The attributional theory of achievement motivation: Cross-cultural considerations

Joan L. Duda, Maria T. Allison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on data collected from the Navajo Indian and other comparative investigations, limitations in previous cross-cultural attributional analyses of achievement motivation are proposed. First, it is suggested that the present comparative attribution literature is characterized by several conceptual perspectives which may be ethnocentric in nature, namely (a) the definitions of success and failure assumed, (b) the causal elements which are imposed, and (c) the tendency to classify causal attributions within bi-polar taxonomic dimensions which may not be meaningful to the culture of interest. Research directions for future cross-cultural attribution work which should assist the comparative investigator in overcoming these conceptual limitations are provided. Second, it is argued that the attributional theory of achievement motivation has several epistemological assumptions inherent within it concerning perspectives of time, individualism, and the nature of causation. These assumptions might lay the basis for a theory which reflects a culturally-specific cognitive process. Further research on the nature and frequency of the attributional process among diverse cultures is advocated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-55
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

achievement motivation
attribution
Motivation
Research
Causality
Research Personnel
individualism
present
Achievement motivation
Attribution
Direction compound
Cognitive processes
Causation
Research directions
Causal attributions
Individualism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The attributional theory of achievement motivation : Cross-cultural considerations. / Duda, Joan L.; Allison, Maria T.

In: International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1989, p. 37-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{df2d9d86b5ed4d7abaa2724b3c45250b,
title = "The attributional theory of achievement motivation: Cross-cultural considerations",
abstract = "Based on data collected from the Navajo Indian and other comparative investigations, limitations in previous cross-cultural attributional analyses of achievement motivation are proposed. First, it is suggested that the present comparative attribution literature is characterized by several conceptual perspectives which may be ethnocentric in nature, namely (a) the definitions of success and failure assumed, (b) the causal elements which are imposed, and (c) the tendency to classify causal attributions within bi-polar taxonomic dimensions which may not be meaningful to the culture of interest. Research directions for future cross-cultural attribution work which should assist the comparative investigator in overcoming these conceptual limitations are provided. Second, it is argued that the attributional theory of achievement motivation has several epistemological assumptions inherent within it concerning perspectives of time, individualism, and the nature of causation. These assumptions might lay the basis for a theory which reflects a culturally-specific cognitive process. Further research on the nature and frequency of the attributional process among diverse cultures is advocated.",
author = "Duda, {Joan L.} and Allison, {Maria T.}",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1016/0147-1767(89)90034-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "37--55",
journal = "International Journal of Intercultural Relations",
issn = "0147-1767",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The attributional theory of achievement motivation

T2 - Cross-cultural considerations

AU - Duda, Joan L.

AU - Allison, Maria T.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Based on data collected from the Navajo Indian and other comparative investigations, limitations in previous cross-cultural attributional analyses of achievement motivation are proposed. First, it is suggested that the present comparative attribution literature is characterized by several conceptual perspectives which may be ethnocentric in nature, namely (a) the definitions of success and failure assumed, (b) the causal elements which are imposed, and (c) the tendency to classify causal attributions within bi-polar taxonomic dimensions which may not be meaningful to the culture of interest. Research directions for future cross-cultural attribution work which should assist the comparative investigator in overcoming these conceptual limitations are provided. Second, it is argued that the attributional theory of achievement motivation has several epistemological assumptions inherent within it concerning perspectives of time, individualism, and the nature of causation. These assumptions might lay the basis for a theory which reflects a culturally-specific cognitive process. Further research on the nature and frequency of the attributional process among diverse cultures is advocated.

AB - Based on data collected from the Navajo Indian and other comparative investigations, limitations in previous cross-cultural attributional analyses of achievement motivation are proposed. First, it is suggested that the present comparative attribution literature is characterized by several conceptual perspectives which may be ethnocentric in nature, namely (a) the definitions of success and failure assumed, (b) the causal elements which are imposed, and (c) the tendency to classify causal attributions within bi-polar taxonomic dimensions which may not be meaningful to the culture of interest. Research directions for future cross-cultural attribution work which should assist the comparative investigator in overcoming these conceptual limitations are provided. Second, it is argued that the attributional theory of achievement motivation has several epistemological assumptions inherent within it concerning perspectives of time, individualism, and the nature of causation. These assumptions might lay the basis for a theory which reflects a culturally-specific cognitive process. Further research on the nature and frequency of the attributional process among diverse cultures is advocated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38249026577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38249026577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0147-1767(89)90034-5

DO - 10.1016/0147-1767(89)90034-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38249026577

VL - 13

SP - 37

EP - 55

JO - International Journal of Intercultural Relations

JF - International Journal of Intercultural Relations

SN - 0147-1767

IS - 1

ER -