The association between program credibility, expectancy, and acceptability with baseline pathology and outcome for a body acceptance prevention program

Emma J. Stinson, Marisol Perez La Mar, Tara K. Ohrt, Anna Von Schell, Amanda B. Bruening

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The current study sought to investigate whether credibility, expectancy, and acceptability of the Body Project is impacted by level of disordered eating pathology and whether perceived credibility, expectancy, and acceptability impacts treatment outcomes. Methods: The sample included 170 undergraduate women from a large public university. Participants completed self-report questionnaires on perceived credibility, expectancy, treatment acceptability, and disordered eating measures. A random subset of 51 participants provided 3-month follow-up measurements. Results: Analyses revealed that post-prevention credibility, expectancy, and treatment acceptability scores were negatively associated with baseline thin-ideal internalization, baseline weight, and shape concerns, and positively associated with baseline body satisfaction and the baseline restraint subscale of the EDEQ. Perceived credibility, expectancy, and treatment acceptability were not associated with session attendance or 3-month follow-up disordered eating scores. Discussion: The Body Project is effective at reducing disordered eating regardless of whether participants liked the program or not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2161-2172
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychology
Volume74
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Eating
Pathology
Self Report
Therapeutics
Weights and Measures
Credibility
Acceptability
Expectancy
Acceptance

Keywords

  • acceptability
  • Body Project
  • credibility
  • disordered eating
  • eating disorders
  • expectancy
  • prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The association between program credibility, expectancy, and acceptability with baseline pathology and outcome for a body acceptance prevention program. / Stinson, Emma J.; Perez La Mar, Marisol; Ohrt, Tara K.; Von Schell, Anna; Bruening, Amanda B.

In: Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 12, 01.12.2018, p. 2161-2172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bace0eaaa2b44612822580aaec43bdb7,
title = "The association between program credibility, expectancy, and acceptability with baseline pathology and outcome for a body acceptance prevention program",
abstract = "Objective: The current study sought to investigate whether credibility, expectancy, and acceptability of the Body Project is impacted by level of disordered eating pathology and whether perceived credibility, expectancy, and acceptability impacts treatment outcomes. Methods: The sample included 170 undergraduate women from a large public university. Participants completed self-report questionnaires on perceived credibility, expectancy, treatment acceptability, and disordered eating measures. A random subset of 51 participants provided 3-month follow-up measurements. Results: Analyses revealed that post-prevention credibility, expectancy, and treatment acceptability scores were negatively associated with baseline thin-ideal internalization, baseline weight, and shape concerns, and positively associated with baseline body satisfaction and the baseline restraint subscale of the EDEQ. Perceived credibility, expectancy, and treatment acceptability were not associated with session attendance or 3-month follow-up disordered eating scores. Discussion: The Body Project is effective at reducing disordered eating regardless of whether participants liked the program or not.",
keywords = "acceptability, Body Project, credibility, disordered eating, eating disorders, expectancy, prevention",
author = "Stinson, {Emma J.} and {Perez La Mar}, Marisol and Ohrt, {Tara K.} and {Von Schell}, Anna and Bruening, {Amanda B.}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jclp.22654",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "2161--2172",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0021-9762",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The association between program credibility, expectancy, and acceptability with baseline pathology and outcome for a body acceptance prevention program

AU - Stinson, Emma J.

AU - Perez La Mar, Marisol

AU - Ohrt, Tara K.

AU - Von Schell, Anna

AU - Bruening, Amanda B.

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Objective: The current study sought to investigate whether credibility, expectancy, and acceptability of the Body Project is impacted by level of disordered eating pathology and whether perceived credibility, expectancy, and acceptability impacts treatment outcomes. Methods: The sample included 170 undergraduate women from a large public university. Participants completed self-report questionnaires on perceived credibility, expectancy, treatment acceptability, and disordered eating measures. A random subset of 51 participants provided 3-month follow-up measurements. Results: Analyses revealed that post-prevention credibility, expectancy, and treatment acceptability scores were negatively associated with baseline thin-ideal internalization, baseline weight, and shape concerns, and positively associated with baseline body satisfaction and the baseline restraint subscale of the EDEQ. Perceived credibility, expectancy, and treatment acceptability were not associated with session attendance or 3-month follow-up disordered eating scores. Discussion: The Body Project is effective at reducing disordered eating regardless of whether participants liked the program or not.

AB - Objective: The current study sought to investigate whether credibility, expectancy, and acceptability of the Body Project is impacted by level of disordered eating pathology and whether perceived credibility, expectancy, and acceptability impacts treatment outcomes. Methods: The sample included 170 undergraduate women from a large public university. Participants completed self-report questionnaires on perceived credibility, expectancy, treatment acceptability, and disordered eating measures. A random subset of 51 participants provided 3-month follow-up measurements. Results: Analyses revealed that post-prevention credibility, expectancy, and treatment acceptability scores were negatively associated with baseline thin-ideal internalization, baseline weight, and shape concerns, and positively associated with baseline body satisfaction and the baseline restraint subscale of the EDEQ. Perceived credibility, expectancy, and treatment acceptability were not associated with session attendance or 3-month follow-up disordered eating scores. Discussion: The Body Project is effective at reducing disordered eating regardless of whether participants liked the program or not.

KW - acceptability

KW - Body Project

KW - credibility

KW - disordered eating

KW - eating disorders

KW - expectancy

KW - prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056607001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056607001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jclp.22654

DO - 10.1002/jclp.22654

M3 - Article

C2 - 29917236

AN - SCOPUS:85056607001

VL - 74

SP - 2161

EP - 2172

JO - Journal of Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Clinical Psychology

SN - 0021-9762

IS - 12

ER -