The changing nature and scope of public health emergencies in response to annual flu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The rapid spread of influenza during the 2012-13 season brought a series of public health challenges and corresponding response efforts. For decades, responses to annual flu have been undertaken routinely without extensive legal intervention. With the recent declaration of states of public health emergencies in Boston (January 9, 2013) and New York State (January 12, 2013), however, the legal baseline is changing. Propelled by a slate of state and local emergency declarations during the 2009-10 H1N1 pandemic, public officials are beginning to show cause for the issuance of formal emergency declarations in support of flu response efforts. The legal effects of these types of declarations are profound. Public and private actors are given significant, expedited public health powers. Scarce resources like vaccines can be more efficiently allocated. Laws relating to licensure, scope of practice, and liability can be effectively waived. Though originally conceptualized and once reserved for catastrophic, long-term health-related or bioterrorism events, public health emergency declarations are evolving to address temporary impacts on health care and public health services arising annually from flu outbreaks. This commentary explores the changing nature of public health emergencies and their current and potential impact on the provision of healthcare services in response to national or regional threats to the public's health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)142-144
Number of pages3
JournalBiosecurity and Bioterrorism
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013

Fingerprint

Public health
public health
Emergencies
Public Health
health care
Delivery of Health Care
Bioterrorism
public health services
bioterrorism
United States Public Health Service
Slate
Pandemics
Licensure
influenza
Vaccines
slate
vaccine
liability
Human Influenza
contagious disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

The changing nature and scope of public health emergencies in response to annual flu. / Hodge, James.

In: Biosecurity and Bioterrorism, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.06.2013, p. 142-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a4586ed26264cf595491a3dc589fc39,
title = "The changing nature and scope of public health emergencies in response to annual flu",
abstract = "The rapid spread of influenza during the 2012-13 season brought a series of public health challenges and corresponding response efforts. For decades, responses to annual flu have been undertaken routinely without extensive legal intervention. With the recent declaration of states of public health emergencies in Boston (January 9, 2013) and New York State (January 12, 2013), however, the legal baseline is changing. Propelled by a slate of state and local emergency declarations during the 2009-10 H1N1 pandemic, public officials are beginning to show cause for the issuance of formal emergency declarations in support of flu response efforts. The legal effects of these types of declarations are profound. Public and private actors are given significant, expedited public health powers. Scarce resources like vaccines can be more efficiently allocated. Laws relating to licensure, scope of practice, and liability can be effectively waived. Though originally conceptualized and once reserved for catastrophic, long-term health-related or bioterrorism events, public health emergency declarations are evolving to address temporary impacts on health care and public health services arising annually from flu outbreaks. This commentary explores the changing nature of public health emergencies and their current and potential impact on the provision of healthcare services in response to national or regional threats to the public's health.",
author = "James Hodge",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/bsp.2013.0022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "142--144",
journal = "Health security",
issn = "2326-5094",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The changing nature and scope of public health emergencies in response to annual flu

AU - Hodge, James

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - The rapid spread of influenza during the 2012-13 season brought a series of public health challenges and corresponding response efforts. For decades, responses to annual flu have been undertaken routinely without extensive legal intervention. With the recent declaration of states of public health emergencies in Boston (January 9, 2013) and New York State (January 12, 2013), however, the legal baseline is changing. Propelled by a slate of state and local emergency declarations during the 2009-10 H1N1 pandemic, public officials are beginning to show cause for the issuance of formal emergency declarations in support of flu response efforts. The legal effects of these types of declarations are profound. Public and private actors are given significant, expedited public health powers. Scarce resources like vaccines can be more efficiently allocated. Laws relating to licensure, scope of practice, and liability can be effectively waived. Though originally conceptualized and once reserved for catastrophic, long-term health-related or bioterrorism events, public health emergency declarations are evolving to address temporary impacts on health care and public health services arising annually from flu outbreaks. This commentary explores the changing nature of public health emergencies and their current and potential impact on the provision of healthcare services in response to national or regional threats to the public's health.

AB - The rapid spread of influenza during the 2012-13 season brought a series of public health challenges and corresponding response efforts. For decades, responses to annual flu have been undertaken routinely without extensive legal intervention. With the recent declaration of states of public health emergencies in Boston (January 9, 2013) and New York State (January 12, 2013), however, the legal baseline is changing. Propelled by a slate of state and local emergency declarations during the 2009-10 H1N1 pandemic, public officials are beginning to show cause for the issuance of formal emergency declarations in support of flu response efforts. The legal effects of these types of declarations are profound. Public and private actors are given significant, expedited public health powers. Scarce resources like vaccines can be more efficiently allocated. Laws relating to licensure, scope of practice, and liability can be effectively waived. Though originally conceptualized and once reserved for catastrophic, long-term health-related or bioterrorism events, public health emergency declarations are evolving to address temporary impacts on health care and public health services arising annually from flu outbreaks. This commentary explores the changing nature of public health emergencies and their current and potential impact on the provision of healthcare services in response to national or regional threats to the public's health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879342728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879342728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/bsp.2013.0022

DO - 10.1089/bsp.2013.0022

M3 - Article

C2 - 23641729

AN - SCOPUS:84879342728

VL - 11

SP - 142

EP - 144

JO - Health security

JF - Health security

SN - 2326-5094

IS - 2

ER -