The corrective actions organizations pursue following misconduct: A review and research Agenda

Matt C. Hersel, Catherine A. Helmuth, Michelle L. Zorn, Christine Shropshire, Jason W. Ridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Organizational misconduct has substantial effects on the well-being of a firm and its stakeholders. As this body of work has grown, organizational scholars have devoted considerable research attention toward understanding how firms can minimize the negative effects of misconduct through various corrective actions. Consequently, discrete research streams have formed around specific types of organizational misconduct and corrective actions, which has left the literature without a unifying theoretical model. We provide a conceptual synthesis and typology that aggregates disconnected concepts into the higher order constructs of organizational misconduct (executive dismissal, product recalls, organizational accounts, and policy changes) and corrective actions (fraud, product safety issues, employee mistreatment, and environmental vio-lations). Using the theoretical tenets of stakeholder salience and managerial cognition, we offer insight and future research directions about managers’ decision-making processes following misconduct and why firms respond using accommodative versus defensive strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)547-585
Number of pages39
JournalAcademy of Management Annals
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Research agenda
Employees
Well-being
Policy change
Product recall
Decision-making process
Managers
Stakeholder salience
Defensive strategy
Managerial cognition
Fraud
Research directions
Product safety
Stakeholders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

The corrective actions organizations pursue following misconduct : A review and research Agenda. / Hersel, Matt C.; Helmuth, Catherine A.; Zorn, Michelle L.; Shropshire, Christine; Ridge, Jason W.

In: Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.07.2019, p. 547-585.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hersel, Matt C. ; Helmuth, Catherine A. ; Zorn, Michelle L. ; Shropshire, Christine ; Ridge, Jason W. / The corrective actions organizations pursue following misconduct : A review and research Agenda. In: Academy of Management Annals. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 547-585.
@article{76340a1f0b7e47f0a0ef8c7630cd1d9b,
title = "The corrective actions organizations pursue following misconduct: A review and research Agenda",
abstract = "Organizational misconduct has substantial effects on the well-being of a firm and its stakeholders. As this body of work has grown, organizational scholars have devoted considerable research attention toward understanding how firms can minimize the negative effects of misconduct through various corrective actions. Consequently, discrete research streams have formed around specific types of organizational misconduct and corrective actions, which has left the literature without a unifying theoretical model. We provide a conceptual synthesis and typology that aggregates disconnected concepts into the higher order constructs of organizational misconduct (executive dismissal, product recalls, organizational accounts, and policy changes) and corrective actions (fraud, product safety issues, employee mistreatment, and environmental vio-lations). Using the theoretical tenets of stakeholder salience and managerial cognition, we offer insight and future research directions about managers’ decision-making processes following misconduct and why firms respond using accommodative versus defensive strategies.",
author = "Hersel, {Matt C.} and Helmuth, {Catherine A.} and Zorn, {Michelle L.} and Christine Shropshire and Ridge, {Jason W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/annals.2017.0090",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "547--585",
journal = "Academy of Management Annals",
issn = "1941-6520",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The corrective actions organizations pursue following misconduct

T2 - A review and research Agenda

AU - Hersel, Matt C.

AU - Helmuth, Catherine A.

AU - Zorn, Michelle L.

AU - Shropshire, Christine

AU - Ridge, Jason W.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Organizational misconduct has substantial effects on the well-being of a firm and its stakeholders. As this body of work has grown, organizational scholars have devoted considerable research attention toward understanding how firms can minimize the negative effects of misconduct through various corrective actions. Consequently, discrete research streams have formed around specific types of organizational misconduct and corrective actions, which has left the literature without a unifying theoretical model. We provide a conceptual synthesis and typology that aggregates disconnected concepts into the higher order constructs of organizational misconduct (executive dismissal, product recalls, organizational accounts, and policy changes) and corrective actions (fraud, product safety issues, employee mistreatment, and environmental vio-lations). Using the theoretical tenets of stakeholder salience and managerial cognition, we offer insight and future research directions about managers’ decision-making processes following misconduct and why firms respond using accommodative versus defensive strategies.

AB - Organizational misconduct has substantial effects on the well-being of a firm and its stakeholders. As this body of work has grown, organizational scholars have devoted considerable research attention toward understanding how firms can minimize the negative effects of misconduct through various corrective actions. Consequently, discrete research streams have formed around specific types of organizational misconduct and corrective actions, which has left the literature without a unifying theoretical model. We provide a conceptual synthesis and typology that aggregates disconnected concepts into the higher order constructs of organizational misconduct (executive dismissal, product recalls, organizational accounts, and policy changes) and corrective actions (fraud, product safety issues, employee mistreatment, and environmental vio-lations). Using the theoretical tenets of stakeholder salience and managerial cognition, we offer insight and future research directions about managers’ decision-making processes following misconduct and why firms respond using accommodative versus defensive strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070011230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070011230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/annals.2017.0090

DO - 10.5465/annals.2017.0090

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070011230

VL - 13

SP - 547

EP - 585

JO - Academy of Management Annals

JF - Academy of Management Annals

SN - 1941-6520

IS - 2

ER -