The Cost of Providing an Adequate Education to English Language Learners: A Review of the Literature

Oscar Jimenez-Castellanos, Amelia M. Topper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article systematically reviews the cost study literature as it relates to the treatment of English language learners (ELLs). Despite the substantial number of costing out studies that have been conducted over the past several decades, the school finance literature has failed to focus on ELLs-the fastest growing segment of the school-age population. Little attention has been paid to how ELL students are treated under the various costing out methodologies or which approaches yield the most useful results. The two criterion to select the costing out literature to review included (a) peer-reviewed journal articles and commissioned reports that used one of the four primary cost study methodologies (professional judgment panel, successful school model, evidence-based model, and cost function analysis), and (b) studies published after 1990 that focused on generating statewide funding recommendations at the district level. A total of 70 empirical cost studies met these criteria. The review concludes that there is substantial variability in the treatment of ELLs across cost study methodologies, although all methods agree that current funding levels are insufficient to meet specified performance standards. To comprehensively assess the resource needs of this growing school population, cost studies that specifically focus on ELLs will need to be conducted to improve transparency and representativeness for ELLs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-232
Number of pages54
JournalReview of Educational Research
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

English language
costs
education
methodology
funding
school model
school
performance standard
transparency
literature
finance
district
resources
evidence
student

Keywords

  • adequate education
  • cost study
  • costing out
  • education finance
  • English language learners

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

The Cost of Providing an Adequate Education to English Language Learners : A Review of the Literature. / Jimenez-Castellanos, Oscar; Topper, Amelia M.

In: Review of Educational Research, Vol. 82, No. 2, 06.2012, p. 179-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jimenez-Castellanos, Oscar ; Topper, Amelia M. / The Cost of Providing an Adequate Education to English Language Learners : A Review of the Literature. In: Review of Educational Research. 2012 ; Vol. 82, No. 2. pp. 179-232.
@article{9d580c7916f84ccfa14e295610e3a6dd,
title = "The Cost of Providing an Adequate Education to English Language Learners: A Review of the Literature",
abstract = "This article systematically reviews the cost study literature as it relates to the treatment of English language learners (ELLs). Despite the substantial number of costing out studies that have been conducted over the past several decades, the school finance literature has failed to focus on ELLs-the fastest growing segment of the school-age population. Little attention has been paid to how ELL students are treated under the various costing out methodologies or which approaches yield the most useful results. The two criterion to select the costing out literature to review included (a) peer-reviewed journal articles and commissioned reports that used one of the four primary cost study methodologies (professional judgment panel, successful school model, evidence-based model, and cost function analysis), and (b) studies published after 1990 that focused on generating statewide funding recommendations at the district level. A total of 70 empirical cost studies met these criteria. The review concludes that there is substantial variability in the treatment of ELLs across cost study methodologies, although all methods agree that current funding levels are insufficient to meet specified performance standards. To comprehensively assess the resource needs of this growing school population, cost studies that specifically focus on ELLs will need to be conducted to improve transparency and representativeness for ELLs.",
keywords = "adequate education, cost study, costing out, education finance, English language learners",
author = "Oscar Jimenez-Castellanos and Topper, {Amelia M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.3102/0034654312449872",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "179--232",
journal = "Review of Educational Research",
issn = "0034-6543",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Cost of Providing an Adequate Education to English Language Learners

T2 - A Review of the Literature

AU - Jimenez-Castellanos, Oscar

AU - Topper, Amelia M.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - This article systematically reviews the cost study literature as it relates to the treatment of English language learners (ELLs). Despite the substantial number of costing out studies that have been conducted over the past several decades, the school finance literature has failed to focus on ELLs-the fastest growing segment of the school-age population. Little attention has been paid to how ELL students are treated under the various costing out methodologies or which approaches yield the most useful results. The two criterion to select the costing out literature to review included (a) peer-reviewed journal articles and commissioned reports that used one of the four primary cost study methodologies (professional judgment panel, successful school model, evidence-based model, and cost function analysis), and (b) studies published after 1990 that focused on generating statewide funding recommendations at the district level. A total of 70 empirical cost studies met these criteria. The review concludes that there is substantial variability in the treatment of ELLs across cost study methodologies, although all methods agree that current funding levels are insufficient to meet specified performance standards. To comprehensively assess the resource needs of this growing school population, cost studies that specifically focus on ELLs will need to be conducted to improve transparency and representativeness for ELLs.

AB - This article systematically reviews the cost study literature as it relates to the treatment of English language learners (ELLs). Despite the substantial number of costing out studies that have been conducted over the past several decades, the school finance literature has failed to focus on ELLs-the fastest growing segment of the school-age population. Little attention has been paid to how ELL students are treated under the various costing out methodologies or which approaches yield the most useful results. The two criterion to select the costing out literature to review included (a) peer-reviewed journal articles and commissioned reports that used one of the four primary cost study methodologies (professional judgment panel, successful school model, evidence-based model, and cost function analysis), and (b) studies published after 1990 that focused on generating statewide funding recommendations at the district level. A total of 70 empirical cost studies met these criteria. The review concludes that there is substantial variability in the treatment of ELLs across cost study methodologies, although all methods agree that current funding levels are insufficient to meet specified performance standards. To comprehensively assess the resource needs of this growing school population, cost studies that specifically focus on ELLs will need to be conducted to improve transparency and representativeness for ELLs.

KW - adequate education

KW - cost study

KW - costing out

KW - education finance

KW - English language learners

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862195481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862195481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3102/0034654312449872

DO - 10.3102/0034654312449872

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84862195481

VL - 82

SP - 179

EP - 232

JO - Review of Educational Research

JF - Review of Educational Research

SN - 0034-6543

IS - 2

ER -