relevant federal health and safety regulatory regimes in 2006-07 for nanotechnologies, the technology has continued to receive attention from the public, private and community sectors. This article traces these developments and debates. It notes that while critics continue to voice concern over the approach adopted by the federal government-especially in light of the recent leg-islative reforms in the European Union-the regulatory status quo has been challenged. Preference for softer regulatory approaches is evident, as too is a focus on scientific principles rather than contested definitions. We speculate that this light-touch approach to regulation shall continue for the foreseeable future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881517432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881517432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84881517432

VL - 9

SP - 330

EP - 342

JO - Nanotechnology Law and Business

JF - Nanotechnology Law and Business

SN - 1546-2080

IS - 4

ER -