The CP and split CP cross-linguistically: The layer parameter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, I argue that languages differ as to whether their clausal complements constitute Complementizer Phrases (CPs) or split CPs in the sense of Rizzi (1997). I also show that Modern English finite complements are always split but that the specification of mood in these complements accounts for phenomena such as negative raising, the presence of certain complementizers and embedded topicalizations. Older varieties of English do not provide evidence for a split CP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-403
Number of pages35
JournalWord
Volume55
Issue number3
StatePublished - Dec 2004

Fingerprint

mood
language
evidence
Split
Complementizer Phrase
Layer
Mood
Language
Varieties of English
Complementizer
Topicalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

The CP and split CP cross-linguistically : The layer parameter. / Van Gelderen, Elly.

In: Word, Vol. 55, No. 3, 12.2004, p. 369-403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{db9e5ef146f54503bf0891185ddbac65,
title = "The CP and split CP cross-linguistically: The layer parameter",
abstract = "In this article, I argue that languages differ as to whether their clausal complements constitute Complementizer Phrases (CPs) or split CPs in the sense of Rizzi (1997). I also show that Modern English finite complements are always split but that the specification of mood in these complements accounts for phenomena such as negative raising, the presence of certain complementizers and embedded topicalizations. Older varieties of English do not provide evidence for a split CP.",
author = "{Van Gelderen}, Elly",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "369--403",
journal = "Word",
issn = "0043-7956",
publisher = "International Linguistic Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The CP and split CP cross-linguistically

T2 - The layer parameter

AU - Van Gelderen, Elly

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - In this article, I argue that languages differ as to whether their clausal complements constitute Complementizer Phrases (CPs) or split CPs in the sense of Rizzi (1997). I also show that Modern English finite complements are always split but that the specification of mood in these complements accounts for phenomena such as negative raising, the presence of certain complementizers and embedded topicalizations. Older varieties of English do not provide evidence for a split CP.

AB - In this article, I argue that languages differ as to whether their clausal complements constitute Complementizer Phrases (CPs) or split CPs in the sense of Rizzi (1997). I also show that Modern English finite complements are always split but that the specification of mood in these complements accounts for phenomena such as negative raising, the presence of certain complementizers and embedded topicalizations. Older varieties of English do not provide evidence for a split CP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248703931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248703931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34248703931

VL - 55

SP - 369

EP - 403

JO - Word

JF - Word

SN - 0043-7956

IS - 3

ER -