The case study as research heuristic: Lessons from the R&D value mapping project

Barry Bozeman, Hans K. Klein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How can case studies be used as a research heuristic? If prototype case studies are performed, what can researchers expect to learn from them and how can they be structured to enhance their learning value? This paper considers that question and the learning from two case studies intended to inform multiple case studies undertaken later in the project. Two prototype cases are presented, one Brookhaven National Laboratory, the other from Los Alamos National Laboratory, each having as its objective providing information about how to design and execute the subsequent 30 case studies to be undertaken. This paper summarizes the cases, presents some of the lessons learned for the subsequent larger project and then considers more generally the use of prototype case studies and the preconditions for their successful deployment. Prototype case studies are particularly useful for helping set boundaries for later studies, identifying the ways in which the research setting affects research findings, making judgments about the accessibility and availability of data, and determining respondents' reactions to the research and the researchers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-103
Number of pages13
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Volume22
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

heuristics
Research
Values
learning
Research Personnel
Learning
accessibility
project
Heuristics
Prototype
laboratory

Keywords

  • Case study
  • Methodology
  • National laboratories
  • R&D value mapping
  • Research evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The case study as research heuristic : Lessons from the R&D value mapping project. / Bozeman, Barry; Klein, Hans K.

In: Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 22, No. 1, 03.1999, p. 91-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{37007ec4fdb6454eb709ffba3da97a70,
title = "The case study as research heuristic: Lessons from the R&D value mapping project",
abstract = "How can case studies be used as a research heuristic? If prototype case studies are performed, what can researchers expect to learn from them and how can they be structured to enhance their learning value? This paper considers that question and the learning from two case studies intended to inform multiple case studies undertaken later in the project. Two prototype cases are presented, one Brookhaven National Laboratory, the other from Los Alamos National Laboratory, each having as its objective providing information about how to design and execute the subsequent 30 case studies to be undertaken. This paper summarizes the cases, presents some of the lessons learned for the subsequent larger project and then considers more generally the use of prototype case studies and the preconditions for their successful deployment. Prototype case studies are particularly useful for helping set boundaries for later studies, identifying the ways in which the research setting affects research findings, making judgments about the accessibility and availability of data, and determining respondents' reactions to the research and the researchers.",
keywords = "Case study, Methodology, National laboratories, R&D value mapping, Research evaluation",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Klein, {Hans K.}",
year = "1999",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "91--103",
journal = "Evaluation and Program Planning",
issn = "0149-7189",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The case study as research heuristic

T2 - Lessons from the R&D value mapping project

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Klein, Hans K.

PY - 1999/3

Y1 - 1999/3

N2 - How can case studies be used as a research heuristic? If prototype case studies are performed, what can researchers expect to learn from them and how can they be structured to enhance their learning value? This paper considers that question and the learning from two case studies intended to inform multiple case studies undertaken later in the project. Two prototype cases are presented, one Brookhaven National Laboratory, the other from Los Alamos National Laboratory, each having as its objective providing information about how to design and execute the subsequent 30 case studies to be undertaken. This paper summarizes the cases, presents some of the lessons learned for the subsequent larger project and then considers more generally the use of prototype case studies and the preconditions for their successful deployment. Prototype case studies are particularly useful for helping set boundaries for later studies, identifying the ways in which the research setting affects research findings, making judgments about the accessibility and availability of data, and determining respondents' reactions to the research and the researchers.

AB - How can case studies be used as a research heuristic? If prototype case studies are performed, what can researchers expect to learn from them and how can they be structured to enhance their learning value? This paper considers that question and the learning from two case studies intended to inform multiple case studies undertaken later in the project. Two prototype cases are presented, one Brookhaven National Laboratory, the other from Los Alamos National Laboratory, each having as its objective providing information about how to design and execute the subsequent 30 case studies to be undertaken. This paper summarizes the cases, presents some of the lessons learned for the subsequent larger project and then considers more generally the use of prototype case studies and the preconditions for their successful deployment. Prototype case studies are particularly useful for helping set boundaries for later studies, identifying the ways in which the research setting affects research findings, making judgments about the accessibility and availability of data, and determining respondents' reactions to the research and the researchers.

KW - Case study

KW - Methodology

KW - National laboratories

KW - R&D value mapping

KW - Research evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0004903919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0004903919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0004903919

VL - 22

SP - 91

EP - 103

JO - Evaluation and Program Planning

JF - Evaluation and Program Planning

SN - 0149-7189

IS - 1

ER -