The construct of resilience

A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work

Suniya Luthar, Dante Cicchetti, Bronwyn Becker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3132 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a critical appraisal of resilience, a construct connoting the maintenance of positive adaptation by individuals despite experiences of significant adversity. As empirical research on resilience has burgeoned in recent years, criticisms have been levied at work in this area. These critiques have generally focused on ambiguities in definitions and central terminology; heterogeneity in risks experienced and competence achieved by individuals viewed as resilient; instability of the phenomenon of resilience; and concerns regarding the usefulness of resilience as a theoretical construct. We address each identified criticism in turn, proposing solutions for those we view as legitimate and clarifying misunderstandings surrounding those we believe to be less valid. We conclude that work on resilience possesses substantial potential for augmenting the understanding of processes affecting at-risk individuals. Realization of the potential embodied by this construct, however, will remain constrained without continued scientific attention to some of the serious conceptual and methodological pitfalls that have been noted by skeptics and proponents alike.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-562
Number of pages20
JournalChild Development
Volume71
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

resilience
Guidelines
Empirical Research
evaluation
Terminology
Mental Competency
criticism
technical language
empirical research
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The construct of resilience : A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. / Luthar, Suniya; Cicchetti, Dante; Becker, Bronwyn.

In: Child Development, Vol. 71, No. 3, 05.2000, p. 543-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Luthar, Suniya ; Cicchetti, Dante ; Becker, Bronwyn. / The construct of resilience : A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. In: Child Development. 2000 ; Vol. 71, No. 3. pp. 543-562.
@article{4f7c4cadc8ac4a68824a741f6a7b30e8,
title = "The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work",
abstract = "This paper presents a critical appraisal of resilience, a construct connoting the maintenance of positive adaptation by individuals despite experiences of significant adversity. As empirical research on resilience has burgeoned in recent years, criticisms have been levied at work in this area. These critiques have generally focused on ambiguities in definitions and central terminology; heterogeneity in risks experienced and competence achieved by individuals viewed as resilient; instability of the phenomenon of resilience; and concerns regarding the usefulness of resilience as a theoretical construct. We address each identified criticism in turn, proposing solutions for those we view as legitimate and clarifying misunderstandings surrounding those we believe to be less valid. We conclude that work on resilience possesses substantial potential for augmenting the understanding of processes affecting at-risk individuals. Realization of the potential embodied by this construct, however, will remain constrained without continued scientific attention to some of the serious conceptual and methodological pitfalls that have been noted by skeptics and proponents alike.",
author = "Suniya Luthar and Dante Cicchetti and Bronwyn Becker",
year = "2000",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "543--562",
journal = "Child Development",
issn = "0009-3920",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The construct of resilience

T2 - A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work

AU - Luthar, Suniya

AU - Cicchetti, Dante

AU - Becker, Bronwyn

PY - 2000/5

Y1 - 2000/5

N2 - This paper presents a critical appraisal of resilience, a construct connoting the maintenance of positive adaptation by individuals despite experiences of significant adversity. As empirical research on resilience has burgeoned in recent years, criticisms have been levied at work in this area. These critiques have generally focused on ambiguities in definitions and central terminology; heterogeneity in risks experienced and competence achieved by individuals viewed as resilient; instability of the phenomenon of resilience; and concerns regarding the usefulness of resilience as a theoretical construct. We address each identified criticism in turn, proposing solutions for those we view as legitimate and clarifying misunderstandings surrounding those we believe to be less valid. We conclude that work on resilience possesses substantial potential for augmenting the understanding of processes affecting at-risk individuals. Realization of the potential embodied by this construct, however, will remain constrained without continued scientific attention to some of the serious conceptual and methodological pitfalls that have been noted by skeptics and proponents alike.

AB - This paper presents a critical appraisal of resilience, a construct connoting the maintenance of positive adaptation by individuals despite experiences of significant adversity. As empirical research on resilience has burgeoned in recent years, criticisms have been levied at work in this area. These critiques have generally focused on ambiguities in definitions and central terminology; heterogeneity in risks experienced and competence achieved by individuals viewed as resilient; instability of the phenomenon of resilience; and concerns regarding the usefulness of resilience as a theoretical construct. We address each identified criticism in turn, proposing solutions for those we view as legitimate and clarifying misunderstandings surrounding those we believe to be less valid. We conclude that work on resilience possesses substantial potential for augmenting the understanding of processes affecting at-risk individuals. Realization of the potential embodied by this construct, however, will remain constrained without continued scientific attention to some of the serious conceptual and methodological pitfalls that have been noted by skeptics and proponents alike.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034180852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034180852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 543

EP - 562

JO - Child Development

JF - Child Development

SN - 0009-3920

IS - 3

ER -