The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies

Michael Dorman, Rene H. Gifford, Anthony J. Spahr, Sharon A. McKarns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

158 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fifteen patients fit with a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the other ear were presented with tests of speech and melody recognition and voice discrimination under conditions of electric (E) stimulation, acoustic (A) stimulation and combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). When acoustic information was added to electrically stimulated information performance increased by 17-23 percentage points on tests of word and sentence recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise. On average, the EAS patients achieved higher scores on CNC words than patients fit with a unilateral cochlear implant. While the best EAS patients did not outperform the best patients fit with a unilateral cochlear implant, proportionally more EAS patients achieved very high scores on tests of speech recognition than unilateral cochlear implant patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-112
Number of pages8
JournalAudiology and Neurotology
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2008

Fingerprint

Acoustic Stimulation
Electric Stimulation
Cochlear Implants
Ear
Hearing Aids
Acoustics
Noise

Keywords

  • Cochlear implant
  • Electric and acoustic stimulation
  • Low-frequency hearing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. / Dorman, Michael; Gifford, Rene H.; Spahr, Anthony J.; McKarns, Sharon A.

In: Audiology and Neurotology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 02.2008, p. 105-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dorman, Michael ; Gifford, Rene H. ; Spahr, Anthony J. ; McKarns, Sharon A. / The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. In: Audiology and Neurotology. 2008 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 105-112.
@article{d57c2cd641b74b15ba12680d4a853ca7,
title = "The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies",
abstract = "Fifteen patients fit with a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the other ear were presented with tests of speech and melody recognition and voice discrimination under conditions of electric (E) stimulation, acoustic (A) stimulation and combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). When acoustic information was added to electrically stimulated information performance increased by 17-23 percentage points on tests of word and sentence recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise. On average, the EAS patients achieved higher scores on CNC words than patients fit with a unilateral cochlear implant. While the best EAS patients did not outperform the best patients fit with a unilateral cochlear implant, proportionally more EAS patients achieved very high scores on tests of speech recognition than unilateral cochlear implant patients.",
keywords = "Cochlear implant, Electric and acoustic stimulation, Low-frequency hearing",
author = "Michael Dorman and Gifford, {Rene H.} and Spahr, {Anthony J.} and McKarns, {Sharon A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1159/000111782",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "105--112",
journal = "Audiology and Neuro-Otology",
issn = "1420-3030",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies

AU - Dorman, Michael

AU - Gifford, Rene H.

AU - Spahr, Anthony J.

AU - McKarns, Sharon A.

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - Fifteen patients fit with a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the other ear were presented with tests of speech and melody recognition and voice discrimination under conditions of electric (E) stimulation, acoustic (A) stimulation and combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). When acoustic information was added to electrically stimulated information performance increased by 17-23 percentage points on tests of word and sentence recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise. On average, the EAS patients achieved higher scores on CNC words than patients fit with a unilateral cochlear implant. While the best EAS patients did not outperform the best patients fit with a unilateral cochlear implant, proportionally more EAS patients achieved very high scores on tests of speech recognition than unilateral cochlear implant patients.

AB - Fifteen patients fit with a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the other ear were presented with tests of speech and melody recognition and voice discrimination under conditions of electric (E) stimulation, acoustic (A) stimulation and combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). When acoustic information was added to electrically stimulated information performance increased by 17-23 percentage points on tests of word and sentence recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise. On average, the EAS patients achieved higher scores on CNC words than patients fit with a unilateral cochlear implant. While the best EAS patients did not outperform the best patients fit with a unilateral cochlear implant, proportionally more EAS patients achieved very high scores on tests of speech recognition than unilateral cochlear implant patients.

KW - Cochlear implant

KW - Electric and acoustic stimulation

KW - Low-frequency hearing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38949108714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38949108714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000111782

DO - 10.1159/000111782

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 105

EP - 112

JO - Audiology and Neuro-Otology

JF - Audiology and Neuro-Otology

SN - 1420-3030

IS - 2

ER -