The assessment of emotion regulation in cognitive context: The emotion amplification and reduction scales

Nancy A. Hamilton, Paul Karoly, Matt Gallagher, Natalie Stevens, Cynthia Karlson, Danyale McCurdy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide initial psychometric evidence for the reliability and validity of The Emotion Amplification and Reduction Scales (TEARS), a questionnaire designed to assess perceived ability to change the trajectory of an emotional response. Items were formulated to assess perceived ability to amplify an emotionally response by either prolonging or intensifying an existing emotion. Additional items were selected to measure processes related to emotion reduction, selecting an emotional response or altering an existing emotion by softening, stopping, or shortening it. Both subscales, Emotion Amplification and Emotion Reduction, were found to have good internal consistency. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to document the two-factor structure of the measure and to assess evidence for construct validity. The latent Emotion Reduction variable was found to correlate inversely with negative affect and symptoms of depression. The latent Emotion Amplification variable was found to correlate with higher positive affect and also fatigue. As expected, TEARS is correlated with tonic measures of emotionality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-263
Number of pages9
JournalCognitive Therapy and Research
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Keywords

  • Emotion
  • Emotion regulation
  • Measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The assessment of emotion regulation in cognitive context: The emotion amplification and reduction scales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this