The bargaining view of government–business relations

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The idea that relations between international companies and national governments can usefully be viewed as a bargaining situation is not new in the international business literature. If we limit the history of business analysis to just post-Second World War writings, then the focus on these relations probably began with someone such as Stephen Hymer (1960), who looked at multinational firms as institutions that internalize transactions costs (efficiency) and at the same time seek to dominate markets through monopoly power (equity). He did not relate the former issue to dealings with governments, but he certainly did consider the second issue, arguing that powerful international firms can pursue monopolistic goals, unless they are constrained by governments. While his perspective was ultimately critical of multinational firms, his focus included the key relationship of concern here, between national governments and international firms. Another author writing at the same time was Jack Behrman (1960, 1962), who explored the use of foreign direct investment as a tool for economic development, and who recommended government policies to stimulate this activity. Behrman's work was far more policy oriented, with emphasis on explaining the phenomenon of foreign direct investment, and on how governments could channel (encourage) that activity to pursue development goals. Behrman clearly focused on the interests of firms and the interests of governments, and on the ways in which they could pursue mutually acceptable goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInternational Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages273-290
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9780511488597
ISBN (Print)0521850029, 9780521850025
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Government
Foreign direct investment
Multinational firms
International business
Economic development
International relations
Transaction costs
Government policy
Monopoly power
Equity
Business analysis
Second World War

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Grosse, R. (2005). The bargaining view of government–business relations. In International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century (pp. 273-290). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488597.012

The bargaining view of government–business relations. / Grosse, Robert.

International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, 2005. p. 273-290.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Grosse, R 2005, The bargaining view of government–business relations. in International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, pp. 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488597.012
Grosse R. The bargaining view of government–business relations. In International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press. 2005. p. 273-290 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488597.012
Grosse, Robert. / The bargaining view of government–business relations. International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, 2005. pp. 273-290
@inbook{d6701bdf3e6c46ad91994037545280ae,
title = "The bargaining view of government–business relations",
abstract = "The idea that relations between international companies and national governments can usefully be viewed as a bargaining situation is not new in the international business literature. If we limit the history of business analysis to just post-Second World War writings, then the focus on these relations probably began with someone such as Stephen Hymer (1960), who looked at multinational firms as institutions that internalize transactions costs (efficiency) and at the same time seek to dominate markets through monopoly power (equity). He did not relate the former issue to dealings with governments, but he certainly did consider the second issue, arguing that powerful international firms can pursue monopolistic goals, unless they are constrained by governments. While his perspective was ultimately critical of multinational firms, his focus included the key relationship of concern here, between national governments and international firms. Another author writing at the same time was Jack Behrman (1960, 1962), who explored the use of foreign direct investment as a tool for economic development, and who recommended government policies to stimulate this activity. Behrman's work was far more policy oriented, with emphasis on explaining the phenomenon of foreign direct investment, and on how governments could channel (encourage) that activity to pursue development goals. Behrman clearly focused on the interests of firms and the interests of governments, and on the ways in which they could pursue mutually acceptable goals.",
author = "Robert Grosse",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511488597.012",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0521850029",
pages = "273--290",
booktitle = "International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The bargaining view of government–business relations

AU - Grosse, Robert

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - The idea that relations between international companies and national governments can usefully be viewed as a bargaining situation is not new in the international business literature. If we limit the history of business analysis to just post-Second World War writings, then the focus on these relations probably began with someone such as Stephen Hymer (1960), who looked at multinational firms as institutions that internalize transactions costs (efficiency) and at the same time seek to dominate markets through monopoly power (equity). He did not relate the former issue to dealings with governments, but he certainly did consider the second issue, arguing that powerful international firms can pursue monopolistic goals, unless they are constrained by governments. While his perspective was ultimately critical of multinational firms, his focus included the key relationship of concern here, between national governments and international firms. Another author writing at the same time was Jack Behrman (1960, 1962), who explored the use of foreign direct investment as a tool for economic development, and who recommended government policies to stimulate this activity. Behrman's work was far more policy oriented, with emphasis on explaining the phenomenon of foreign direct investment, and on how governments could channel (encourage) that activity to pursue development goals. Behrman clearly focused on the interests of firms and the interests of governments, and on the ways in which they could pursue mutually acceptable goals.

AB - The idea that relations between international companies and national governments can usefully be viewed as a bargaining situation is not new in the international business literature. If we limit the history of business analysis to just post-Second World War writings, then the focus on these relations probably began with someone such as Stephen Hymer (1960), who looked at multinational firms as institutions that internalize transactions costs (efficiency) and at the same time seek to dominate markets through monopoly power (equity). He did not relate the former issue to dealings with governments, but he certainly did consider the second issue, arguing that powerful international firms can pursue monopolistic goals, unless they are constrained by governments. While his perspective was ultimately critical of multinational firms, his focus included the key relationship of concern here, between national governments and international firms. Another author writing at the same time was Jack Behrman (1960, 1962), who explored the use of foreign direct investment as a tool for economic development, and who recommended government policies to stimulate this activity. Behrman's work was far more policy oriented, with emphasis on explaining the phenomenon of foreign direct investment, and on how governments could channel (encourage) that activity to pursue development goals. Behrman clearly focused on the interests of firms and the interests of governments, and on the ways in which they could pursue mutually acceptable goals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926975011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926975011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511488597.012

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511488597.012

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0521850029

SN - 9780521850025

SP - 273

EP - 290

BT - International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -