The bin Laden exception

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Osama bin Laden's demise provides an opportune moment to reevaluate the extraordinary measures taken by the U.S. government in the "war on terror," with any reassessment incorporating the threat posed by al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations. Some modest analysis suggests that terrorism remains a miniscule risk for the average American, and it hardly poses an existential threat to the United States. Nonetheless, terrorism-related fears have distorted the people's risk perception and facilitated dubious public policies, exemplified here by a series of programs implemented by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Among other things, this agency has adopted costly technology and intrusive pat downs to screen airline passengers with little evidence that the terrorist risk has been meaningfully and efficiently reduced as a result. The TSA regime also clashes with core constitutional values and decent understandings of the Fourth Amendment. To date, however, the courts have been deferential to the government. Although the decisions rehearse established exceptions, they are indicative of an entirely new constitutional exception grounded in irrational fears of terrorism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1489-1512
Number of pages24
JournalNorthwestern University Law Review
Volume106
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

terrorism
threat
anxiety
amendment
public policy
regime
evidence
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

The bin Laden exception. / Luna, Erik.

In: Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 106, No. 3, 2012, p. 1489-1512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Luna, E 2012, 'The bin Laden exception', Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 1489-1512.
Luna, Erik. / The bin Laden exception. In: Northwestern University Law Review. 2012 ; Vol. 106, No. 3. pp. 1489-1512.
@article{0988cdf3d2cc4a7fb9c5a25342861b0f,
title = "The bin Laden exception",
abstract = "Osama bin Laden's demise provides an opportune moment to reevaluate the extraordinary measures taken by the U.S. government in the {"}war on terror,{"} with any reassessment incorporating the threat posed by al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations. Some modest analysis suggests that terrorism remains a miniscule risk for the average American, and it hardly poses an existential threat to the United States. Nonetheless, terrorism-related fears have distorted the people's risk perception and facilitated dubious public policies, exemplified here by a series of programs implemented by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Among other things, this agency has adopted costly technology and intrusive pat downs to screen airline passengers with little evidence that the terrorist risk has been meaningfully and efficiently reduced as a result. The TSA regime also clashes with core constitutional values and decent understandings of the Fourth Amendment. To date, however, the courts have been deferential to the government. Although the decisions rehearse established exceptions, they are indicative of an entirely new constitutional exception grounded in irrational fears of terrorism.",
author = "Erik Luna",
year = "2012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "1489--1512",
journal = "Northwestern University Law Review",
issn = "0029-3571",
publisher = "University of Illinois Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The bin Laden exception

AU - Luna, Erik

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Osama bin Laden's demise provides an opportune moment to reevaluate the extraordinary measures taken by the U.S. government in the "war on terror," with any reassessment incorporating the threat posed by al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations. Some modest analysis suggests that terrorism remains a miniscule risk for the average American, and it hardly poses an existential threat to the United States. Nonetheless, terrorism-related fears have distorted the people's risk perception and facilitated dubious public policies, exemplified here by a series of programs implemented by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Among other things, this agency has adopted costly technology and intrusive pat downs to screen airline passengers with little evidence that the terrorist risk has been meaningfully and efficiently reduced as a result. The TSA regime also clashes with core constitutional values and decent understandings of the Fourth Amendment. To date, however, the courts have been deferential to the government. Although the decisions rehearse established exceptions, they are indicative of an entirely new constitutional exception grounded in irrational fears of terrorism.

AB - Osama bin Laden's demise provides an opportune moment to reevaluate the extraordinary measures taken by the U.S. government in the "war on terror," with any reassessment incorporating the threat posed by al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations. Some modest analysis suggests that terrorism remains a miniscule risk for the average American, and it hardly poses an existential threat to the United States. Nonetheless, terrorism-related fears have distorted the people's risk perception and facilitated dubious public policies, exemplified here by a series of programs implemented by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Among other things, this agency has adopted costly technology and intrusive pat downs to screen airline passengers with little evidence that the terrorist risk has been meaningfully and efficiently reduced as a result. The TSA regime also clashes with core constitutional values and decent understandings of the Fourth Amendment. To date, however, the courts have been deferential to the government. Although the decisions rehearse established exceptions, they are indicative of an entirely new constitutional exception grounded in irrational fears of terrorism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866904449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866904449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 1489

EP - 1512

JO - Northwestern University Law Review

JF - Northwestern University Law Review

SN - 0029-3571

IS - 3

ER -