The assessment of emotion regulation in cognitive context: The emotion amplification and reduction scales

Nancy A. Hamilton, Paul Karoly, Matt Gallagher, Natalie Stevens, Cynthia Karlson, Danyale McCurdy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide initial psychometric evidence for the reliability and validity of The Emotion Amplification and Reduction Scales (TEARS), a questionnaire designed to assess perceived ability to change the trajectory of an emotional response. Items were formulated to assess perceived ability to amplify an emotionally response by either prolonging or intensifying an existing emotion. Additional items were selected to measure processes related to emotion reduction, selecting an emotional response or altering an existing emotion by softening, stopping, or shortening it. Both subscales, Emotion Amplification and Emotion Reduction, were found to have good internal consistency. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to document the two-factor structure of the measure and to assess evidence for construct validity. The latent Emotion Reduction variable was found to correlate inversely with negative affect and symptoms of depression. The latent Emotion Amplification variable was found to correlate with higher positive affect and also fatigue. As expected, TEARS is correlated with tonic measures of emotionality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-263
Number of pages9
JournalCognitive Therapy and Research
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Emotions
Aptitude
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical Factor Analysis
Fatigue
Depression

Keywords

  • Emotion
  • Emotion regulation
  • Measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

The assessment of emotion regulation in cognitive context : The emotion amplification and reduction scales. / Hamilton, Nancy A.; Karoly, Paul; Gallagher, Matt; Stevens, Natalie; Karlson, Cynthia; McCurdy, Danyale.

In: Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, 06.2009, p. 255-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hamilton, Nancy A. ; Karoly, Paul ; Gallagher, Matt ; Stevens, Natalie ; Karlson, Cynthia ; McCurdy, Danyale. / The assessment of emotion regulation in cognitive context : The emotion amplification and reduction scales. In: Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2009 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 255-263.
@article{29151ec7881f4b0c801546b7491bf0de,
title = "The assessment of emotion regulation in cognitive context: The emotion amplification and reduction scales",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to provide initial psychometric evidence for the reliability and validity of The Emotion Amplification and Reduction Scales (TEARS), a questionnaire designed to assess perceived ability to change the trajectory of an emotional response. Items were formulated to assess perceived ability to amplify an emotionally response by either prolonging or intensifying an existing emotion. Additional items were selected to measure processes related to emotion reduction, selecting an emotional response or altering an existing emotion by softening, stopping, or shortening it. Both subscales, Emotion Amplification and Emotion Reduction, were found to have good internal consistency. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to document the two-factor structure of the measure and to assess evidence for construct validity. The latent Emotion Reduction variable was found to correlate inversely with negative affect and symptoms of depression. The latent Emotion Amplification variable was found to correlate with higher positive affect and also fatigue. As expected, TEARS is correlated with tonic measures of emotionality.",
keywords = "Emotion, Emotion regulation, Measurement",
author = "Hamilton, {Nancy A.} and Paul Karoly and Matt Gallagher and Natalie Stevens and Cynthia Karlson and Danyale McCurdy",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10608-007-9163-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "255--263",
journal = "Cognitive Therapy and Research",
issn = "0147-5916",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The assessment of emotion regulation in cognitive context

T2 - The emotion amplification and reduction scales

AU - Hamilton, Nancy A.

AU - Karoly, Paul

AU - Gallagher, Matt

AU - Stevens, Natalie

AU - Karlson, Cynthia

AU - McCurdy, Danyale

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - The purpose of this study was to provide initial psychometric evidence for the reliability and validity of The Emotion Amplification and Reduction Scales (TEARS), a questionnaire designed to assess perceived ability to change the trajectory of an emotional response. Items were formulated to assess perceived ability to amplify an emotionally response by either prolonging or intensifying an existing emotion. Additional items were selected to measure processes related to emotion reduction, selecting an emotional response or altering an existing emotion by softening, stopping, or shortening it. Both subscales, Emotion Amplification and Emotion Reduction, were found to have good internal consistency. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to document the two-factor structure of the measure and to assess evidence for construct validity. The latent Emotion Reduction variable was found to correlate inversely with negative affect and symptoms of depression. The latent Emotion Amplification variable was found to correlate with higher positive affect and also fatigue. As expected, TEARS is correlated with tonic measures of emotionality.

AB - The purpose of this study was to provide initial psychometric evidence for the reliability and validity of The Emotion Amplification and Reduction Scales (TEARS), a questionnaire designed to assess perceived ability to change the trajectory of an emotional response. Items were formulated to assess perceived ability to amplify an emotionally response by either prolonging or intensifying an existing emotion. Additional items were selected to measure processes related to emotion reduction, selecting an emotional response or altering an existing emotion by softening, stopping, or shortening it. Both subscales, Emotion Amplification and Emotion Reduction, were found to have good internal consistency. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to document the two-factor structure of the measure and to assess evidence for construct validity. The latent Emotion Reduction variable was found to correlate inversely with negative affect and symptoms of depression. The latent Emotion Amplification variable was found to correlate with higher positive affect and also fatigue. As expected, TEARS is correlated with tonic measures of emotionality.

KW - Emotion

KW - Emotion regulation

KW - Measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651160343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651160343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10608-007-9163-9

DO - 10.1007/s10608-007-9163-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67651160343

VL - 33

SP - 255

EP - 263

JO - Cognitive Therapy and Research

JF - Cognitive Therapy and Research

SN - 0147-5916

IS - 3

ER -