The Bouchard-120 and chalk point spill responses

Objectives and performance metrics

S. P. Tuler, Thomas Seager, R. Kay, I. Linkov

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Oil spills present a chronic threat to the environmental security of most major ports. While mitigation of the risk of oil spills should include prevention, major oil spills remain periodic occurrences. Consequently, spill preparedness and response are critical aspects of minimizing the damage caused by spills. Nonetheless, any major spill response engages multiple stakeholder and public groups that may have different objectives. Currently, spill managers must balance conflicts in the midst of a crisis using ad hoc or heuristic approaches that may be difficult to justify or communicate. Public expectations are particularly challenging to manage. In some cases, the spill response may be perceived as a failure despite the response agency's best efforts. A systematic approach to stating varied spill objectives and tracking progress may result in better management and communication and improve the credibility of spill managers. This research studies two separate spill incidents to reveal the different types of objectives held by engaged personnel and the ways that they assess the progress of the response. A total of 30 interviews are conducted and interpreted using a grounded theory approach to reveal salient objectives. Where possible, metrics relating to these objectives are elicited and the results for each spill compared. Although the quality of the study metrics is not examined in detail, we find that some spill objectives are more readily stated in terms of performance metrics than others, suggesting that spill managers may benefit from greater guidance on how to gauge progress or set goals in areas such as protection of public health and safety or mitigation of sociopolitical or economic impacts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security
Pages175-191
Number of pages17
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameNATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security
ISSN (Print)18714668

Fingerprint

chalk
oil spill
mitigation
health and safety
heuristics
economic impact
public health
gauge
stakeholder
communication
damage
public

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Tuler, S. P., Seager, T., Kay, R., & Linkov, I. (2007). The Bouchard-120 and chalk point spill responses: Objectives and performance metrics. In NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security (pp. 175-191). (NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security).

The Bouchard-120 and chalk point spill responses : Objectives and performance metrics. / Tuler, S. P.; Seager, Thomas; Kay, R.; Linkov, I.

NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security. 2007. p. 175-191 (NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Tuler, SP, Seager, T, Kay, R & Linkov, I 2007, The Bouchard-120 and chalk point spill responses: Objectives and performance metrics. in NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security. NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security, pp. 175-191.
Tuler SP, Seager T, Kay R, Linkov I. The Bouchard-120 and chalk point spill responses: Objectives and performance metrics. In NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security. 2007. p. 175-191. (NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security).
Tuler, S. P. ; Seager, Thomas ; Kay, R. ; Linkov, I. / The Bouchard-120 and chalk point spill responses : Objectives and performance metrics. NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security. 2007. pp. 175-191 (NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security).
@inproceedings{e238dff9b7cb4ce591e444c56abe9ea6,
title = "The Bouchard-120 and chalk point spill responses: Objectives and performance metrics",
abstract = "Oil spills present a chronic threat to the environmental security of most major ports. While mitigation of the risk of oil spills should include prevention, major oil spills remain periodic occurrences. Consequently, spill preparedness and response are critical aspects of minimizing the damage caused by spills. Nonetheless, any major spill response engages multiple stakeholder and public groups that may have different objectives. Currently, spill managers must balance conflicts in the midst of a crisis using ad hoc or heuristic approaches that may be difficult to justify or communicate. Public expectations are particularly challenging to manage. In some cases, the spill response may be perceived as a failure despite the response agency's best efforts. A systematic approach to stating varied spill objectives and tracking progress may result in better management and communication and improve the credibility of spill managers. This research studies two separate spill incidents to reveal the different types of objectives held by engaged personnel and the ways that they assess the progress of the response. A total of 30 interviews are conducted and interpreted using a grounded theory approach to reveal salient objectives. Where possible, metrics relating to these objectives are elicited and the results for each spill compared. Although the quality of the study metrics is not examined in detail, we find that some spill objectives are more readily stated in terms of performance metrics than others, suggesting that spill managers may benefit from greater guidance on how to gauge progress or set goals in areas such as protection of public health and safety or mitigation of sociopolitical or economic impacts.",
author = "Tuler, {S. P.} and Thomas Seager and R. Kay and I. Linkov",
year = "2007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "1402058004",
series = "NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security",
pages = "175--191",
booktitle = "NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The Bouchard-120 and chalk point spill responses

T2 - Objectives and performance metrics

AU - Tuler, S. P.

AU - Seager, Thomas

AU - Kay, R.

AU - Linkov, I.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Oil spills present a chronic threat to the environmental security of most major ports. While mitigation of the risk of oil spills should include prevention, major oil spills remain periodic occurrences. Consequently, spill preparedness and response are critical aspects of minimizing the damage caused by spills. Nonetheless, any major spill response engages multiple stakeholder and public groups that may have different objectives. Currently, spill managers must balance conflicts in the midst of a crisis using ad hoc or heuristic approaches that may be difficult to justify or communicate. Public expectations are particularly challenging to manage. In some cases, the spill response may be perceived as a failure despite the response agency's best efforts. A systematic approach to stating varied spill objectives and tracking progress may result in better management and communication and improve the credibility of spill managers. This research studies two separate spill incidents to reveal the different types of objectives held by engaged personnel and the ways that they assess the progress of the response. A total of 30 interviews are conducted and interpreted using a grounded theory approach to reveal salient objectives. Where possible, metrics relating to these objectives are elicited and the results for each spill compared. Although the quality of the study metrics is not examined in detail, we find that some spill objectives are more readily stated in terms of performance metrics than others, suggesting that spill managers may benefit from greater guidance on how to gauge progress or set goals in areas such as protection of public health and safety or mitigation of sociopolitical or economic impacts.

AB - Oil spills present a chronic threat to the environmental security of most major ports. While mitigation of the risk of oil spills should include prevention, major oil spills remain periodic occurrences. Consequently, spill preparedness and response are critical aspects of minimizing the damage caused by spills. Nonetheless, any major spill response engages multiple stakeholder and public groups that may have different objectives. Currently, spill managers must balance conflicts in the midst of a crisis using ad hoc or heuristic approaches that may be difficult to justify or communicate. Public expectations are particularly challenging to manage. In some cases, the spill response may be perceived as a failure despite the response agency's best efforts. A systematic approach to stating varied spill objectives and tracking progress may result in better management and communication and improve the credibility of spill managers. This research studies two separate spill incidents to reveal the different types of objectives held by engaged personnel and the ways that they assess the progress of the response. A total of 30 interviews are conducted and interpreted using a grounded theory approach to reveal salient objectives. Where possible, metrics relating to these objectives are elicited and the results for each spill compared. Although the quality of the study metrics is not examined in detail, we find that some spill objectives are more readily stated in terms of performance metrics than others, suggesting that spill managers may benefit from greater guidance on how to gauge progress or set goals in areas such as protection of public health and safety or mitigation of sociopolitical or economic impacts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249745627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249745627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 1402058004

SN - 9781402058004

T3 - NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security

SP - 175

EP - 191

BT - NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security

ER -