Abstract

Recent work has documented a wide range of important psychological differences across societies. Multiple explanations have been offered for why such differences exist, including historical philosophies, subsistence methods, social mobility, social class, climactic stresses, and religion. With the growing body of theory and data, there is an emerging need for an organizing framework. We propose here that a behavioral ecological perspective, particularly the idea of adaptive phenotypic plasticity, can provide an overarching framework for thinking about psychological variation across cultures and societies. We focus on how societies vary as a function of six important ecological dimensions: density, relatedness, sex ratio, mortality likelihood, resources, and disease. This framework can: (a) highlight new areas of research, (b) integrate and ground existing cultural psychological explanations, (c) integrate research on variation across human societies with research on parallel variations in other animal species, (d) provide a way for thinking about multiple levels of culture and cultural change, and (e) facilitate the creation of an ecological taxonomy of societies, from which one can derive specific predictions about cultural differences and similarities. Finally, we discuss the relationships between the current framework and existing perspectives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPsychological Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Apr 23 2018

Fingerprint

Ecology
Psychology
Social Mobility
Research
Sex Ratio
Religion
Social Class
Mortality

Keywords

  • Behavioral ecology
  • Cultural psychology
  • Evoked culture
  • Phenotypic plasticity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{934cf6d5340f4510a4b8da36397471d3,
title = "The Behavioral Ecology of Cultural Psychological Variation",
abstract = "Recent work has documented a wide range of important psychological differences across societies. Multiple explanations have been offered for why such differences exist, including historical philosophies, subsistence methods, social mobility, social class, climactic stresses, and religion. With the growing body of theory and data, there is an emerging need for an organizing framework. We propose here that a behavioral ecological perspective, particularly the idea of adaptive phenotypic plasticity, can provide an overarching framework for thinking about psychological variation across cultures and societies. We focus on how societies vary as a function of six important ecological dimensions: density, relatedness, sex ratio, mortality likelihood, resources, and disease. This framework can: (a) highlight new areas of research, (b) integrate and ground existing cultural psychological explanations, (c) integrate research on variation across human societies with research on parallel variations in other animal species, (d) provide a way for thinking about multiple levels of culture and cultural change, and (e) facilitate the creation of an ecological taxonomy of societies, from which one can derive specific predictions about cultural differences and similarities. Finally, we discuss the relationships between the current framework and existing perspectives.",
keywords = "Behavioral ecology, Cultural psychology, Evoked culture, Phenotypic plasticity",
author = "Oliver Sng and Steven Neuberg and Michael Varnum and Douglas Kenrick",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1037/rev0000104",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Behavioral Ecology of Cultural Psychological Variation

AU - Sng, Oliver

AU - Neuberg, Steven

AU - Varnum, Michael

AU - Kenrick, Douglas

PY - 2018/4/23

Y1 - 2018/4/23

N2 - Recent work has documented a wide range of important psychological differences across societies. Multiple explanations have been offered for why such differences exist, including historical philosophies, subsistence methods, social mobility, social class, climactic stresses, and religion. With the growing body of theory and data, there is an emerging need for an organizing framework. We propose here that a behavioral ecological perspective, particularly the idea of adaptive phenotypic plasticity, can provide an overarching framework for thinking about psychological variation across cultures and societies. We focus on how societies vary as a function of six important ecological dimensions: density, relatedness, sex ratio, mortality likelihood, resources, and disease. This framework can: (a) highlight new areas of research, (b) integrate and ground existing cultural psychological explanations, (c) integrate research on variation across human societies with research on parallel variations in other animal species, (d) provide a way for thinking about multiple levels of culture and cultural change, and (e) facilitate the creation of an ecological taxonomy of societies, from which one can derive specific predictions about cultural differences and similarities. Finally, we discuss the relationships between the current framework and existing perspectives.

AB - Recent work has documented a wide range of important psychological differences across societies. Multiple explanations have been offered for why such differences exist, including historical philosophies, subsistence methods, social mobility, social class, climactic stresses, and religion. With the growing body of theory and data, there is an emerging need for an organizing framework. We propose here that a behavioral ecological perspective, particularly the idea of adaptive phenotypic plasticity, can provide an overarching framework for thinking about psychological variation across cultures and societies. We focus on how societies vary as a function of six important ecological dimensions: density, relatedness, sex ratio, mortality likelihood, resources, and disease. This framework can: (a) highlight new areas of research, (b) integrate and ground existing cultural psychological explanations, (c) integrate research on variation across human societies with research on parallel variations in other animal species, (d) provide a way for thinking about multiple levels of culture and cultural change, and (e) facilitate the creation of an ecological taxonomy of societies, from which one can derive specific predictions about cultural differences and similarities. Finally, we discuss the relationships between the current framework and existing perspectives.

KW - Behavioral ecology

KW - Cultural psychology

KW - Evoked culture

KW - Phenotypic plasticity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045712339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045712339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/rev0000104

DO - 10.1037/rev0000104

M3 - Article

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

ER -