The bright and dark side of writing motivation

Effects of explicit instruction and peer assistance

Fien de Smedt, Stephen Graham, Hilde Van Keer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors investigated the impact of explicit instruction and peer-assisted writing on students' writing motivation and self-efficacy for writing. Eleven teachers and their 206 fifth- and sixth-grade students participated in a 2 (explicit instruction vs. writing opportunities without explicit instruction) × 2 (peer-assisted writing vs. writing individually) experimental intervention study with a pretest-posttest design. The four experimental conditions were compared with a business-as-usual (BAU) condition. The five-week interventions were implemented in authentic classes by regular class teachers, who received a prior professional development training. Multilevel analyses showed that students who wrote with a peer were more autonomously motivated at posttest than BAU students. Additionally, BAU students and students receiving explicit instruction were more controlled motivated than students who were offered ample writing opportunities while practicing individually. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed in view of realizing a bright pathway towards autonomous writing motivation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Educational Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 15 2018

Fingerprint

assistance
instruction
student
teacher
self-efficacy

Keywords

  • Elementary education
  • intervention study
  • self-efficacy for writing
  • writing motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

The bright and dark side of writing motivation : Effects of explicit instruction and peer assistance. / de Smedt, Fien; Graham, Stephen; Van Keer, Hilde.

In: Journal of Educational Research, 15.05.2018, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0ce26ee4ae0e4ddbbdf8b346bf9f7894,
title = "The bright and dark side of writing motivation: Effects of explicit instruction and peer assistance",
abstract = "The authors investigated the impact of explicit instruction and peer-assisted writing on students' writing motivation and self-efficacy for writing. Eleven teachers and their 206 fifth- and sixth-grade students participated in a 2 (explicit instruction vs. writing opportunities without explicit instruction) × 2 (peer-assisted writing vs. writing individually) experimental intervention study with a pretest-posttest design. The four experimental conditions were compared with a business-as-usual (BAU) condition. The five-week interventions were implemented in authentic classes by regular class teachers, who received a prior professional development training. Multilevel analyses showed that students who wrote with a peer were more autonomously motivated at posttest than BAU students. Additionally, BAU students and students receiving explicit instruction were more controlled motivated than students who were offered ample writing opportunities while practicing individually. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed in view of realizing a bright pathway towards autonomous writing motivation.",
keywords = "Elementary education, intervention study, self-efficacy for writing, writing motivation",
author = "{de Smedt}, Fien and Stephen Graham and {Van Keer}, Hilde",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/00220671.2018.1461598",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Journal of Educational Research",
issn = "0022-0671",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The bright and dark side of writing motivation

T2 - Effects of explicit instruction and peer assistance

AU - de Smedt, Fien

AU - Graham, Stephen

AU - Van Keer, Hilde

PY - 2018/5/15

Y1 - 2018/5/15

N2 - The authors investigated the impact of explicit instruction and peer-assisted writing on students' writing motivation and self-efficacy for writing. Eleven teachers and their 206 fifth- and sixth-grade students participated in a 2 (explicit instruction vs. writing opportunities without explicit instruction) × 2 (peer-assisted writing vs. writing individually) experimental intervention study with a pretest-posttest design. The four experimental conditions were compared with a business-as-usual (BAU) condition. The five-week interventions were implemented in authentic classes by regular class teachers, who received a prior professional development training. Multilevel analyses showed that students who wrote with a peer were more autonomously motivated at posttest than BAU students. Additionally, BAU students and students receiving explicit instruction were more controlled motivated than students who were offered ample writing opportunities while practicing individually. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed in view of realizing a bright pathway towards autonomous writing motivation.

AB - The authors investigated the impact of explicit instruction and peer-assisted writing on students' writing motivation and self-efficacy for writing. Eleven teachers and their 206 fifth- and sixth-grade students participated in a 2 (explicit instruction vs. writing opportunities without explicit instruction) × 2 (peer-assisted writing vs. writing individually) experimental intervention study with a pretest-posttest design. The four experimental conditions were compared with a business-as-usual (BAU) condition. The five-week interventions were implemented in authentic classes by regular class teachers, who received a prior professional development training. Multilevel analyses showed that students who wrote with a peer were more autonomously motivated at posttest than BAU students. Additionally, BAU students and students receiving explicit instruction were more controlled motivated than students who were offered ample writing opportunities while practicing individually. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed in view of realizing a bright pathway towards autonomous writing motivation.

KW - Elementary education

KW - intervention study

KW - self-efficacy for writing

KW - writing motivation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047166020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047166020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00220671.2018.1461598

DO - 10.1080/00220671.2018.1461598

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Journal of Educational Research

JF - Journal of Educational Research

SN - 0022-0671

ER -