The changing face of inequality in home mortgage lending

Richard Williams, Reynold Nesiba, Eileen McConnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

144 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

American homeownership has long been characterized by racial, ethnic, and geographic inequality. Inequality in homeownership, in turn, has contributed to racial and class segregation and inequality in other aspects of American life. Recently, however, there have been signs of dramatic change, as minorities and low-income groups have achieved all-time record high rates of homeownership. To explain these developments, we compare and contrast neoclassical economic theory - which suggests that banking deregulation, increased competition, better information, and improved risk assessment reduce or eliminate mortgage market discrimination - with a sociological theory of networks - which argues industry restructuring can disrupt markets and social relationships and create new opportunities for exploitation. We argue that, as the old inequality in home mortgage lending has slowly diminished, a new inequality has emerged that is characterized by less favorable loan terms, sometimes-problematic forms of housing, and a lack of adequate consumer protection from predatory and abusive practices. Specifically, we describe trends in subprime and manufactured housing lending in U.S. MSAs. Our study finds that such loans accounted for as much as half, or more, of the gains made by underserved markets between 1993 and 2000. Subprime lenders made particularly strong inroads among minority markets at all income levels. We discuss how the old inequality helped make the new inequality possible, and how the new inequality in home mortgage lending is part of a much larger phenomenon in which apparent gains made by minorities and low income groups have come at a far higher cost than have gains by other segments of society.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-208
Number of pages28
JournalSocial Problems
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

lending
market
minority
loan
low income
housing
neoclassical theory
consumer protection
sociological theory
deregulation
economic theory
banking
risk assessment
segregation
exploitation
restructuring
discrimination
Group
income
industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The changing face of inequality in home mortgage lending. / Williams, Richard; Nesiba, Reynold; McConnell, Eileen.

In: Social Problems, Vol. 52, No. 2, 05.2005, p. 181-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, Richard ; Nesiba, Reynold ; McConnell, Eileen. / The changing face of inequality in home mortgage lending. In: Social Problems. 2005 ; Vol. 52, No. 2. pp. 181-208.
@article{8eb6669653f54198a7ba6bbd46ba45a5,
title = "The changing face of inequality in home mortgage lending",
abstract = "American homeownership has long been characterized by racial, ethnic, and geographic inequality. Inequality in homeownership, in turn, has contributed to racial and class segregation and inequality in other aspects of American life. Recently, however, there have been signs of dramatic change, as minorities and low-income groups have achieved all-time record high rates of homeownership. To explain these developments, we compare and contrast neoclassical economic theory - which suggests that banking deregulation, increased competition, better information, and improved risk assessment reduce or eliminate mortgage market discrimination - with a sociological theory of networks - which argues industry restructuring can disrupt markets and social relationships and create new opportunities for exploitation. We argue that, as the old inequality in home mortgage lending has slowly diminished, a new inequality has emerged that is characterized by less favorable loan terms, sometimes-problematic forms of housing, and a lack of adequate consumer protection from predatory and abusive practices. Specifically, we describe trends in subprime and manufactured housing lending in U.S. MSAs. Our study finds that such loans accounted for as much as half, or more, of the gains made by underserved markets between 1993 and 2000. Subprime lenders made particularly strong inroads among minority markets at all income levels. We discuss how the old inequality helped make the new inequality possible, and how the new inequality in home mortgage lending is part of a much larger phenomenon in which apparent gains made by minorities and low income groups have come at a far higher cost than have gains by other segments of society.",
author = "Richard Williams and Reynold Nesiba and Eileen McConnell",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1525/sp.2005.52.2.181",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "181--208",
journal = "Social Problems",
issn = "0037-7791",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The changing face of inequality in home mortgage lending

AU - Williams, Richard

AU - Nesiba, Reynold

AU - McConnell, Eileen

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - American homeownership has long been characterized by racial, ethnic, and geographic inequality. Inequality in homeownership, in turn, has contributed to racial and class segregation and inequality in other aspects of American life. Recently, however, there have been signs of dramatic change, as minorities and low-income groups have achieved all-time record high rates of homeownership. To explain these developments, we compare and contrast neoclassical economic theory - which suggests that banking deregulation, increased competition, better information, and improved risk assessment reduce or eliminate mortgage market discrimination - with a sociological theory of networks - which argues industry restructuring can disrupt markets and social relationships and create new opportunities for exploitation. We argue that, as the old inequality in home mortgage lending has slowly diminished, a new inequality has emerged that is characterized by less favorable loan terms, sometimes-problematic forms of housing, and a lack of adequate consumer protection from predatory and abusive practices. Specifically, we describe trends in subprime and manufactured housing lending in U.S. MSAs. Our study finds that such loans accounted for as much as half, or more, of the gains made by underserved markets between 1993 and 2000. Subprime lenders made particularly strong inroads among minority markets at all income levels. We discuss how the old inequality helped make the new inequality possible, and how the new inequality in home mortgage lending is part of a much larger phenomenon in which apparent gains made by minorities and low income groups have come at a far higher cost than have gains by other segments of society.

AB - American homeownership has long been characterized by racial, ethnic, and geographic inequality. Inequality in homeownership, in turn, has contributed to racial and class segregation and inequality in other aspects of American life. Recently, however, there have been signs of dramatic change, as minorities and low-income groups have achieved all-time record high rates of homeownership. To explain these developments, we compare and contrast neoclassical economic theory - which suggests that banking deregulation, increased competition, better information, and improved risk assessment reduce or eliminate mortgage market discrimination - with a sociological theory of networks - which argues industry restructuring can disrupt markets and social relationships and create new opportunities for exploitation. We argue that, as the old inequality in home mortgage lending has slowly diminished, a new inequality has emerged that is characterized by less favorable loan terms, sometimes-problematic forms of housing, and a lack of adequate consumer protection from predatory and abusive practices. Specifically, we describe trends in subprime and manufactured housing lending in U.S. MSAs. Our study finds that such loans accounted for as much as half, or more, of the gains made by underserved markets between 1993 and 2000. Subprime lenders made particularly strong inroads among minority markets at all income levels. We discuss how the old inequality helped make the new inequality possible, and how the new inequality in home mortgage lending is part of a much larger phenomenon in which apparent gains made by minorities and low income groups have come at a far higher cost than have gains by other segments of society.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19744379158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19744379158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/sp.2005.52.2.181

DO - 10.1525/sp.2005.52.2.181

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:19744379158

VL - 52

SP - 181

EP - 208

JO - Social Problems

JF - Social Problems

SN - 0037-7791

IS - 2

ER -