The CP and split CP cross-linguistically: The layer parameter

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, I argue that languages differ as to whether their clausal complements constitute Complementizer Phrases (CPs) or split CPs in the sense of Rizzi (1997). I also show that Modern English finite complements are always split but that the specification of mood in these complements accounts for phenomena such as negative raising, the presence of certain complementizers and embedded topicalizations. Older varieties of English do not provide evidence for a split CP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-403
Number of pages35
JournalWord
Volume55
Issue number3
StatePublished - Dec 1 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The CP and split CP cross-linguistically: The layer parameter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this