TY - JOUR
T1 - The behavioral ecology of cultural psychological variation
AU - Sng, Oliver
AU - Neuberg, Steven
AU - Varnum, Michael
AU - Kenrick, Douglas
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Josh Ackerman, Kim Hill, Cristina Salvador, Jacinth Tan, members of the ASU ESC lab and UM ESP lab, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions on various versions of the manuscript. The paper is itself a (hopefully successful) product of cultural evolution.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Recent work has documented a wide range of important psychological differences across societies. Multiple explanations have been offered for why such differences exist, including historical philosophies, subsistence methods, social mobility, social class, climactic stresses, and religion. With the growing body of theory and data, there is an emerging need for an organizing framework. We propose here that a behavioral ecological perspective, particularly the idea of adaptive phenotypic plasticity, can provide an overarching framework for thinking about psychological variation across cultures and societies. We focus on how societies vary as a function of six important ecological dimensions: density, relatedness, sex ratio, mortality likelihood, resources, and disease. This framework can: (a) highlight new areas of research, (b) integrate and ground existing cultural psychological explanations, (c) integrate research on variation across human societies with research on parallel variations in other animal species, (d) provide a way for thinking about multiple levels of culture and cultural change, and (e) facilitate the creation of an ecological taxonomy of societies, from which one can derive specific predictions about cultural differences and similarities. Finally, we discuss the relationships between the current framework and existing perspectives.
AB - Recent work has documented a wide range of important psychological differences across societies. Multiple explanations have been offered for why such differences exist, including historical philosophies, subsistence methods, social mobility, social class, climactic stresses, and religion. With the growing body of theory and data, there is an emerging need for an organizing framework. We propose here that a behavioral ecological perspective, particularly the idea of adaptive phenotypic plasticity, can provide an overarching framework for thinking about psychological variation across cultures and societies. We focus on how societies vary as a function of six important ecological dimensions: density, relatedness, sex ratio, mortality likelihood, resources, and disease. This framework can: (a) highlight new areas of research, (b) integrate and ground existing cultural psychological explanations, (c) integrate research on variation across human societies with research on parallel variations in other animal species, (d) provide a way for thinking about multiple levels of culture and cultural change, and (e) facilitate the creation of an ecological taxonomy of societies, from which one can derive specific predictions about cultural differences and similarities. Finally, we discuss the relationships between the current framework and existing perspectives.
KW - Behavioral ecology
KW - Cultural psychology
KW - Evoked culture
KW - Phenotypic plasticity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045712339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045712339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/rev0000104
DO - 10.1037/rev0000104
M3 - Article
C2 - 29683692
AN - SCOPUS:85045712339
SN - 0033-295X
VL - 125
SP - 714
EP - 743
JO - Psychological Review
JF - Psychological Review
IS - 5
ER -