The construction of technology and place: Concentrating solar power conflicts in the United States

Sharlissa Moore, Edward J. Hackett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is sufficient space in the United States to site large-scale renewable energy technologies, yet siting decisions are often highly contentious with conflicting land-use values. This paper examines conflicts surrounding large-scale solar power siting through the lens of place-making and the co-shaping of place and technology. It traces the place-based conflicts over the Ivanpah solar power plant in California over five years, from designed to operational, in order to understand the evolving public engagement process in issues of place. Place-making can aid in understanding conflicts over renewable energy siting by interpreting stakeholder values. Through the place-making process, both the place and technology were shaped but could only be bent so far until they became something else entirely, making the negotiation of trade-offs difficult and the object of the negotiation a moving target. Moving forward, the challenge should be addressed that the technology and place must be sufficiently concrete to engage the public in siting decisions but accomplished early enough to avoid polarization and to facilitate mutual accommodation. Innovative forms of place-based participation are needed that would help citizens to debate the properties and trade-offs of energy systems in constructive ways downstream without damaging or breaking trust.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-78
Number of pages12
JournalEnergy Research and Social Science
Volume11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Solar energy
renewable energy
energy technology
power plant
Solar power plants
polarization
accommodation
land use
stakeholder
Land use
citizen
energy
Lenses
participation
Concretes
Polarization
Values

Keywords

  • Energy governance
  • Place-making
  • Solar siting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Fuel Technology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The construction of technology and place : Concentrating solar power conflicts in the United States. / Moore, Sharlissa; Hackett, Edward J.

In: Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 11, 01.01.2016, p. 67-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef67d2b1135442ec93681cad6ee41a1d,
title = "The construction of technology and place: Concentrating solar power conflicts in the United States",
abstract = "There is sufficient space in the United States to site large-scale renewable energy technologies, yet siting decisions are often highly contentious with conflicting land-use values. This paper examines conflicts surrounding large-scale solar power siting through the lens of place-making and the co-shaping of place and technology. It traces the place-based conflicts over the Ivanpah solar power plant in California over five years, from designed to operational, in order to understand the evolving public engagement process in issues of place. Place-making can aid in understanding conflicts over renewable energy siting by interpreting stakeholder values. Through the place-making process, both the place and technology were shaped but could only be bent so far until they became something else entirely, making the negotiation of trade-offs difficult and the object of the negotiation a moving target. Moving forward, the challenge should be addressed that the technology and place must be sufficiently concrete to engage the public in siting decisions but accomplished early enough to avoid polarization and to facilitate mutual accommodation. Innovative forms of place-based participation are needed that would help citizens to debate the properties and trade-offs of energy systems in constructive ways downstream without damaging or breaking trust.",
keywords = "Energy governance, Place-making, Solar siting",
author = "Sharlissa Moore and Hackett, {Edward J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "67--78",
journal = "Energy Research and Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The construction of technology and place

T2 - Concentrating solar power conflicts in the United States

AU - Moore, Sharlissa

AU - Hackett, Edward J.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - There is sufficient space in the United States to site large-scale renewable energy technologies, yet siting decisions are often highly contentious with conflicting land-use values. This paper examines conflicts surrounding large-scale solar power siting through the lens of place-making and the co-shaping of place and technology. It traces the place-based conflicts over the Ivanpah solar power plant in California over five years, from designed to operational, in order to understand the evolving public engagement process in issues of place. Place-making can aid in understanding conflicts over renewable energy siting by interpreting stakeholder values. Through the place-making process, both the place and technology were shaped but could only be bent so far until they became something else entirely, making the negotiation of trade-offs difficult and the object of the negotiation a moving target. Moving forward, the challenge should be addressed that the technology and place must be sufficiently concrete to engage the public in siting decisions but accomplished early enough to avoid polarization and to facilitate mutual accommodation. Innovative forms of place-based participation are needed that would help citizens to debate the properties and trade-offs of energy systems in constructive ways downstream without damaging or breaking trust.

AB - There is sufficient space in the United States to site large-scale renewable energy technologies, yet siting decisions are often highly contentious with conflicting land-use values. This paper examines conflicts surrounding large-scale solar power siting through the lens of place-making and the co-shaping of place and technology. It traces the place-based conflicts over the Ivanpah solar power plant in California over five years, from designed to operational, in order to understand the evolving public engagement process in issues of place. Place-making can aid in understanding conflicts over renewable energy siting by interpreting stakeholder values. Through the place-making process, both the place and technology were shaped but could only be bent so far until they became something else entirely, making the negotiation of trade-offs difficult and the object of the negotiation a moving target. Moving forward, the challenge should be addressed that the technology and place must be sufficiently concrete to engage the public in siting decisions but accomplished early enough to avoid polarization and to facilitate mutual accommodation. Innovative forms of place-based participation are needed that would help citizens to debate the properties and trade-offs of energy systems in constructive ways downstream without damaging or breaking trust.

KW - Energy governance

KW - Place-making

KW - Solar siting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942155172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942155172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84942155172

VL - 11

SP - 67

EP - 78

JO - Energy Research and Social Science

JF - Energy Research and Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

ER -