The cost of ‘best value’ construction

Dean Kashiwagi, John Savicky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the major objectives of facility owners is to get the ‘best value’ in construction, renovation or maintenance of facilities. Owners are reluctant to pay more for best value if they do not understand what the value is. Research now proposes that the use of best value procurement can actually reduce the first costs of delivering the construction. The research looks at the transaction costs or the first costs of construction. The research uses the procurement of roofing in the State of Hawaii because of the availability of data on both the low-bid and best value procurements. The State of Hawaii used transaction cost analysis to identify the cost of best value construction. The costs considered were planning and programming, design, procurement, construction management and inspection costs. Owing to the number of projects and the access to budget figures, construction cost figures, design costs and construction times, the State was able to identify the relative transaction costs and performance for both processes. The first costs or transaction costs of the best value procurements were lower than the transaction costs of the traditional design-bid-build costs. The actual performances of the roofing systems procured, which included warranty period, performance of the contractor and performance of the roofing systems, were far superior. The result was an increase in value for a lower cost.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)285-297
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Facilities Management
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Costs
Procurement
Transaction costs
Contractors
Inspection
Availability
Planning
Owners
Bid

Keywords

  • Construction management
  • Financial management
  • Transaction cost

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Business and International Management

Cite this

The cost of ‘best value’ construction. / Kashiwagi, Dean; Savicky, John.

In: Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. 2, No. 3, 01.07.2003, p. 285-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kashiwagi, Dean ; Savicky, John. / The cost of ‘best value’ construction. In: Journal of Facilities Management. 2003 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 285-297.
@article{4f871302dd0b4fb9a32caa210bc62124,
title = "The cost of ‘best value’ construction",
abstract = "One of the major objectives of facility owners is to get the ‘best value’ in construction, renovation or maintenance of facilities. Owners are reluctant to pay more for best value if they do not understand what the value is. Research now proposes that the use of best value procurement can actually reduce the first costs of delivering the construction. The research looks at the transaction costs or the first costs of construction. The research uses the procurement of roofing in the State of Hawaii because of the availability of data on both the low-bid and best value procurements. The State of Hawaii used transaction cost analysis to identify the cost of best value construction. The costs considered were planning and programming, design, procurement, construction management and inspection costs. Owing to the number of projects and the access to budget figures, construction cost figures, design costs and construction times, the State was able to identify the relative transaction costs and performance for both processes. The first costs or transaction costs of the best value procurements were lower than the transaction costs of the traditional design-bid-build costs. The actual performances of the roofing systems procured, which included warranty period, performance of the contractor and performance of the roofing systems, were far superior. The result was an increase in value for a lower cost.",
keywords = "Construction management, Financial management, Transaction cost",
author = "Dean Kashiwagi and John Savicky",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/14725960410808267",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "285--297",
journal = "Journal of Facilities Management",
issn = "1472-5967",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The cost of ‘best value’ construction

AU - Kashiwagi, Dean

AU - Savicky, John

PY - 2003/7/1

Y1 - 2003/7/1

N2 - One of the major objectives of facility owners is to get the ‘best value’ in construction, renovation or maintenance of facilities. Owners are reluctant to pay more for best value if they do not understand what the value is. Research now proposes that the use of best value procurement can actually reduce the first costs of delivering the construction. The research looks at the transaction costs or the first costs of construction. The research uses the procurement of roofing in the State of Hawaii because of the availability of data on both the low-bid and best value procurements. The State of Hawaii used transaction cost analysis to identify the cost of best value construction. The costs considered were planning and programming, design, procurement, construction management and inspection costs. Owing to the number of projects and the access to budget figures, construction cost figures, design costs and construction times, the State was able to identify the relative transaction costs and performance for both processes. The first costs or transaction costs of the best value procurements were lower than the transaction costs of the traditional design-bid-build costs. The actual performances of the roofing systems procured, which included warranty period, performance of the contractor and performance of the roofing systems, were far superior. The result was an increase in value for a lower cost.

AB - One of the major objectives of facility owners is to get the ‘best value’ in construction, renovation or maintenance of facilities. Owners are reluctant to pay more for best value if they do not understand what the value is. Research now proposes that the use of best value procurement can actually reduce the first costs of delivering the construction. The research looks at the transaction costs or the first costs of construction. The research uses the procurement of roofing in the State of Hawaii because of the availability of data on both the low-bid and best value procurements. The State of Hawaii used transaction cost analysis to identify the cost of best value construction. The costs considered were planning and programming, design, procurement, construction management and inspection costs. Owing to the number of projects and the access to budget figures, construction cost figures, design costs and construction times, the State was able to identify the relative transaction costs and performance for both processes. The first costs or transaction costs of the best value procurements were lower than the transaction costs of the traditional design-bid-build costs. The actual performances of the roofing systems procured, which included warranty period, performance of the contractor and performance of the roofing systems, were far superior. The result was an increase in value for a lower cost.

KW - Construction management

KW - Financial management

KW - Transaction cost

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849185814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849185814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/14725960410808267

DO - 10.1108/14725960410808267

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38849185814

VL - 2

SP - 285

EP - 297

JO - Journal of Facilities Management

JF - Journal of Facilities Management

SN - 1472-5967

IS - 3

ER -