The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters

Nancy Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite federal and state legislation aimed at producing equitable treatment of youth in the juvenile court system, studies continue to find that race and ethnicity play a significant role in juvenile court outcomes. To date, few studies have examined the cumulative effects of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes. In this study, a random sample of youth processed in Arizona during 2000 (N = 23,156) was used to examine how race and ethnicity influence diversion, petition, detention, adjudication, and disposition decisions. Analyses show that black, Latino, and American Indian youth were treated more severely in juvenile court outcomes than their white counterparts. Also, youth who were detained preadjudication were more likely to have a petition filed, less likely to have petitions dismissed, and more likely to be removed from the home at disposition. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)391-413
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

North American Indians
Legislation
Hispanic Americans
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Detention
  • Disproportionate minority contact
  • Ethnicity
  • Juvenile court
  • Race

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters. / Rodriguez, Nancy.

In: Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2010, p. 391-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8b5a1d26f6c948bfb8eb540d85f44f14,
title = "The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters",
abstract = "Despite federal and state legislation aimed at producing equitable treatment of youth in the juvenile court system, studies continue to find that race and ethnicity play a significant role in juvenile court outcomes. To date, few studies have examined the cumulative effects of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes. In this study, a random sample of youth processed in Arizona during 2000 (N = 23,156) was used to examine how race and ethnicity influence diversion, petition, detention, adjudication, and disposition decisions. Analyses show that black, Latino, and American Indian youth were treated more severely in juvenile court outcomes than their white counterparts. Also, youth who were detained preadjudication were more likely to have a petition filed, less likely to have petitions dismissed, and more likely to be removed from the home at disposition. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.",
keywords = "Detention, Disproportionate minority contact, Ethnicity, Juvenile court, Race",
author = "Nancy Rodriguez",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1177/0022427810365905",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "391--413",
journal = "Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency",
issn = "0022-4278",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters

AU - Rodriguez, Nancy

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Despite federal and state legislation aimed at producing equitable treatment of youth in the juvenile court system, studies continue to find that race and ethnicity play a significant role in juvenile court outcomes. To date, few studies have examined the cumulative effects of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes. In this study, a random sample of youth processed in Arizona during 2000 (N = 23,156) was used to examine how race and ethnicity influence diversion, petition, detention, adjudication, and disposition decisions. Analyses show that black, Latino, and American Indian youth were treated more severely in juvenile court outcomes than their white counterparts. Also, youth who were detained preadjudication were more likely to have a petition filed, less likely to have petitions dismissed, and more likely to be removed from the home at disposition. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

AB - Despite federal and state legislation aimed at producing equitable treatment of youth in the juvenile court system, studies continue to find that race and ethnicity play a significant role in juvenile court outcomes. To date, few studies have examined the cumulative effects of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes. In this study, a random sample of youth processed in Arizona during 2000 (N = 23,156) was used to examine how race and ethnicity influence diversion, petition, detention, adjudication, and disposition decisions. Analyses show that black, Latino, and American Indian youth were treated more severely in juvenile court outcomes than their white counterparts. Also, youth who were detained preadjudication were more likely to have a petition filed, less likely to have petitions dismissed, and more likely to be removed from the home at disposition. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

KW - Detention

KW - Disproportionate minority contact

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Juvenile court

KW - Race

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954915030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954915030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022427810365905

DO - 10.1177/0022427810365905

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954915030

VL - 47

SP - 391

EP - 413

JO - Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

JF - Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

SN - 0022-4278

IS - 3

ER -